THE EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES AND THE NOTION OF AN EARLY STAGE IN THE CASE OF BREWER CARÍAS. IS THE INTER-AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM AT RISK?

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Angel Gabriel Cabrera Silva
{"title":"THE EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES AND THE NOTION OF AN EARLY STAGE IN THE CASE OF BREWER CARÍAS. IS THE INTER-AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM AT RISK?","authors":"Angel Gabriel Cabrera Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This note analyzes the judgment delivered by the Inter-American Court on Human Rights in the Case of Brewer Carías v. Venezuela. It argues that the criteria that allowed the preliminary objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies contravenes the precedents of the Inter-American line of case law. By examining the origin and implications of the newly-introduced concept of an “early stage” in domestic proceedings, this paper then reaches to the conclusion that it could endanger the accessibility and impact of the Inter-American Human Rights System.</p></div><div><p>Esta nota analiza la sentencia dictada por la Corte Intermericana de Derechos Humanos en el Caso Brewer Carías vs. Venezuela. Se sostiene que los criterios utilizados para admitir la excepción preliminar de falta de agotamiento de recursos internos, contraviene los precedentes establecidos en la línea jurisprudencial del Sistema Interamericano. Mediante un estudio del origen e implicaciones del recién introducido concepto de una “etapa temprana” en los recursos internos, se concluye que esta noción podría implicar un riesgo para la accesibilidad y el impacto del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41684,"journal":{"name":"Mexican Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.07.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mexican Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1870057816300373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This note analyzes the judgment delivered by the Inter-American Court on Human Rights in the Case of Brewer Carías v. Venezuela. It argues that the criteria that allowed the preliminary objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies contravenes the precedents of the Inter-American line of case law. By examining the origin and implications of the newly-introduced concept of an “early stage” in domestic proceedings, this paper then reaches to the conclusion that it could endanger the accessibility and impact of the Inter-American Human Rights System.

Esta nota analiza la sentencia dictada por la Corte Intermericana de Derechos Humanos en el Caso Brewer Carías vs. Venezuela. Se sostiene que los criterios utilizados para admitir la excepción preliminar de falta de agotamiento de recursos internos, contraviene los precedentes establecidos en la línea jurisprudencial del Sistema Interamericano. Mediante un estudio del origen e implicaciones del recién introducido concepto de una “etapa temprana” en los recursos internos, se concluye que esta noción podría implicar un riesgo para la accesibilidad y el impacto del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.

用尽国内补救措施和概念的早期阶段的情况下,啤酒carÍas。美洲间的人权体系是否处于危险之中?
本说明分析了美洲人权法院在Brewer carias诉委内瑞拉一案中作出的判决。它认为,允许初步反对不用尽国内补救办法的标准违反了美洲判例法的先例。通过审查国内程序中新引入的“早期阶段”概念的起源和影响,本文得出的结论是,它可能危及美洲人权制度的可及性和影响。本文分析了美洲人权法院在Brewer carias诉委内瑞拉一案中的判决。在这方面,应当指出的是,《美洲人权公约》第5条规定,在不用尽国内补救办法的情况下接受初步反对意见的标准违反了美洲体系法理学所确立的先例。本研究的目的是分析美洲人权制度的可及性和影响,并探讨在美洲人权制度中引入“早期阶段”概念的原因和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信