THE REIFICATION OF FATE IN EARLY CHINA

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Early China Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/eac.2019.6
Mercedes 麗 Valmisa 梅
{"title":"THE REIFICATION OF FATE IN EARLY CHINA","authors":"Mercedes 麗 Valmisa 梅","doi":"10.1017/eac.2019.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Early Chinese texts make us witnesses to debates about the power, or lack thereof, that humans had over the course of events, the outcomes of their actions, and their own lives. In the midst of these discourses on the limits of the efficacy of human agency, the notion of ming 命 took a central position. In this article, I present a common pattern of thinking about the relationship between the person and the world in early China. I call it the reifying pattern because it consisted in thinking about ming as a hypostasized entity with object-like features. Although external and independent, ming was not endowed with human qualities such as the capacities for empathy, responsivity, and intersubjectivity. The reification of fate implied an understanding of ming as an external, amoral, and determining force that limited humans without accepting intercommunication with them, thereby causing feelings of alienation, powerlessness, and existential incompetence. I first show that the different meanings of ming hold a sense of prevailing external reality, and hence can be connected to the overarching meaning of fate. Then, I offer an account of the process of reification of fate in early China and its consequences, theoretical and practical, through cases study of received (Mengzi 孟子) and found (Tang Yu zhi dao 唐虞之道) texts. I end with some reflections on the implications of ming as a nonpersonal and nonsubjective type of actor for both early Chinese and twenty-first-century accounts of agency. 提要 早期中國文本裡有很多關於人類是否對事件的進程、其行動的結果以及他們自己的生活具有影響力的争論。在關於人類能動性功效的爭論中,命的概念佔據了中心位置。在這篇文章中,我提出了一個早期中國關於人類與世界關係的思維範式。我稱其為物化模式,因為它將命視為具類似物體特徵的實體。雖然命是外在和獨立的,但它並不被賦予人性的品質,例如同理心、反應能力和主體間性。命的物化暗示了把命理解为一種外在的、非德的、決定性的力量。這種力量限制了人類而不接受與人類的互動交流,從而導致異化、無力和存在無能的感覺。我首先表明,命的不同含義皆有佔優勢的外在現實感,因此可以與命運(fate)總體意義建立關聯。然後,我通過《孟子》與《唐虞之道》文本的案例研究,提供了早期中國命運的物化過程及其理論與實踐的後果。最後,我提供一些反思,闡明命作為一個非個人和非主體性的能動者對早期中國和廿一世紀的能動性理論有何種影響。","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2019.6","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2019.6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Early Chinese texts make us witnesses to debates about the power, or lack thereof, that humans had over the course of events, the outcomes of their actions, and their own lives. In the midst of these discourses on the limits of the efficacy of human agency, the notion of ming 命 took a central position. In this article, I present a common pattern of thinking about the relationship between the person and the world in early China. I call it the reifying pattern because it consisted in thinking about ming as a hypostasized entity with object-like features. Although external and independent, ming was not endowed with human qualities such as the capacities for empathy, responsivity, and intersubjectivity. The reification of fate implied an understanding of ming as an external, amoral, and determining force that limited humans without accepting intercommunication with them, thereby causing feelings of alienation, powerlessness, and existential incompetence. I first show that the different meanings of ming hold a sense of prevailing external reality, and hence can be connected to the overarching meaning of fate. Then, I offer an account of the process of reification of fate in early China and its consequences, theoretical and practical, through cases study of received (Mengzi 孟子) and found (Tang Yu zhi dao 唐虞之道) texts. I end with some reflections on the implications of ming as a nonpersonal and nonsubjective type of actor for both early Chinese and twenty-first-century accounts of agency. 提要 早期中國文本裡有很多關於人類是否對事件的進程、其行動的結果以及他們自己的生活具有影響力的争論。在關於人類能動性功效的爭論中,命的概念佔據了中心位置。在這篇文章中,我提出了一個早期中國關於人類與世界關係的思維範式。我稱其為物化模式,因為它將命視為具類似物體特徵的實體。雖然命是外在和獨立的,但它並不被賦予人性的品質,例如同理心、反應能力和主體間性。命的物化暗示了把命理解为一種外在的、非德的、決定性的力量。這種力量限制了人類而不接受與人類的互動交流,從而導致異化、無力和存在無能的感覺。我首先表明,命的不同含義皆有佔優勢的外在現實感,因此可以與命運(fate)總體意義建立關聯。然後,我通過《孟子》與《唐虞之道》文本的案例研究,提供了早期中國命運的物化過程及其理論與實踐的後果。最後,我提供一些反思,闡明命作為一個非個人和非主體性的能動者對早期中國和廿一世紀的能動性理論有何種影響。
中国早期命运的物化
早期的中国文本让我们见证了关于人类在事件的过程、行为的结果和自己的生活中所拥有的权力或缺乏权力的争论。在这些关于人类能动性的局限性的论述中,“明”的概念占据了中心位置。在这篇文章中,我提出了一种关于早期中国人与世界关系的普遍思维模式。我称它为具象化模式,因为它包含了将明视为具有对象特征的实体。虽然明是外在的、独立的,但它并没有被赋予人类的特质,如移情能力、反应能力和主体间性。命运的物化意味着对明的理解是一种外在的、非道德的、决定性的力量,它限制了人类而不接受与他们的交流,从而导致了异化、无力和存在的无能。我首先表明,“明”的不同意义具有一种普遍存在的外部现实意义,因此可以与命运的总体意义联系起来。然后,我通过对收到的(《孟子》)和发现的(《唐语之道》虞)文本的案例研究,从理论和实践两方面阐述了中国早期命运物化的过程及其后果。最后,我反思了明作为一个非个人和非主观类型的演员对中国早期和21世纪代理的影响。提要 早期中國文本裡有很多關於人類是否對事件的進程、其行動的結果以及他們自己的生活具有影響力的争論。在關於人類能動性功效的爭論中,命的概念佔據了中心位置。在這篇文章中,我提出了一個早期中國關於人類與世界關係的思維範式。我稱其為物化模式,因為它將命視為具類似物體特徵的實體。雖然命是外在和獨立的,但它並不被賦予人性的品質,例如同理心、反應能力和主體間性。命的物化暗示了把命理解为一種外在的、非德的、決定性的力量。這種力量限制了人類而不接受與人類的互動交流,從而導致異化、無力和存在無能的感覺。我的意思是:“我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是。”然後,我通過《孟子》與《唐虞之道》文本的案例研究,提供了早期中國命運的物化過程及其理論與實踐的後果。最後,我提供一些反思,闡明命作為一個非個人和非主體性的能動者對早期中國和廿一世紀的能動性理論有何種影響。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early China
Early China ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Early China publishes original research on all aspects of the culture and civilization of China from earliest times through the Han dynasty period (CE 220). The journal is interdisciplinary in scope, including articles on Chinese archaeology, history, philosophy, religion, literature, and paleography. It is the only English-language journal to publish solely on early China, and to include information on all relevant publications in all languages. The journal is of interest to scholars of archaeology and of other ancient cultures as well as sinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信