Evaluation of Duloxetine Effectiveness in the Management of DPNP with Respect to Baseline Characteristics

Y. Pritchett, J. Xu, B. Rotz, A. Chappell, J. Wernicke
{"title":"Evaluation of Duloxetine Effectiveness in the Management of DPNP with Respect to Baseline Characteristics","authors":"Y. Pritchett,&nbsp;J. Xu,&nbsp;B. Rotz,&nbsp;A. Chappell,&nbsp;J. Wernicke","doi":"10.1016/j.nurx.2006.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine impact of age, gender, origin, duration of diabetic neuropathy, type of diabetes, and pain severity on treatment outcome of duloxetine (DLX) in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from 3 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (1-3) were pooled. In Study 1, 457 patients with DPNP were randomly assigned to DLX 20 mg QD, 60 mg QD, 60 mg BID, or placebo. In Studies 2 and 3, 334 and 348 patients, respectively, were randomly assigned to DLX 60 mg QD, 60 mg BID, or placebo. DLX 20 mg QD was not included in the analyses due to its ineffectiveness found in Study 1. Primary efficacy measure was the weekly mean score of 24-Hour Average Pain Severity collected by patient’s diary on 11-point Likert scale. Subgroup impact was evaluated for combined DLX doses with references to placebo group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DLX 60 mg QD and 60 mg BID significantly improved weekly mean scores of 24-Hour Average Pain Severity in each study (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). There were no statistical significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.1) interactions of treatment with age (&lt;65 or ≥65), gender (male or female), origin (Caucasian or other), duration of diabetic neuropathy (&lt;2, 2–&lt;6, or ≥6 years), type of diabetes (Type I or Type II) with an exception for pain severity (BPI average pain &lt;6 or ≥6). DLX effect was observed for both severe and less severe groups with more separation on the severe group. The superiority of DLX over placebo was observed within almost each of the stratum with the exception of Type I patient group, which demonstrated the advantage of DLX treatment with <em>p</em> = 0.123. The magnitude of change was slightly higher in Type II patients than in those with Type I; however, Type I group sample size was much smaller which may account for the statistical insignificance. DLX was safe and well tolerated with less than 20% discontinuation due to AEs, while showing no interference with diabetic control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These studies suggested that DLX was effective and safe in the treatment of DPNP, and its effectiveness was invariant with respect to baseline conditions.</p><p>Funding provided by Eli Lilly and Company.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87195,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics","volume":"3 3","pages":"Page 407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nurx.2006.05.010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1545534306000800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine impact of age, gender, origin, duration of diabetic neuropathy, type of diabetes, and pain severity on treatment outcome of duloxetine (DLX) in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).

Methods

Data from 3 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (1-3) were pooled. In Study 1, 457 patients with DPNP were randomly assigned to DLX 20 mg QD, 60 mg QD, 60 mg BID, or placebo. In Studies 2 and 3, 334 and 348 patients, respectively, were randomly assigned to DLX 60 mg QD, 60 mg BID, or placebo. DLX 20 mg QD was not included in the analyses due to its ineffectiveness found in Study 1. Primary efficacy measure was the weekly mean score of 24-Hour Average Pain Severity collected by patient’s diary on 11-point Likert scale. Subgroup impact was evaluated for combined DLX doses with references to placebo group.

Results

DLX 60 mg QD and 60 mg BID significantly improved weekly mean scores of 24-Hour Average Pain Severity in each study (p < 0.001). There were no statistical significant (p < 0.1) interactions of treatment with age (<65 or ≥65), gender (male or female), origin (Caucasian or other), duration of diabetic neuropathy (<2, 2–<6, or ≥6 years), type of diabetes (Type I or Type II) with an exception for pain severity (BPI average pain <6 or ≥6). DLX effect was observed for both severe and less severe groups with more separation on the severe group. The superiority of DLX over placebo was observed within almost each of the stratum with the exception of Type I patient group, which demonstrated the advantage of DLX treatment with p = 0.123. The magnitude of change was slightly higher in Type II patients than in those with Type I; however, Type I group sample size was much smaller which may account for the statistical insignificance. DLX was safe and well tolerated with less than 20% discontinuation due to AEs, while showing no interference with diabetic control.

Conclusion

These studies suggested that DLX was effective and safe in the treatment of DPNP, and its effectiveness was invariant with respect to baseline conditions.

Funding provided by Eli Lilly and Company.

根据基线特征评价度洛西汀治疗DPNP的有效性
目的探讨年龄、性别、发病原因、糖尿病病程、糖尿病类型和疼痛严重程度对度洛西汀(DLX)治疗糖尿病周围神经性疼痛(DPNP)疗效的影响。方法汇总3项12周、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(1-3)的数据。在研究1中,457名DPNP患者被随机分配到DLX 20 mg QD, 60 mg QD, 60 mg BID或安慰剂组。在研究2和研究3中,分别有334和348名患者被随机分配到DLX 60mg QD, 60mg BID或安慰剂组。由于在研究1中发现DLX 20 mg QD无效,因此未纳入分析。主要疗效指标为患者日记收集的24小时平均疼痛严重程度的每周平均评分(11分李克特量表)。以安慰剂组为参照,评估联合DLX剂量的亚组影响。结果dlx 60mg QD和60mg BID可显著改善各组患者24小时平均疼痛严重程度的周平均评分(p <0.001)。差异无统计学意义(p <0.1)治疗与年龄(65岁或≥65岁)、性别(男性或女性)、来源(高加索或其他)、糖尿病神经病变持续时间(2岁、2 - 6岁或≥6岁)、糖尿病类型(I型或II型)的相互作用,但疼痛严重程度(BPI平均疼痛6岁或≥6岁)除外。重度组和轻重度组均观察到DLX效应,重度组分离程度更高。除I型患者组外,DLX在几乎所有阶层均优于安慰剂,这表明DLX治疗的优势(p = 0.123)。II型患者的变化幅度略高于I型患者;然而,I型组的样本量要小得多,这可能是统计上不显著的原因。DLX安全且耐受性良好,因不良反应而停药的比例低于20%,同时对糖尿病控制没有干扰。结论DLX治疗DPNP是有效且安全的,其有效性相对于基线条件是不变的。资金由礼来公司提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信