Cerebral blood flow assessment of preterm infants during respiratory therapy with the expiratory flow increase technique

Mariana Almada Bassani , Jamil Pedro Siqueira Caldas , Abimael Aranha Netto , Sérgio Tadeu Martins Marba
{"title":"Cerebral blood flow assessment of preterm infants during respiratory therapy with the expiratory flow increase technique","authors":"Mariana Almada Bassani ,&nbsp;Jamil Pedro Siqueira Caldas ,&nbsp;Abimael Aranha Netto ,&nbsp;Sérgio Tadeu Martins Marba","doi":"10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the impact of respiratory therapy with the expiratory flow increase technique on cerebral hemodynamics of premature newborns.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is an intervention study, which included 40 preterm infants (≤34 weeks) aged 8–15 days of life, clinically stable in ambient air or oxygen catheter use. Children with heart defects, diagnosis of brain lesion and/or those using vasoactive drugs were excluded. Ultrasonographic assessments with transcranial Doppler flowmetry were performed before, during and after the increase in expiratory flow session, which lasted 5min. Cerebral blood flow velocity and resistance and pulsatility indices in the pericallosal artery were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respiratory physical therapy did not significantly alter flow velocity at the systolic peak (<em>p</em>=0.50), the end diastolic flow velocity (<em>p</em>=0.17), the mean flow velocity (<em>p</em>=0.07), the resistance index (<em>p</em>=0.41) and the pulsatility index (<em>p</em>=0.67) over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The expiratory flow increase technique did not affect cerebral blood flow in clinically-stable preterm infants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101120,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 178-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.007","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2359348216000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of respiratory therapy with the expiratory flow increase technique on cerebral hemodynamics of premature newborns.

Methods

This is an intervention study, which included 40 preterm infants (≤34 weeks) aged 8–15 days of life, clinically stable in ambient air or oxygen catheter use. Children with heart defects, diagnosis of brain lesion and/or those using vasoactive drugs were excluded. Ultrasonographic assessments with transcranial Doppler flowmetry were performed before, during and after the increase in expiratory flow session, which lasted 5min. Cerebral blood flow velocity and resistance and pulsatility indices in the pericallosal artery were assessed.

Results

Respiratory physical therapy did not significantly alter flow velocity at the systolic peak (p=0.50), the end diastolic flow velocity (p=0.17), the mean flow velocity (p=0.07), the resistance index (p=0.41) and the pulsatility index (p=0.67) over time.

Conclusions

The expiratory flow increase technique did not affect cerebral blood flow in clinically-stable preterm infants.

呼气流量增加技术对早产儿呼吸治疗期间脑血流量的评估
目的探讨呼气流量增加技术呼吸治疗对早产儿脑血流动力学的影响。方法本研究是一项干预研究,纳入40例8-15天的早产儿(≤34周),在环境空气或氧导管使用下临床稳定。排除有心脏缺陷、诊断为脑损伤和/或使用血管活性药物的儿童。经颅多普勒血流仪在呼气流量增加之前、期间和之后进行超声评估,持续5min。观察胼胝体周围动脉血流速度、阻力及脉搏指数。结果呼吸物理治疗对心脏收缩期峰值血流速度(p=0.50)、舒张末期血流速度(p=0.17)、平均血流速度(p=0.07)、阻力指数(p=0.41)和脉搏指数(p=0.67)随时间的变化无显著影响。结论呼气流量增加术对临床稳定的早产儿脑血流量无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信