Consumer Use of Health-Related Endorsements On Food Labels in the United Kingdom and Australia

Michael Rayner , Annette Boaz , Cathy Higginson
{"title":"Consumer Use of Health-Related Endorsements On Food Labels in the United Kingdom and Australia","authors":"Michael Rayner ,&nbsp;Annette Boaz ,&nbsp;Cathy Higginson","doi":"10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60006-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this research was to examine how consumers use health-related food endorsements on food labels. Three endorsement programs were examined: those of the two major retailers in the United Kingdom, Tesco and Sainsbury's, and the “Pick the Tick” program of the National Heart Foundation of Australia. The main methodology used was protocol analysis. This involves the subject “thinking aloud” while performing a task—in this case, (a) shopping normally and (b) shopping “healthily” for foods on a predetermined list—to generate a protocol. Each subject was also interviewed to investigate reported use of endorsements. Subjects were a quota sample (N = 44) of shoppers representative of the U.K. and Australian populations. Information about the subjects, the protocols, and interview data were analyzed quantitatively; the protocols were also analyzed qualitatively. Sainsbury's and Australian shoppers never used the endorsements when shopping but Tesco shoppers did, albeit rarely. Tesco shoppers used the endorsement in complex ways and not just as a trigger to food selection. They sometimes used the endorsement to reject endorsed foods. Subjects claimed to use the endorsements even though the protocol analysis revealed no actual use. There are features of the Tesco endorsement program that make it more helpful to consumers than the other programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutrition education","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 24-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60006-7","citationCount":"75","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutrition education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404606600067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

Abstract

The objective of this research was to examine how consumers use health-related food endorsements on food labels. Three endorsement programs were examined: those of the two major retailers in the United Kingdom, Tesco and Sainsbury's, and the “Pick the Tick” program of the National Heart Foundation of Australia. The main methodology used was protocol analysis. This involves the subject “thinking aloud” while performing a task—in this case, (a) shopping normally and (b) shopping “healthily” for foods on a predetermined list—to generate a protocol. Each subject was also interviewed to investigate reported use of endorsements. Subjects were a quota sample (N = 44) of shoppers representative of the U.K. and Australian populations. Information about the subjects, the protocols, and interview data were analyzed quantitatively; the protocols were also analyzed qualitatively. Sainsbury's and Australian shoppers never used the endorsements when shopping but Tesco shoppers did, albeit rarely. Tesco shoppers used the endorsement in complex ways and not just as a trigger to food selection. They sometimes used the endorsement to reject endorsed foods. Subjects claimed to use the endorsements even though the protocol analysis revealed no actual use. There are features of the Tesco endorsement program that make it more helpful to consumers than the other programs.

在英国和澳大利亚,消费者在食品标签上使用与健康有关的认可
本研究的目的是调查消费者如何使用食品标签上与健康相关的食品代言。研究人员考察了三个代言项目:英国两大零售商特易购(Tesco)和塞恩斯伯里(Sainsbury)的代言项目,以及澳大利亚国家心脏基金会(National Heart Foundation of Australia)的“挑选Tick”项目。使用的主要方法是方案分析。这需要受试者在执行任务时“自言自语”——在这种情况下,(a)正常购物,(b)“健康”地购买预定清单上的食物——从而生成一个协议。每个受试者还接受了访谈,以调查报告的背书使用情况。受试者是一个配额样本(N = 44)的购物者代表英国和澳大利亚的人口。对研究对象的信息、方案和访谈数据进行定量分析;还对方案进行了定性分析。塞恩斯伯里和澳大利亚的购物者在购物时从未使用过这些代言,但乐购的购物者却很少使用。特易购的顾客以复杂的方式使用这种认可,而不仅仅是作为食物选择的触发因素。他们有时会用背书来拒绝认可的食品。受试者声称使用了背书,即使协议分析显示没有实际使用。Tesco的代言计划有一些特点,使它比其他计划对消费者更有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信