¿Influye la experiencia del operador en la rentabilidad de la broncoscopia en el diagnóstico de lesiones pulmonares focales malignas?

Q4 Medicine
R.M. Díaz Campos , R. García Luján , R. Alonso Moralejo , C. García Quero , E. de Miguel Poch
{"title":"¿Influye la experiencia del operador en la rentabilidad de la broncoscopia en el diagnóstico de lesiones pulmonares focales malignas?","authors":"R.M. Díaz Campos ,&nbsp;R. García Luján ,&nbsp;R. Alonso Moralejo ,&nbsp;C. García Quero ,&nbsp;E. de Miguel Poch","doi":"10.1016/S1576-9895(12)70139-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB) is a useful technique in the diagnosis of focal pulmonary nodules and masses. The profitability of the FB and transbronchial biopsy (TB) is variable and depends on different factors such as the operator's experience. The aim of this study was to determine if the diagnostic profitability of these techniques, in the diagnosis of malignant focal pulmonary lesions (FPL), changed with the incorporation of a new medical staff compared with previous data of our center.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A FPL was defined as an intra - parenchymatous pulmonary lesion that is well circumscribed and completely surrounded by healthy lung.</p><p>We analyzed all the FBs between 02/2008 and 08/2009 in patients with a FPL with a definitive diagnosis of malignancy. 85 patients were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The diagnostic profitability of the TB was 0.55; it was higher when the FPL was &gt; 2<!--> <!-->cm (≤ 2<!--> <!-->cm vs &gt; 2<!--> <!-->cm; 0.38 vs 0.62; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) but no difference was found by site (central vs. peripheral; 0.67 vs 0.54; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.16). The previous profitability of TB was 0.76 without differences by size (≤ 2<!--> <!-->cm vs &gt; 2<!--> <!-->cm; 0.72 vs 0,78; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,48) or site (central vs peripheral; 0.83 vs 0.74; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,39).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that the operator's experience influences in the diagnostic profitability of the TB, in the malignant FPL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37742,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Patologia Respiratoria","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 40-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1576-9895(12)70139-X","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Patologia Respiratoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157698951270139X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB) is a useful technique in the diagnosis of focal pulmonary nodules and masses. The profitability of the FB and transbronchial biopsy (TB) is variable and depends on different factors such as the operator's experience. The aim of this study was to determine if the diagnostic profitability of these techniques, in the diagnosis of malignant focal pulmonary lesions (FPL), changed with the incorporation of a new medical staff compared with previous data of our center.

Material and methods

A FPL was defined as an intra - parenchymatous pulmonary lesion that is well circumscribed and completely surrounded by healthy lung.

We analyzed all the FBs between 02/2008 and 08/2009 in patients with a FPL with a definitive diagnosis of malignancy. 85 patients were included.

Results

The diagnostic profitability of the TB was 0.55; it was higher when the FPL was > 2 cm (≤ 2 cm vs > 2 cm; 0.38 vs 0.62; p = 0.02) but no difference was found by site (central vs. peripheral; 0.67 vs 0.54; p = 0.16). The previous profitability of TB was 0.76 without differences by size (≤ 2 cm vs > 2 cm; 0.72 vs 0,78; p = 0,48) or site (central vs peripheral; 0.83 vs 0.74; p = 0,39).

Conclusion

We conclude that the operator's experience influences in the diagnostic profitability of the TB, in the malignant FPL.

在诊断恶性局灶性肺病变时,操作人员的经验是否影响支气管镜检查的盈利能力?
纤维支气管镜(FB)是诊断局灶性肺结节和肿块的有效技术。FB和经支气管活检(TB)的盈利能力是可变的,取决于不同的因素,如操作员的经验。本研究的目的是确定这些技术在诊断恶性局灶性肺病变(FPL)时的诊断价值是否随着新医务人员的加入而改变,并与本中心以往的数据进行比较。材料与方法FPL被定义为肺实质内病变,被健康肺完全包围。我们分析了2008年2月至2009年8月间确诊为恶性肿瘤的FPL患者的所有FBs。纳入85例患者。结果结核的诊断利润率为0.55;当FPL为>2cm(≤2cm vs >2厘米;0.38 vs 0.62;P = 0.02),但没有发现部位差异(中央vs外周;0.67 vs 0.54;p = 0.16)。TB的先前盈利能力为0.76,没有大小差异(≤2 cm vs >2厘米;0.72 vs 0.78;P = 0,48)或部位(中心vs外围;0.83 vs 0.74;p = 0,39)。结论手术人员的经验对结核病恶性FPL的诊断能力有一定影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Patologia Respiratoria
Revista de Patologia Respiratoria Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Revista de Patología Respiratoria is the scientific journal of the Madrilenian Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery Society (Neumomadrid). It will consider those original articles related to Pulmonology, Thoracic Surgery and all other related sciences for their possible publication. Other types of articles such as reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters and letters to the editor are also published in the journal. It is a quarterly Journal that publishes a total of 4 issues, which contain these types of articles to different extents. All publications submitted will always undergo a peer review and a final decision will be made according to comments from the expert reviewers and members of the Editorial Board. The Journal is published both in Spanish and English. Therefore, the submission of manuscripts written in either Spanish or English is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信