New insights and updated guidelines for epigenome-wide association studies

Lisa H. Chadwick , Akira Sawa , Ivana V. Yang , Andrea Baccarelli , Xandra O. Breakefield , Hong-Wen Deng , Dana C. Dolinoy , M. Daniele Fallin , Nina T. Holland , E. Andres Houseman , Stavros Lomvardas , Mahendra Rao , John S. Satterlee , Frederick L. Tyson , Pandurangan Vijayanand , John M. Greally
{"title":"New insights and updated guidelines for epigenome-wide association studies","authors":"Lisa H. Chadwick ,&nbsp;Akira Sawa ,&nbsp;Ivana V. Yang ,&nbsp;Andrea Baccarelli ,&nbsp;Xandra O. Breakefield ,&nbsp;Hong-Wen Deng ,&nbsp;Dana C. Dolinoy ,&nbsp;M. Daniele Fallin ,&nbsp;Nina T. Holland ,&nbsp;E. Andres Houseman ,&nbsp;Stavros Lomvardas ,&nbsp;Mahendra Rao ,&nbsp;John S. Satterlee ,&nbsp;Frederick L. Tyson ,&nbsp;Pandurangan Vijayanand ,&nbsp;John M. Greally","doi":"10.1016/j.nepig.2014.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Epigenetic dysregulation in disease is increasingly studied as a potential mediator of pathophysiology. The epigenetic events are believed to occur in somatic cells, but the limited changes of DNA methylation in studies to date indicate that only subsets of the cells tested undergo epigenetic dysregulation. The recognition of this subpopulation effect indicates the need for care in design and execution of epigenome-wide association studies (EWASs), paying particular attention to confounding sources of variability. To maximize the sensitivity of the EWASs, ideally, the cell type mediating the disease should be tested, which is not always practical or ethical in human subjects. The value of using accessible cells as surrogates for the target, disease-mediating cell type has not been rigorously tested to date. In this review, participants in a workshop convened by the National Institutes of Health update EWAS design and execution guidelines to reflect new insights in the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90931,"journal":{"name":"Neuroepigenetics","volume":"1 ","pages":"Pages 14-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nepig.2014.10.004","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroepigenetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221478451400005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Epigenetic dysregulation in disease is increasingly studied as a potential mediator of pathophysiology. The epigenetic events are believed to occur in somatic cells, but the limited changes of DNA methylation in studies to date indicate that only subsets of the cells tested undergo epigenetic dysregulation. The recognition of this subpopulation effect indicates the need for care in design and execution of epigenome-wide association studies (EWASs), paying particular attention to confounding sources of variability. To maximize the sensitivity of the EWASs, ideally, the cell type mediating the disease should be tested, which is not always practical or ethical in human subjects. The value of using accessible cells as surrogates for the target, disease-mediating cell type has not been rigorously tested to date. In this review, participants in a workshop convened by the National Institutes of Health update EWAS design and execution guidelines to reflect new insights in the field.

全表观基因组关联研究的新见解和更新指南
疾病中的表观遗传失调作为一种潜在的病理生理介质被越来越多地研究。表观遗传事件被认为发生在体细胞中,但迄今为止研究中DNA甲基化的有限变化表明,只有接受测试的细胞亚群发生表观遗传失调。认识到这种亚群效应表明,在设计和执行全表观基因组关联研究(EWASs)时需要谨慎,特别注意变异的混杂来源。为了最大限度地提高EWASs的灵敏度,理想情况下,应该测试介导疾病的细胞类型,这在人类受试者中并不总是实用或道德的。迄今为止,使用可接近的细胞作为目标、疾病介导细胞类型的替代品的价值尚未得到严格的测试。在这篇综述中,由美国国立卫生研究院召集的研讨会的参与者更新了EWAS的设计和执行指南,以反映该领域的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信