Qualitative Investigation of the Meanings of Eating Fruits and Vegetables for Adult Couples

Judith Paisley , Judy Sheeshka , Kerry Daly
{"title":"Qualitative Investigation of the Meanings of Eating Fruits and Vegetables for Adult Couples","authors":"Judith Paisley ,&nbsp;Judy Sheeshka ,&nbsp;Kerry Daly","doi":"10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60032-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to develop a substantive theory expressing the meanings couples associated with eating fruits and vegetables.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This inductive qualitative study was based on a grounded theory approach and employed the constant comparison method of data analysis. Data were collected using semistructured individual interviews and a life history approach.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Ten adult couples, aged 20 to 60 years, with and without children, all of whom were born in North America, were recruited using modified snowball sampling.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two overarching themes emerged. The “should syndrome” describes a morality concerning fruit and vegetable consumption arising from a tension between the low status of these foods in participants' childhood homes and their contemporary idealized status. The creation of couple gastronomies expresses couples' efforts to construct their own food norms and practices within a context of changes in social norms and fruit and vegetable availability. The substantive theory, making choices that balance their lives, conveys the dynamic processes involved in participants' fruit and vegetable choices.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Future research will determine the transferability of the “should syndrome” and new couples' receptiveness to trying new fruits and vegetables. Understanding the changing contexts of food choice may help nutrition professionals better support healthful eating.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutrition education","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60032-8","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutrition education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404606600328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to develop a substantive theory expressing the meanings couples associated with eating fruits and vegetables.

Design

This inductive qualitative study was based on a grounded theory approach and employed the constant comparison method of data analysis. Data were collected using semistructured individual interviews and a life history approach.

Subjects

Ten adult couples, aged 20 to 60 years, with and without children, all of whom were born in North America, were recruited using modified snowball sampling.

Results

Two overarching themes emerged. The “should syndrome” describes a morality concerning fruit and vegetable consumption arising from a tension between the low status of these foods in participants' childhood homes and their contemporary idealized status. The creation of couple gastronomies expresses couples' efforts to construct their own food norms and practices within a context of changes in social norms and fruit and vegetable availability. The substantive theory, making choices that balance their lives, conveys the dynamic processes involved in participants' fruit and vegetable choices.

Implications

Future research will determine the transferability of the “should syndrome” and new couples' receptiveness to trying new fruits and vegetables. Understanding the changing contexts of food choice may help nutrition professionals better support healthful eating.

成年夫妇吃水果和蔬菜意义的定性调查
目的本研究的目的是发展一个实质性的理论来表达夫妻吃水果和蔬菜的意义。本归纳定性研究基于扎根理论的方法,采用数据分析的不断比较方法。数据收集采用半结构化的个人访谈和生活史方法。研究人员采用改良的滚雪球抽样方法,招募了10对年龄在20至60岁之间、有孩子或没有孩子的成年夫妇,他们都出生在北美。结果出现了两个主要主题。“应该综合症”描述了一种关于水果和蔬菜消费的道德观,这种道德观产生于这些食物在参与者童年家庭中的低地位和他们当代理想化的地位之间的紧张关系。夫妻烹饪的创造表达了夫妻在社会规范和水果和蔬菜供应变化的背景下构建自己的食物规范和实践的努力。实质性理论,做出平衡他们生活的选择,传达了参与者选择水果和蔬菜的动态过程。未来的研究将确定“应该综合症”的可转移性和新夫妇对尝试新水果和蔬菜的接受程度。了解食物选择的变化背景可以帮助营养专业人士更好地支持健康饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信