Providing the Right Infrastructure to Lead the Culture Change for Patient Safety

Peter Wong PhD, MBA, RPh (Vice President), Dena Helsinger RN, MS (Director), Jeff Petry MD (Chairperson)
{"title":"Providing the Right Infrastructure to Lead the Culture Change for Patient Safety","authors":"Peter Wong PhD, MBA, RPh (Vice President),&nbsp;Dena Helsinger RN, MS (Director),&nbsp;Jeff Petry MD (Chairperson)","doi":"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28036-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In early 2000 the hospital leadership of Good Samaritan Hospital (GSH), a community teaching hospital in Dayton, Ohio, made patient safety a strategic priority and devoted resources to incorporate safety as a part of the hospital's culture and care processes. The vice president of clinical effectiveness and performance improvement, as a champion for safety, led a consensus-building effort to enlist the support of key physician and hospital leaders to a safety program. GSH added a Safety Board to its administrative infrastructure, which was to serve as an oversight body to ensure the advance of the safety program and to produce policies and procedures that are associated with safety.</p></div><div><h3>Addressing patient safety aims</h3><p>To assess GSH's progress toward achieving three aims—demonstrate patient safety as a top leadership priority, promote a nonpunitive culture for sharing information and lessons learned, and implement an integrated patient safety program throughout the organization—the Safety Board evaluates GSH's performance bimonthly, using a 5-point-scaled self-assessment tool. For example, for the third aim, the Safety Board oversaw the formation of three subcommittees, which were to test ideas and achieve improvements in three areas—medication, clinical, and environmental.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The administrative structure provides the leadership and momentum necessary to fuel a cultural change in the way that patient safety issues are perceived and acted on throughout the organization. “To err” may be human, but so is the ability to increase patient safety awareness, to promote cultural change within existing systems, and to improve the patient care processes and outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79382,"journal":{"name":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","volume":"28 7","pages":"Pages 363-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28036-0","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Background

In early 2000 the hospital leadership of Good Samaritan Hospital (GSH), a community teaching hospital in Dayton, Ohio, made patient safety a strategic priority and devoted resources to incorporate safety as a part of the hospital's culture and care processes. The vice president of clinical effectiveness and performance improvement, as a champion for safety, led a consensus-building effort to enlist the support of key physician and hospital leaders to a safety program. GSH added a Safety Board to its administrative infrastructure, which was to serve as an oversight body to ensure the advance of the safety program and to produce policies and procedures that are associated with safety.

Addressing patient safety aims

To assess GSH's progress toward achieving three aims—demonstrate patient safety as a top leadership priority, promote a nonpunitive culture for sharing information and lessons learned, and implement an integrated patient safety program throughout the organization—the Safety Board evaluates GSH's performance bimonthly, using a 5-point-scaled self-assessment tool. For example, for the third aim, the Safety Board oversaw the formation of three subcommittees, which were to test ideas and achieve improvements in three areas—medication, clinical, and environmental.

Discussion

The administrative structure provides the leadership and momentum necessary to fuel a cultural change in the way that patient safety issues are perceived and acted on throughout the organization. “To err” may be human, but so is the ability to increase patient safety awareness, to promote cultural change within existing systems, and to improve the patient care processes and outcomes.

提供合适的基础设施,引领患者安全文化变革
2000年初,俄亥俄州代顿市的社区教学医院好撒玛利亚人医院(GSH)的医院领导层将患者安全作为一项战略重点,并投入资源将安全纳入医院文化和护理流程的一部分。作为安全的倡导者,负责临床有效性和绩效改进的副总裁领导了一项建立共识的努力,以争取主要医生和医院领导对安全计划的支持。GSH在其行政基础设施中增加了一个安全委员会,作为一个监督机构,以确保安全计划的推进,并制定与安全相关的政策和程序。解决患者安全目标为了评估GSH在实现三个目标方面的进展-将患者安全作为最高领导优先事项,促进共享信息和经验教训的非惩罚性文化,并在整个组织内实施综合患者安全计划-安全委员会使用5分制自我评估工具,每两个月评估GSH的绩效。例如,为了实现第三个目标,安全委员会监督了三个小组委员会的成立,这些小组委员会将在三个领域——药物、临床和环境——测试各种想法并取得改进。行政结构提供了必要的领导和动力,以推动整个组织对患者安全问题的认知和行动方式的文化变革。“犯错”可能是人的本性,但提高患者安全意识、促进现有系统内的文化变革以及改善患者护理过程和结果的能力也是人的本性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信