A comparison of methods for the evaluation of significance: Evidence from organizational change interventions

Applied behavioral science review Pub Date : 1996-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-10-22 DOI:10.1016/S1068-8595(96)80015-8
Daniel J. Svyantek, Steven E. Ekeberg, Roberto F. Figueroa, Michael E. Marinis
{"title":"A comparison of methods for the evaluation of significance: Evidence from organizational change interventions","authors":"Daniel J. Svyantek,&nbsp;Steven E. Ekeberg,&nbsp;Roberto F. Figueroa,&nbsp;Michael E. Marinis","doi":"10.1016/S1068-8595(96)80015-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current statistical methods are complemented by Bayesian statistical methods when evaluating change in applied settings. Bayesian methods are a flexible tool for investigating the effects of change interventions. Bayesian statistics may be used to simultaneously test the statistical and practical significance of change in organizations. A description of the evaluation of a three-year study in six manufacturing plants of a large, United States corporation is provided. The results of traditional statistical methods are compared to Bayesian statistics for this field study. A discussion of (1) the results of this evaluation and (2) the applicability of the Bayesian approach for the evaluation of organizational change is presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84178,"journal":{"name":"Applied behavioral science review","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 23-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1068-8595(96)80015-8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied behavioral science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1068859596800158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current statistical methods are complemented by Bayesian statistical methods when evaluating change in applied settings. Bayesian methods are a flexible tool for investigating the effects of change interventions. Bayesian statistics may be used to simultaneously test the statistical and practical significance of change in organizations. A description of the evaluation of a three-year study in six manufacturing plants of a large, United States corporation is provided. The results of traditional statistical methods are compared to Bayesian statistics for this field study. A discussion of (1) the results of this evaluation and (2) the applicability of the Bayesian approach for the evaluation of organizational change is presented.

显著性评价方法的比较:来自组织变革干预的证据
在评估应用环境的变化时,贝叶斯统计方法补充了当前的统计方法。贝叶斯方法是一种灵活的工具,用于调查变化干预的影响。贝叶斯统计可以用来同时检验组织中变化的统计意义和实际意义。本文介绍了对美国一家大型公司的六个制造厂进行的为期三年的研究的评价情况。将传统统计方法的结果与贝叶斯统计方法进行了比较。本文讨论了(1)评估结果和(2)贝叶斯方法对组织变革评估的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书