WRITING BEFORE INSCRIBING: ON THE USE OF MANUSCRIPTS IN THE PRODUCTION OF WESTERN ZHOU BRONZE INSCRIPTIONS

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Early China Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/eac.2019.9
Ondřej 安瑞 Škrabal 石
{"title":"WRITING BEFORE INSCRIBING: ON THE USE OF MANUSCRIPTS IN THE PRODUCTION OF WESTERN ZHOU BRONZE INSCRIPTIONS","authors":"Ondřej 安瑞 Škrabal 石","doi":"10.1017/eac.2019.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While research on Warring States, Qin, and Han manuscripts is flourishing, much less is known about the use of manuscripts during the earlier stages of Chinese history, for which material evidence has not been preserved. Based on the layout features and textual anomalies in the Western Zhou bronze inscriptions, this article explores the traces of use of perishable writing supports in the process of the production of bronze inscriptions in this period and reconstructs their functions and physical qualities. Based on the surveyed evidence, the article posits that two distinct exemplar manuscripts were used in the inscription-making process: an original “master copy” that was kept aside for proofreading purposes and a secondary “blueprint” that was employed directly in the technical process of inscription-making. A single blueprint would be used consecutively by several craftsmen to produce a set of inscriptions on different types of vessels. The word count and layout of many inscriptions were already carefully planned during the process of their composition, and any study of a bronze text should therefore begin with the evaluation of its visual qualities. Moreover, this probe provides unambiguous evidence for the use of tube-lining in the inscription-making process and reconstructs the complete chaîne opératoire of bronze inscription production in the Late Western Zhou period. The article also offers insights into the level of literacy and the division of labor in bronze workshops, and touches upon the display function of bronze epigraphy during the Western Zhou period. 提要 近年來,戰國秦漢簡牘研究已成爲熱潮。相比之下,戰國以前寫本由於出土材料的闕失,其使用情況知之甚少。本文根據西周銅器銘文的佈局特徵及異常現象,對銅器銘文製作過程中使用易腐材質寫本的痕跡進行了探討,並對其物理性質及在銘文製作過程中的具體作用進行了復原。基於分析,本文指出在銅器銘文製作過程中使用了兩種不同的寫本:一種是用於審閱的“原稿”;一種是用於銘文實際製作過程的“藍本”。製作一套同銘器時(包括不同器類的器物),工匠們會輪流使用同一份藍本。不少銘文的起草過程中已對銘文字數、文字佈局進行了細心設計,因此,每一篇銘文的釋讀工作應該從考察銘文的視覺特徵入手。此外,本文爲泥條堆塑法在銘文製作過程中的應用提供了明證,復原了西周晚期銅器銘文製作的全部流程。再者,本文還關涉到西周時期銅器作坊中工匠的讀寫能力、勞動分工以及西周時期青銅銘刻的展示功能等問題。","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2019.9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2019.9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While research on Warring States, Qin, and Han manuscripts is flourishing, much less is known about the use of manuscripts during the earlier stages of Chinese history, for which material evidence has not been preserved. Based on the layout features and textual anomalies in the Western Zhou bronze inscriptions, this article explores the traces of use of perishable writing supports in the process of the production of bronze