Care needs of children with disabilities – Use of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory

Fernanda Moreira Teles, Rosa Resegue, Rosana Fiorini Puccini
{"title":"Care needs of children with disabilities – Use of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory","authors":"Fernanda Moreira Teles,&nbsp;Rosa Resegue,&nbsp;Rosana Fiorini Puccini","doi":"10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the care needs reported by caregivers of children with disabilities going through the school inclusion process using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study with 181 children aged 7–10 years with physical or mental disabilities, undergoing the inclusion process in elementary school in 2007. Location: 31 schools of the Regional Education Board–District of Penha, East Side the city of São Paulo. The children's care needs according to the caregivers were assessed in three areas–self-care, mobility and social function, using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, according to the following score: 5, Independent; 4, Supervision; 3, Minimum Assistance; 2, Moderate Assistance; 1, Maximum Assistance and 0, Total Assistance. For statistical analysis, we used Student's <em>t</em>-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA), with <em>p</em>&lt;0.05 being statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The lower means, with statistically significant differences, were observed for the items related to social function (55.8–72.0), followed by self-care functions (56.0–96.5); for all types of disabilities, except for children with physical disabilities, who had lower means for self-care (56.0) and mobility (63.8).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Social function was the area referred to as the one that needed a higher degree of assistance from the caregiver and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory is a tool that can help identify these needs and develop a more targeted intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101120,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 447-453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.015","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2359348216000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

To describe the care needs reported by caregivers of children with disabilities going through the school inclusion process using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory.

Methods

Cross-sectional study with 181 children aged 7–10 years with physical or mental disabilities, undergoing the inclusion process in elementary school in 2007. Location: 31 schools of the Regional Education Board–District of Penha, East Side the city of São Paulo. The children's care needs according to the caregivers were assessed in three areas–self-care, mobility and social function, using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, according to the following score: 5, Independent; 4, Supervision; 3, Minimum Assistance; 2, Moderate Assistance; 1, Maximum Assistance and 0, Total Assistance. For statistical analysis, we used Student's t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA), with p<0.05 being statistically significant.

Results

The lower means, with statistically significant differences, were observed for the items related to social function (55.8–72.0), followed by self-care functions (56.0–96.5); for all types of disabilities, except for children with physical disabilities, who had lower means for self-care (56.0) and mobility (63.8).

Conclusions

Social function was the area referred to as the one that needed a higher degree of assistance from the caregiver and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory is a tool that can help identify these needs and develop a more targeted intervention.

残疾儿童的护理需求——儿童残疾评估量表的使用
目的利用《儿童残疾评估量表》描述残疾儿童入学融合过程中照顾者报告的照顾需求。方法采用横断面研究方法,对2007年在小学接受融合治疗的181名7 ~ 10岁身体或精神残疾儿童进行调查。地点:31所学校的区域教育委员会-区Penha,东侧的城市圣保罗。采用《儿童残疾评估量表》,从自理、行动能力和社会功能三个方面对照顾者对儿童的照顾需求进行评估,得分为:5分,独立;4、监督;3、最低援助;2、适度援助;1,最大援助和0,总援助。统计分析采用Student’st检验和方差分析(ANOVA),其中p<0.05具有统计学意义。结果社会功能相关项均值较低(55.8 ~ 72.0),自我照顾功能次之(56.0 ~ 96.5),差异有统计学意义;除身体残疾儿童外,所有残疾人士的自理能力(56.0分)及行动能力(63.8分)均较低。社会功能被认为是需要照顾者更高程度帮助的领域,儿科残疾评估量表是一个工具,可以帮助识别这些需求并制定更有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信