The social pregnancy interaction model: conceptualizing cognitive, social and cultural barriers to prenatal care

Applied behavioral science review Pub Date : 1996-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-10-22 DOI:10.1016/S1068-8595(96)80018-3
James D. Campbell, Joseph B. Stanford, Bernard Ewigman
{"title":"The social pregnancy interaction model: conceptualizing cognitive, social and cultural barriers to prenatal care","authors":"James D. Campbell,&nbsp;Joseph B. Stanford,&nbsp;Bernard Ewigman","doi":"10.1016/S1068-8595(96)80018-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although prenatal care appears to improve perinatal outcome, many women fail to seek care. Research has established the importance of removing structural barriers for women by improving financial access, establishing providers of care, and providing transportation. Such steps are essential, but not sufficient to ensure that all women receive adequate prenatal care. Individual experiences, attitudes, beliefs, social setting, and culture are important in the decision to seek prenatal care. Most research on these nonstructural barriers to prenatal care, however, has been limited by the use of inadequate instruments and retrospective and cross-sectional collection of data. More importantly, this field of inquiry lacks a comprehensive theoretical framework to guide its research agenda. In this paper, we propose the social pregnancy interaction model (SPIM), a theoretical model for predicting the utilization of prenatal care which incorporates the theory of reasoned action and the concept of social pregnancy from symbolic interaction theory. The SPIM illustrates that a woman's decision to initiate prenatal care occurs within a social, cultural, and historical context that depends on social interpretations. If validated, this model has the potential to increase our understanding of the process of initiating prenatal care, to provide much greater predictive power in anticipating the use of prenatal care, and to facilitate the development and evaluation of effective approaches to increase the early utilization and continuation of prenatal care in a variety of cultural, social, and economic settings. The model also may be useful for studying other issues surrounding pregnancy such as family planning, contraceptive behavior, infertility, and elective abortion. We conclude by framing a research agenda and posing a series of research questions that emerge from this model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84178,"journal":{"name":"Applied behavioral science review","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 81-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1068-8595(96)80018-3","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied behavioral science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1068859596800183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Although prenatal care appears to improve perinatal outcome, many women fail to seek care. Research has established the importance of removing structural barriers for women by improving financial access, establishing providers of care, and providing transportation. Such steps are essential, but not sufficient to ensure that all women receive adequate prenatal care. Individual experiences, attitudes, beliefs, social setting, and culture are important in the decision to seek prenatal care. Most research on these nonstructural barriers to prenatal care, however, has been limited by the use of inadequate instruments and retrospective and cross-sectional collection of data. More importantly, this field of inquiry lacks a comprehensive theoretical framework to guide its research agenda. In this paper, we propose the social pregnancy interaction model (SPIM), a theoretical model for predicting the utilization of prenatal care which incorporates the theory of reasoned action and the concept of social pregnancy from symbolic interaction theory. The SPIM illustrates that a woman's decision to initiate prenatal care occurs within a social, cultural, and historical context that depends on social interpretations. If validated, this model has the potential to increase our understanding of the process of initiating prenatal care, to provide much greater predictive power in anticipating the use of prenatal care, and to facilitate the development and evaluation of effective approaches to increase the early utilization and continuation of prenatal care in a variety of cultural, social, and economic settings. The model also may be useful for studying other issues surrounding pregnancy such as family planning, contraceptive behavior, infertility, and elective abortion. We conclude by framing a research agenda and posing a series of research questions that emerge from this model.

社会怀孕互动模式:概念化产前护理的认知、社会和文化障碍
虽然产前护理似乎可以改善围产期结局,但许多妇女未能寻求护理。研究已经确定了通过改善财务渠道、建立护理提供者和提供交通来消除妇女结构性障碍的重要性。这些步骤是必要的,但不足以确保所有妇女都得到适当的产前护理。个人经历、态度、信仰、社会环境和文化对寻求产前护理的决定都很重要。然而,大多数关于这些产前护理的非结构性障碍的研究都受到使用不充分的仪器和回顾性和横断面数据收集的限制。更重要的是,这一研究领域缺乏一个全面的理论框架来指导其研究议程。本文提出了社会怀孕互动模型(social pregnancy interaction model, SPIM),这是一个预测产前护理利用的理论模型,它将理性行为理论与符号互动理论中的社会怀孕概念相结合。SPIM表明,妇女决定开始产前护理是在社会、文化和历史背景下进行的,这取决于社会的解释。如果得到验证,该模型有可能增加我们对启动产前护理过程的理解,为预测产前护理的使用提供更大的预测能力,并促进有效方法的开发和评估,以增加产前护理在各种文化,社会和经济环境中的早期利用和持续。该模型也可用于研究与怀孕有关的其他问题,如计划生育、避孕行为、不孕症和选择性流产。最后,我们制定了一个研究议程,并提出了一系列从这个模型中产生的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书