Alternative methods and strategies to reduce, refine, and replace animal use for human vaccine post-licensing safety testing: state of the science and future directions

Richard Isbrucker , Robin Levis , Warren Casey , Richard McFarland , Michael Schmitt , Juan Arciniega , Johan Descamps , Theresa Finn , Coenraad Hendriksen , Yoshinobu Horiuchi , James Keller , Hajime Kojima , Dorothea Sesardic , Paul Stickings , Nelson W Johnson , David Allen
{"title":"Alternative methods and strategies to reduce, refine, and replace animal use for human vaccine post-licensing safety testing: state of the science and future directions","authors":"Richard Isbrucker ,&nbsp;Robin Levis ,&nbsp;Warren Casey ,&nbsp;Richard McFarland ,&nbsp;Michael Schmitt ,&nbsp;Juan Arciniega ,&nbsp;Johan Descamps ,&nbsp;Theresa Finn ,&nbsp;Coenraad Hendriksen ,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Horiuchi ,&nbsp;James Keller ,&nbsp;Hajime Kojima ,&nbsp;Dorothea Sesardic ,&nbsp;Paul Stickings ,&nbsp;Nelson W Johnson ,&nbsp;David Allen","doi":"10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use (the 3Rs). Six topics were addressed in detail by speakers and workshop participants and are reported in a series of reports. This workshop report, the fifth in the series, addresses methods and strategies for human vaccine post-licensing safety testing that can reduce, refine, and replace animal use. It also provides recommendations for priority research and other activities necessary to advance the development and/or implementation of 3Rs methods for human vaccine post-licensing safety testing. Workshop participants agreed that future 3Rs activities should give highest priority to vaccine safety tests that (1) use the most animals per test and for which many vaccine lots are tested annually, (2) produce high variability and/or require frequent repeat tests, (3) are associated with severe animal pain and distress, and/or (4) involve nonhuman primates. Based on these criteria, safety tests for diphtheria, pertussis, oral polio, and tetanus vaccines were identified as the highest priorities. Recommended priority research, development, and validation activities included (1) expanding use of the transgenic mouse model for oral polio vaccine, and (2) developing alternatives to the monkey neurovirulence test for preclinical safety and lot release neurovirulence testing of mumps vaccines. Implementation of the workshop recommendations is expected to advance alternative <em>in vitro</em> methods for human vaccine post-licensing safety testing that will benefit animal welfare while ensuring continued production of safe human vaccines and protection of human and animal health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89221,"journal":{"name":"Procedia in vaccinology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 47-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.004","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia in vaccinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877282X11000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use (the 3Rs). Six topics were addressed in detail by speakers and workshop participants and are reported in a series of reports. This workshop report, the fifth in the series, addresses methods and strategies for human vaccine post-licensing safety testing that can reduce, refine, and replace animal use. It also provides recommendations for priority research and other activities necessary to advance the development and/or implementation of 3Rs methods for human vaccine post-licensing safety testing. Workshop participants agreed that future 3Rs activities should give highest priority to vaccine safety tests that (1) use the most animals per test and for which many vaccine lots are tested annually, (2) produce high variability and/or require frequent repeat tests, (3) are associated with severe animal pain and distress, and/or (4) involve nonhuman primates. Based on these criteria, safety tests for diphtheria, pertussis, oral polio, and tetanus vaccines were identified as the highest priorities. Recommended priority research, development, and validation activities included (1) expanding use of the transgenic mouse model for oral polio vaccine, and (2) developing alternatives to the monkey neurovirulence test for preclinical safety and lot release neurovirulence testing of mumps vaccines. Implementation of the workshop recommendations is expected to advance alternative in vitro methods for human vaccine post-licensing safety testing that will benefit animal welfare while ensuring continued production of safe human vaccines and protection of human and animal health.

减少、改进和替代用于人疫苗许可后安全测试的动物使用的替代方法和战略:科学现状和未来方向
NICEATM和ICCVAM召开了一次国际讲习班,审查人用和兽用疫苗效力和安全性测试方法的科学现状,并确定推进可进一步减少、改进和取代动物使用(3r)的新方法和改进方法的机会。发言者和讲习班与会者详细讨论了六个专题,并在一系列报告中作了报告。本研讨会报告是该系列的第五份报告,讨论了可减少、改进和取代动物使用的人用疫苗许可后安全测试的方法和战略。它还就优先研究和其他必要活动提出建议,以促进开发和/或实施用于人疫苗许可后安全检测的3Rs方法。讲习班与会者一致认为,未来的3Rs活动应优先考虑以下疫苗安全性试验:(1)每次试验使用最多的动物,每年对许多疫苗批次进行试验,(2)产生高度可变性和/或需要频繁重复试验,(3)与严重的动物疼痛和痛苦有关,和/或(4)涉及非人灵长类动物。根据这些标准,白喉、百日咳、口服脊髓灰质炎和破伤风疫苗的安全性测试被确定为最优先事项。推荐的优先研究、开发和验证活动包括:(1)扩大口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗转基因小鼠模型的使用,(2)开发用于腮腺炎疫苗临床前安全性和批释放神经毒力测试的猴子神经毒力测试的替代方法。执行讲习班的建议预计将促进人疫苗许可后安全测试的替代体外方法,这将有利于动物福利,同时确保继续生产安全的人用疫苗并保护人类和动物健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信