Estrazioni senza consenso informato

F. Montagna, L. Montagna, S.P. Orzella, A. Piras
{"title":"Estrazioni senza consenso informato","authors":"F. Montagna,&nbsp;L. Montagna,&nbsp;S.P. Orzella,&nbsp;A. Piras","doi":"10.1016/j.mor.2009.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To report two cases of litigation following an orthodontic treatment of teeth extraction.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Two cases are reported and analyzed together because they were caused by the same reason, that is the absence of informed consent. The authors describe the medico-legal consequences.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>Even if the treatment plan was correct and teeth extractions were indicated, this does not represent a valid reason in terms of professional liability, since the extractions were illegal due to the absence of informed consent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76176,"journal":{"name":"Mondo ortodontico","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 215-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mor.2009.11.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mondo ortodontico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0391200009000429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To report two cases of litigation following an orthodontic treatment of teeth extraction.

Material and methods

Two cases are reported and analyzed together because they were caused by the same reason, that is the absence of informed consent. The authors describe the medico-legal consequences.

Results and conclusions

Even if the treatment plan was correct and teeth extractions were indicated, this does not represent a valid reason in terms of professional liability, since the extractions were illegal due to the absence of informed consent.

未经知情同意的开采
目的报告2例拔牙正畸治疗后的诉讼。材料与方法我们将两个病例一起进行报告和分析,因为它们是由相同的原因引起的,即缺乏知情同意。提交人描述了医疗法律后果。结果与结论即使治疗方案正确,并且有拔牙的指示,也不构成专业责任方面的正当理由,因为拔牙是在没有知情同意的情况下非法的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信