inscriptions in this period and reconstructs their functions and physical qualities. Based on the surveyed evidence, the article posits that two distinct exemplar manuscripts were used in the inscription-making process: an original “master copy” that was kept aside for proofreading purposes and a secondary “blueprint” that was employed directly in the technical process of inscription-making. A single blueprint would be used consecutively by several craftsmen to produce a set of inscriptions on different types of vessels. The word count and layout of many inscriptions were already carefully planned during the process of their composition, and any study of a bronze text should therefore begin with the evaluation of its visual qualities. Moreover, this probe provides unambiguous evidence for the use of tube-lining in the inscription-making process and reconstructs the complete chaîne opératoire of bronze inscription production in the Late Western Zhou period. The article also offers insights into the level of literacy and the division of labor in bronze workshops, and touches upon the display function of bronze epigraphy during the Western Zhou period. 提要 近年來,戰國秦漢簡牘研究已成爲熱潮。相比之下,戰國以前寫本由於出土材料的闕失,其使用情況知之甚少。本文根據西周銅器銘文的佈局特徵及異常現象,對銅器銘文製作過程中使用易腐材質寫本的痕跡進行了探討,並對其物理性質及在銘文製作過程中的具體作用進行了復原。基於分析,本文指出在銅器銘文製作過程中使用了兩種不同的寫本:一種是用於審閱的“原稿”;一種是用於銘文實際製作過程的“藍本”。製作一套同銘器時(包括不同器類的器物),工匠們會輪流使用同一份藍本。不少銘文的起草過程中已對銘文字數、文字佈局進行了細心設計,因此,每一篇銘文的釋讀工作應該從考察銘文的視覺特徵入手。此外,本文爲泥條堆塑法在銘文製作過程中的應用提供了明證,復原了西周晚期銅器銘文製作的全部流程。再者,本文還關涉到西周時期銅器作坊中工匠的讀寫能力、勞動分工以及西周時期青銅銘刻的展示功能等問題。
先写后刻:论西周青铜器铭文制作中手稿的使用
虽然对战国、秦朝和汉朝手稿的研究正在蓬勃发展,但对中国历史早期手稿的使用却知之甚少,这方面的物证也没有保存下来。本文以西周青铜器铭文的布局特征和文字异常为基础,探讨了这一时期青铜器铭文制作过程中易腐文字支架的使用痕迹,重构了其功能和物理性质。根据调查的证据,文章认为在铭文制作过程中使用了两种不同的范例手稿:一种是原始的“主副本”,用于校对目的,另一种是次要的“蓝图”,直接用于铭文制作的技术过程。一幅蓝图将由几个工匠连续使用,在不同类型的容器上制作一套铭文。许多铭文的字数和布局都是在制作过程中精心设计的,因此,对青铜文字的任何研究都应该从评估其视觉质量开始。此外,这一探索为铭文制作过程中使用管衬提供了明确的证据,并重建了西周后期青铜铭文制作的完整的cha ne opacimatire。文章还对西周时期青铜器作坊的文化水平和劳动分工进行了探讨,并对青铜器铭文的展示功能进行了探讨。提要 近年來,戰國秦漢簡牘研究已成爲熱潮。相比之下,戰國以前寫本由於出土材料的闕失,其使用情況知之甚少。本文根據西周銅器銘文的佈局特徵及異常現象,對銅器銘文製作過程中使用易腐材質寫本的痕跡進行了探討,並對其物理性質及在銘文製作過程中的具體作用進行了復原。基於分析,本文指出在銅器銘文製作過程中使用了兩種不同的寫本:一種是用於審閱的“原稿”;一種是用於銘文實際製作過程的“藍本”。製作一套同銘器時(包括不同器類的器物),工匠們會輪流使用同一份藍本。不少銘文的起草過程中已對銘文字數、文字佈局進行了細心設計,因此,每一篇銘文的釋讀工作應該從考察銘文的視覺特徵入手。此外,本文爲泥條堆塑法在銘文製作過程中的應用提供了明證,復原了西周晚期銅器銘文製作的全部流程。再者,本文還關涉到西周時期銅器作坊中工匠的讀寫能力、勞動分工以及西周時期青銅銘刻的展示功能等問題。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early China
Early China ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Early China publishes original research on all aspects of the culture and civilization of China from earliest times through the Han dynasty period (CE 220). The journal is interdisciplinary in scope, including articles on Chinese archaeology, history, philosophy, religion, literature, and paleography. It is the only English-language journal to publish solely on early China, and to include information on all relevant publications in all languages. The journal is of interest to scholars of archaeology and of other ancient cultures as well as sinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信