Analisi dello spazio in ortognatodonzia: evoluzione di pensiero con l’evoluzione delle tecniche

A. Silvestri , D. Tarasco , V. Mazzoli
{"title":"Analisi dello spazio in ortognatodonzia: evoluzione di pensiero con l’evoluzione delle tecniche","authors":"A. Silvestri ,&nbsp;D. Tarasco ,&nbsp;V. Mazzoli","doi":"10.1016/j.mor.2011.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of our work was to evaluate changes in the concept of space over the years and to explore how techniques for resolving dentobasal discrepancies have evolved. The results of this assessment should allow us to choose the most appropriate operative approach and estimate the possibilities and limits of arch expansion, as well as the indications and contraindications for extraction, always considering the concept of the guide arch.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Proper treatment planning requires space analysis of the arches to resolve any dentobasal discrepancies. We conducted a review of the literature to identify the best methods for conducting a space analysis and the indications for extraction and expansion used by different authors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The review showed that modern orthodontic techniques can markedly reduce the need for extraction and achieve substantial expansion of the arches, including the lower arch, which has long been considered off-limits because of the high relapse rate associated with its expansion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although the new self-ligating appliances have revolutionized thinking in orthodontics, extreme caution should be used in treatment planning. In fact, more data are needed on the neoformation of bone induced by the interaction between brackets and light forces and on the stability of treatments performed with expansion that has until recently been considered excessive. Therefore, one of the most frequent orthodontic problems, dental crowding, is still being approached with solutions that are often antithetical.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76176,"journal":{"name":"Mondo ortodontico","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 108-110, 112-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mor.2011.04.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mondo ortodontico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0391200011000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of our work was to evaluate changes in the concept of space over the years and to explore how techniques for resolving dentobasal discrepancies have evolved. The results of this assessment should allow us to choose the most appropriate operative approach and estimate the possibilities and limits of arch expansion, as well as the indications and contraindications for extraction, always considering the concept of the guide arch.

Materials and methods

Proper treatment planning requires space analysis of the arches to resolve any dentobasal discrepancies. We conducted a review of the literature to identify the best methods for conducting a space analysis and the indications for extraction and expansion used by different authors.

Results

The review showed that modern orthodontic techniques can markedly reduce the need for extraction and achieve substantial expansion of the arches, including the lower arch, which has long been considered off-limits because of the high relapse rate associated with its expansion.

Conclusions

Although the new self-ligating appliances have revolutionized thinking in orthodontics, extreme caution should be used in treatment planning. In fact, more data are needed on the neoformation of bone induced by the interaction between brackets and light forces and on the stability of treatments performed with expansion that has until recently been considered excessive. Therefore, one of the most frequent orthodontic problems, dental crowding, is still being approached with solutions that are often antithetical.

正交空间分析:随着技术的发展,思想的发展
我们的研究目的是评估多年来空间概念的变化,并探讨解决牙基差异的技术是如何发展的。评估的结果应使我们能够选择最合适的手术入路,评估弓扩张的可能性和局限性,以及拔牙的适应症和禁忌症,同时始终考虑引导弓的概念。材料和方法适当的治疗计划需要对牙弓进行空间分析,以解决任何牙基差异。我们对文献进行了回顾,以确定进行空间分析的最佳方法以及不同作者使用的提取和扩展适应症。结果现代正畸技术可以显著减少拔牙的需要,并实现足弓的大量扩展,包括下足弓,长期以来由于其扩展相关的高复发率而被认为是禁忌。结论新型自结扎矫治器虽然革新了正畸学的思路,但在制定治疗计划时仍应格外谨慎。事实上,还需要更多的数据来研究托槽与外力之间的相互作用所引起的骨新形成,以及直到最近才被认为过度的扩展治疗的稳定性。因此,最常见的正畸问题之一,牙齿拥挤,仍然是接近的解决方案,往往是对立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信