Anticipation effects of looming public-pension reforms

Monika Bütler
{"title":"Anticipation effects of looming public-pension reforms","authors":"Monika Bütler","doi":"10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00024-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In many countries, current unfunded public pension systems are unsustainable. Though agents recognize that fiscal imbalances will be eliminated sooner or later, the timing of reforms and future policy mixes are typically unknown. The paper proposes a tractable framework to study forthcoming but ill-specified events, such as a crisis in the pension system, within a macroeconomic model based on individual life-cycle optimization. The uncertainty about the timing of a future stabilization is modeled by a subjective hazard function where the state-dependent hazard rate depends on a measure of the public-pension system's expected net liabilities. Using Switzerland as a motivating example, the model is calibrated and simulated under a number of alternative policy options and different perception patterns. Expectations prior to a reform are shown to have large impacts on aggregate variables and on cross-generations profiles of consumption and labor supply. In comparison to well-specified pre-announced stabilization policies, timing uncertainty and misperceptions can lead to welfare losses, in particular for the middle-aged and the elderly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100218,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 119-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00024-X","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016722319900024X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

In many countries, current unfunded public pension systems are unsustainable. Though agents recognize that fiscal imbalances will be eliminated sooner or later, the timing of reforms and future policy mixes are typically unknown. The paper proposes a tractable framework to study forthcoming but ill-specified events, such as a crisis in the pension system, within a macroeconomic model based on individual life-cycle optimization. The uncertainty about the timing of a future stabilization is modeled by a subjective hazard function where the state-dependent hazard rate depends on a measure of the public-pension system's expected net liabilities. Using Switzerland as a motivating example, the model is calibrated and simulated under a number of alternative policy options and different perception patterns. Expectations prior to a reform are shown to have large impacts on aggregate variables and on cross-generations profiles of consumption and labor supply. In comparison to well-specified pre-announced stabilization policies, timing uncertainty and misperceptions can lead to welfare losses, in particular for the middle-aged and the elderly.

即将到来的公共养老金改革的预期效应
在许多国家,目前没有资金的公共养老金制度是不可持续的。尽管代理人认识到财政失衡迟早会消除,但改革的时机和未来的政策组合通常是未知的。本文提出了一个易于处理的框架,在基于个人生命周期优化的宏观经济模型中研究即将发生但不明确的事件,例如养老金制度的危机。未来稳定时间的不确定性通过主观风险函数来建模,其中依赖于国家的风险率取决于公共养老金系统预期净负债的衡量标准。以瑞士为例,在若干备选政策方案和不同的认知模式下对该模型进行了校准和模拟。研究表明,改革前的预期对总变量以及消费和劳动力供给的代际分布有很大的影响。与事先明确宣布的稳定政策相比,时机的不确定性和误解可能导致福利损失,尤其是对中老年人而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信