Tonic immobility in feral and domestic dutch rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), mountain cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttalli), and whitetail jackrabbit (Lepus townsendi) as a function of posture

Ian Q. Whishaw, Nick Previsich, Kelly P. Flannigan
{"title":"Tonic immobility in feral and domestic dutch rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), mountain cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttalli), and whitetail jackrabbit (Lepus townsendi) as a function of posture","authors":"Ian Q. Whishaw,&nbsp;Nick Previsich,&nbsp;Kelly P. Flannigan","doi":"10.1016/S0091-6773(78)92941-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Durations of tonic immobility in back, side, front, and sit postures were collected from domestic and feral rabbits (<em>Oryctolagus cuniculus</em>), cottontail (<em>Sylvilagus nuttalli</em>), and hare (<em>Lepus townsendi</em>). The results suggest that there is a similarity in the immobility behavior displayed by the three genera of Leporidae. All of the animals would remain immobile when placed in the different postures. Overall durations of immobility were longer in the wild animals than in the domestic animals. Longest durations of immobility in rabbits occurred when they were placed in the back posture, while durations tended to be longer in cottontail and hare placed in the front posture. The wild animals also showed less spontaneous activity in the test situation than the domestic animals. The results seem consistent with the idea that immobility behavior in response to restraint might serve an anti-predator function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75577,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral biology","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0091-6773(78)92941-3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091677378929413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Durations of tonic immobility in back, side, front, and sit postures were collected from domestic and feral rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttalli), and hare (Lepus townsendi). The results suggest that there is a similarity in the immobility behavior displayed by the three genera of Leporidae. All of the animals would remain immobile when placed in the different postures. Overall durations of immobility were longer in the wild animals than in the domestic animals. Longest durations of immobility in rabbits occurred when they were placed in the back posture, while durations tended to be longer in cottontail and hare placed in the front posture. The wild animals also showed less spontaneous activity in the test situation than the domestic animals. The results seem consistent with the idea that immobility behavior in response to restraint might serve an anti-predator function.

野生和家养荷兰兔(Oryctolagus cuniculus)、山棉兔(Sylvilagus nuttalli)和白尾大野兔(Lepus townsendi)的补益静止作为姿势的功能
采集家兔、野兔(Oryctolagus cuniculus)、棉尾兔(Sylvilagus nutalli)和野兔(Lepus townsendi)背部、侧面、前部和坐姿的强直性静止时间。结果表明,三属狐猴的不动行为具有相似性。所有的动物在摆出不同的姿势时都保持不动。野生动物的总体静止时间比家养动物长。兔的静止时间最长发生在它们被放置在后面的姿势,而持续时间往往更长在棉尾和被放置在前面的姿势。野生动物在测试情境下的自发活动也低于家养动物。研究结果似乎与不动行为对约束的反应可能具有反捕食者功能的观点相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信