Clinical assessment of insulin action during late pregnancy in women at risk for gestational diabetes: Association of maternal glycemia with perinatal outcome

Karen E. Elkind-Hirsch , Beverly W. Ogden , Carmen J. Darensbourg , Brett L. Schelin
{"title":"Clinical assessment of insulin action during late pregnancy in women at risk for gestational diabetes: Association of maternal glycemia with perinatal outcome","authors":"Karen E. Elkind-Hirsch ,&nbsp;Beverly W. Ogden ,&nbsp;Carmen J. Darensbourg ,&nbsp;Brett L. Schelin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdm.2009.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We prospectively evaluated differences in fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived indices of insulin action in Caucasian (Cau) and African-American (AA) pregnant women and compared them with obstetric outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>IRB-approved prospective study in 171 pregnant women undergoing a 3-h OGTT. Mathematical modeling was used to evaluate insulin response, insulin activity and glucose tolerance in fasting and postglucose ingestion state. Insulin sensitivity indices derived from fasting (HOMA-IR) and glucose-stimulated values (SIOGTT) were compared. An insulin sensitivity-secretion index (IS-SI) was calculated from the product of the SIOGTT and early-phase insulin secretion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-nine patients had gestational diabetes (GDM), 28 had gestational impaired glucose tolerance (GIGT) and 94 had normal glucose tolerance after an abnormal glucose challenge test (NGT-abnGCT). Insulin sensitivity was lowest in women with GDM. In all groups, pregnant AA women were significantly more insulin resistant than Cau women, based on both HOMA-IR and SIOGTT, but had enhanced insulin secretion compared to their Cau counterparts. The mean IS-SI progressively improved for all women from GDM to GIGT to NGT-abnGCT. Women with NGT-abnGCT had a higher prevalence of large-for-gestational age (LGA) newborns and significantly higher cesarean section rate.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Insulin measures along with glucose determinations during OGTT testing in pregnant women at risk for diabetes provide valuable information that varies according to race. We observed that pregnant women with a lesser degree of glucose tolerance abnormality during pregnancy who receive no intervention have a higher risk for LGA infants and significantly increased C-section rate (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT006874791).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89155,"journal":{"name":"International journal of diabetes mellitus","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijdm.2009.12.006","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of diabetes mellitus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877593409000630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

We prospectively evaluated differences in fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived indices of insulin action in Caucasian (Cau) and African-American (AA) pregnant women and compared them with obstetric outcomes.

Study design

IRB-approved prospective study in 171 pregnant women undergoing a 3-h OGTT. Mathematical modeling was used to evaluate insulin response, insulin activity and glucose tolerance in fasting and postglucose ingestion state. Insulin sensitivity indices derived from fasting (HOMA-IR) and glucose-stimulated values (SIOGTT) were compared. An insulin sensitivity-secretion index (IS-SI) was calculated from the product of the SIOGTT and early-phase insulin secretion.

Results

Forty-nine patients had gestational diabetes (GDM), 28 had gestational impaired glucose tolerance (GIGT) and 94 had normal glucose tolerance after an abnormal glucose challenge test (NGT-abnGCT). Insulin sensitivity was lowest in women with GDM. In all groups, pregnant AA women were significantly more insulin resistant than Cau women, based on both HOMA-IR and SIOGTT, but had enhanced insulin secretion compared to their Cau counterparts. The mean IS-SI progressively improved for all women from GDM to GIGT to NGT-abnGCT. Women with NGT-abnGCT had a higher prevalence of large-for-gestational age (LGA) newborns and significantly higher cesarean section rate.

Discussion

Insulin measures along with glucose determinations during OGTT testing in pregnant women at risk for diabetes provide valuable information that varies according to race. We observed that pregnant women with a lesser degree of glucose tolerance abnormality during pregnancy who receive no intervention have a higher risk for LGA infants and significantly increased C-section rate (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT006874791).

妊娠晚期有妊娠糖尿病风险的妇女胰岛素作用的临床评估:母体血糖与围产期结局的关系
目的:前瞻性评估白种人(Cau)和非裔美国人(AA)孕妇空腹和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)衍生的胰岛素作用指标的差异,并将其与产科结局进行比较。研究设计:经irb批准的前瞻性研究纳入171名接受3小时OGTT治疗的孕妇。采用数学模型评价空腹和糖后摄取状态下胰岛素反应、胰岛素活性和葡萄糖耐量。比较空腹胰岛素敏感性指数(HOMA-IR)和葡萄糖刺激值(SIOGTT)。根据SIOGTT与早期胰岛素分泌的乘积计算胰岛素敏感性分泌指数(IS-SI)。结果49例妊娠期糖尿病(GDM), 28例妊娠期糖耐量受损(GIGT), 94例异常糖激发试验(NGT-abnGCT)后糖耐量正常。糖尿病女性的胰岛素敏感性最低。根据HOMA-IR和SIOGTT,在所有组中,AA孕妇的胰岛素抵抗明显高于Cau孕妇,但与Cau孕妇相比,AA孕妇的胰岛素分泌增加。从GDM到GIGT再到NGT-abnGCT,所有女性的平均IS-SI逐渐改善。患有NGT-abnGCT的妇女大胎龄新生儿(LGA)患病率较高,剖宫产率明显较高。在OGTT测试中,有糖尿病风险的孕妇的胰岛素测量和葡萄糖测定提供了有价值的信息,这些信息因种族而异。我们观察到,妊娠期间糖耐量异常程度较轻且未接受干预的孕妇患LGA婴儿的风险较高,剖腹产率显著增加(ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT006874791)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书