Magistral drugs in hospitalized newborns and children

Agueda Cabral de Souza Pereira, Elaine Silva Miranda, Selma Rodrigues de Castilho, Débora Omena Futuro, Lenise Arneiro Teixeira, Geraldo Renato de Paula
{"title":"Magistral drugs in hospitalized newborns and children","authors":"Agueda Cabral de Souza Pereira,&nbsp;Elaine Silva Miranda,&nbsp;Selma Rodrigues de Castilho,&nbsp;Débora Omena Futuro,&nbsp;Lenise Arneiro Teixeira,&nbsp;Geraldo Renato de Paula","doi":"10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Study the use of magistral oral solutions and suspensions in infants and children at a university hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a descriptive study based on the analysis of the assessed hospital's magistral drug request forms regarding the patients in the neonatal ICU, Obstetrics, Pediatrics and Pediatric Emergency from January 2012 to December 2013. The frequency of drug requests and dispensation was evaluated and the consumption of each active ingredient of the preparations was expressed as number of “infant defined daily dose” (iDDD) and of iDDD/100 bed-days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 657 forms were analyzed – a monthly average of 27 pediatric preparations. The neonatal ICU accounted for 69.6% of these requests. Twenty-one drug items were used, of which the most common were folinic acid (88 requests), sulfadiazine (85) and captopril (73). The consumption of the active principle in these preparations varied in number of iDDD, from 7.5 (hydralazine) to 16,520.0 (folic acid), and in number of iDDD/100 bed-days in the neonatal ICU, from 0.1 (zinc sulfate) to 146.1 (folic acid).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The constant consumption of magistral oral solutions and suspensions by newborns and children of the assessed hospital indicates the need for such preparations as a pediatric therapeutic alternative in this hospital.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101120,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 403-407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.012","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2359348216000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

Study the use of magistral oral solutions and suspensions in infants and children at a university hospital.

Methods

This is a descriptive study based on the analysis of the assessed hospital's magistral drug request forms regarding the patients in the neonatal ICU, Obstetrics, Pediatrics and Pediatric Emergency from January 2012 to December 2013. The frequency of drug requests and dispensation was evaluated and the consumption of each active ingredient of the preparations was expressed as number of “infant defined daily dose” (iDDD) and of iDDD/100 bed-days.

Results

A total of 657 forms were analyzed – a monthly average of 27 pediatric preparations. The neonatal ICU accounted for 69.6% of these requests. Twenty-one drug items were used, of which the most common were folinic acid (88 requests), sulfadiazine (85) and captopril (73). The consumption of the active principle in these preparations varied in number of iDDD, from 7.5 (hydralazine) to 16,520.0 (folic acid), and in number of iDDD/100 bed-days in the neonatal ICU, from 0.1 (zinc sulfate) to 146.1 (folic acid).

Conclusions

The constant consumption of magistral oral solutions and suspensions by newborns and children of the assessed hospital indicates the need for such preparations as a pediatric therapeutic alternative in this hospital.

住院新生儿和儿童的主要药物
目的了解某大学附属医院婴幼儿口服液及混悬液的使用情况。方法对2012年1月至2013年12月被评估医院对新生儿ICU、产科、儿科和儿科急诊科患者的行政药品申请单进行分析,采用描述性研究方法。评估了药物请求和分配的频率,并将制剂中每种活性成分的消耗量表示为“婴儿限定日剂量”(iDDD)和iDDD/100个床日。结果共分析657份表格,平均每月27份儿科制剂。新生儿ICU占这些请求的69.6%。使用药物21项,其中最常见的是亚叶酸(88项)、磺胺嘧啶(85项)和卡托普利(73项)。这些制剂中活性成分的消耗量在iDDD的数量上有所不同,从7.5(肼)到16,520.0(叶酸),在新生儿ICU的iDDD/100个床日的数量上,从0.1(硫酸锌)到146.1(叶酸)。结论该医院的新生儿和儿童持续使用马司特尔口服液和悬浮液,表明该医院需要将此类制剂作为儿科治疗的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信