Differences between psychiatric disorders in the clinical and functional effectiveness of an acute psychiatric day hospital, for acutely ill psychiatric patients

Javier Vázquez-Bourgon , Elsa Gómez Ruiz , Fernando Hoyuela Zatón , Luis Salvador Carulla , Rosa Ayesa Arriola , Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez , Benedicto Crespo Facorro
{"title":"Differences between psychiatric disorders in the clinical and functional effectiveness of an acute psychiatric day hospital, for acutely ill psychiatric patients","authors":"Javier Vázquez-Bourgon ,&nbsp;Elsa Gómez Ruiz ,&nbsp;Fernando Hoyuela Zatón ,&nbsp;Luis Salvador Carulla ,&nbsp;Rosa Ayesa Arriola ,&nbsp;Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;Benedicto Crespo Facorro","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsmen.2019.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Intensive treatment in acute day-care psychiatric units may represent an efficient alternative to inpatient care. However, there is evidence suggesting that this clinical resource may not be equally effective for every psychiatric disorder.</p><p>The primary aim of this study was to explore differences between main psychiatric diagnostic groups, in the effectiveness of an acute partial hospitalization program. And, to identify predictors of treatment response.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The study was conducted at an acute psychiatric day hospital. Clinical severity was assessed using BPRS, CGI, and the HoNOS scales. Main socio-demographic variables were also recorded. Patients were clustered into 4<!--> <!-->wide diagnostic groups (i.e.: non-affective psychosis; bipolar; depressive; and personality disorders) to facilitate statistical analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 331 participants were recruited, 115 of whom (34.7%) were diagnosed with non-affective psychosis, 97 (28.3%) with bipolar disorder, 92 (27.8%) with affective disorder, and 27 (8.2%) with personality disorder. Patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder showed greater improvement in BPRS (<em>F</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->5.30; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and CGI (<em>F</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8.78; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) than those suffering from psychosis or depressive disorder. Longer length of stay in the day-hospital, and greater baseline BPRS severity, were identified as predictors of good clinical response. Thirty-day readmission rate was 3%; at long-term (6 months after discharge) only 11.8% (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->39) of patients were re-admitted to a psychiatric hospitalization unit, and no differences were observed between diagnostic groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intensive care in an acute psychiatric day hospital is feasible and effective for patients suffering from an acute mental disorder. However, this effectiveness differs between diagnostic groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101104,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 40-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rpsmen.2019.04.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505021000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Intensive treatment in acute day-care psychiatric units may represent an efficient alternative to inpatient care. However, there is evidence suggesting that this clinical resource may not be equally effective for every psychiatric disorder.

The primary aim of this study was to explore differences between main psychiatric diagnostic groups, in the effectiveness of an acute partial hospitalization program. And, to identify predictors of treatment response.

Material and methods

The study was conducted at an acute psychiatric day hospital. Clinical severity was assessed using BPRS, CGI, and the HoNOS scales. Main socio-demographic variables were also recorded. Patients were clustered into 4 wide diagnostic groups (i.e.: non-affective psychosis; bipolar; depressive; and personality disorders) to facilitate statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 331 participants were recruited, 115 of whom (34.7%) were diagnosed with non-affective psychosis, 97 (28.3%) with bipolar disorder, 92 (27.8%) with affective disorder, and 27 (8.2%) with personality disorder. Patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder showed greater improvement in BPRS (F = 5.30; P = 0.001) and CGI (F = 8.78; P < 0.001) than those suffering from psychosis or depressive disorder. Longer length of stay in the day-hospital, and greater baseline BPRS severity, were identified as predictors of good clinical response. Thirty-day readmission rate was 3%; at long-term (6 months after discharge) only 11.8% (N = 39) of patients were re-admitted to a psychiatric hospitalization unit, and no differences were observed between diagnostic groups.

Conclusions

Intensive care in an acute psychiatric day hospital is feasible and effective for patients suffering from an acute mental disorder. However, this effectiveness differs between diagnostic groups.

急性精神科日间医院对急性精神病患者的临床和功能疗效的差异
急性日间护理精神科的强化治疗可能是住院治疗的有效替代。然而,有证据表明,这种临床资源可能并不对每一种精神疾病都同样有效。本研究的主要目的是探讨主要精神病诊断组在急性部分住院治疗方案有效性方面的差异。并且,确定治疗反应的预测因子。材料与方法本研究在一家急性精神科日间医院进行。采用BPRS、CGI和HoNOS量表评估临床严重程度。还记录了主要的社会人口变量。患者被分为4个广泛的诊断组(即:非情感性精神病;双相情感;抑郁;以及人格障碍)来促进统计分析。结果共纳入331例受试者,其中非情感性精神病115例(34.7%),双相情感障碍97例(28.3%),情感性障碍92例(27.8%),人格障碍27例(8.2%)。诊断为双相情感障碍的患者BPRS改善更大(F = 5.30;P = 0.001)和CGI (F = 8.78;P & lt;0.001),高于精神病或抑郁症患者。较长的日间住院时间和较高的基线BPRS严重程度被确定为良好临床反应的预测因素。30天再入院率为3%;在长期(出院后6个月),只有11.8% (N = 39)的患者再次入住精神科住院单元,诊断组之间无差异。结论急性精神科日间医院重症监护对急性精神障碍患者是可行和有效的。然而,这种有效性在不同的诊断组之间是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信