Assessing the nutritional information for children younger than two years old available on popular websites

Gisele da Silva Gomes Monteiro , Maíra Macário de Assis , Maria Alvim Leite , Larissa Loures Mendes
{"title":"Assessing the nutritional information for children younger than two years old available on popular websites","authors":"Gisele da Silva Gomes Monteiro ,&nbsp;Maíra Macário de Assis ,&nbsp;Maria Alvim Leite ,&nbsp;Larissa Loures Mendes","doi":"10.1016/j.rppede.2016.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze whether the information found on popular Internet sites are in accordance with the steps recommended by the Food Guide for Children Younger than Two Years of the Ministry of Health (2010).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive/comparative study, carried out between August and October 2014, which carried out a search for popular sites (for lay people) in Portuguese, containing information on nutrition of children younger than two years. The Google search engine was used. These findings were compared with the Food Guide for Children Younger than Two Years of the Ministry of Health (2010). It was verified whether the information shown on the websites was in accordance with the Guide.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 50 sites were analyzed, including blogs, food company websites and websites specialized in child nutrition. Only 10% of those pages correctly showed every step of the Food Guide. The recommendations were: exclusive breastfeeding up to six months of life (80%); complementary feeding from six months of life (36%); baby food consistency according to the guide (48%); encouraging the consumption of fruits and vegetables daily (60%). Regarding the complementary feeding safety and hygiene, 26% contained correct information. Only 36% correctly warned about which foods should be avoided in the first years of life.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The information found on the sites is largely in disagreement with the Ministry of Health recommendations, which can lead to misconceptions in the nutritional care of the children younger than two years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101120,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 287-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppede.2016.03.004","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2359348216000282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective

To analyze whether the information found on popular Internet sites are in accordance with the steps recommended by the Food Guide for Children Younger than Two Years of the Ministry of Health (2010).

Methods

Descriptive/comparative study, carried out between August and October 2014, which carried out a search for popular sites (for lay people) in Portuguese, containing information on nutrition of children younger than two years. The Google search engine was used. These findings were compared with the Food Guide for Children Younger than Two Years of the Ministry of Health (2010). It was verified whether the information shown on the websites was in accordance with the Guide.

Results

A total of 50 sites were analyzed, including blogs, food company websites and websites specialized in child nutrition. Only 10% of those pages correctly showed every step of the Food Guide. The recommendations were: exclusive breastfeeding up to six months of life (80%); complementary feeding from six months of life (36%); baby food consistency according to the guide (48%); encouraging the consumption of fruits and vegetables daily (60%). Regarding the complementary feeding safety and hygiene, 26% contained correct information. Only 36% correctly warned about which foods should be avoided in the first years of life.

Conclusions

The information found on the sites is largely in disagreement with the Ministry of Health recommendations, which can lead to misconceptions in the nutritional care of the children younger than two years.

评估流行网站上两岁以下儿童的营养信息
目的分析流行网站上的信息是否符合卫生部2010年《2岁以下儿童食品指南》建议的步骤。方法描述性/比较性研究,于2014年8月至10月进行,对葡萄牙语流行网站(非专业人士)进行搜索,其中包含两岁以下儿童的营养信息。使用谷歌搜索引擎。这些发现与卫生部的《两岁以下儿童食物指南》(2010年)进行了比较。核实网站上显示的信息是否与《指南》相符。结果共分析了50个网站,包括博客、食品公司网站和儿童营养专业网站。这些页面中只有10%正确地展示了食物指南的每一步。建议是:纯母乳喂养至6个月(80%);6个月开始补充喂养(36%);根据指南的婴儿食品稠度(48%);鼓励每天食用水果和蔬菜(60%)。在补充喂养安全和卫生方面,26%的信息正确。只有36%的人正确地警告了在生命的最初几年应该避免哪些食物。结论:在这些网站上发现的信息与卫生部的建议在很大程度上是不一致的,这可能导致对两岁以下儿童营养护理的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信