Sociedad civil, emancipación y crisis

Lucas A. Gascón Pérez
{"title":"Sociedad civil, emancipación y crisis","authors":"Lucas A. Gascón Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.espol.2016.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present paper addresses the issue of <em>civil society</em> “irreducibility” to <em>nihilism</em>. This purpose, that it is also possible to find in Habermas’, Cohen's and Arato's particular version of post-Marxism, includes here an additional challenge: to incorporate a radical consciousness of this category potentialities to exclude and depoliticize and, yet, to maintain its emancipatory imprint. In the central section, the author exposes this post-Marxist perspective and the questioning of Hegelian-Marxist tradition. Finally, concludes by reviewing Alexander's and Koselleck's approaches, which contribute to think about irreducibility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100493,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Políticos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.espol.2016.10.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Políticos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185161616300154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper addresses the issue of civil society “irreducibility” to nihilism. This purpose, that it is also possible to find in Habermas’, Cohen's and Arato's particular version of post-Marxism, includes here an additional challenge: to incorporate a radical consciousness of this category potentialities to exclude and depoliticize and, yet, to maintain its emancipatory imprint. In the central section, the author exposes this post-Marxist perspective and the questioning of Hegelian-Marxist tradition. Finally, concludes by reviewing Alexander's and Koselleck's approaches, which contribute to think about irreducibility.

社会文明,emancipación危机
本文探讨了公民社会对虚无主义的“不可约性”问题。这个目的,在哈贝马斯、科恩和阿拉托的特殊版本的后马克思主义中也可以找到,在这里包含了一个额外的挑战:将这一类别的激进意识纳入排除和非政治化的潜力,同时保持其解放的印记。在中心部分,作者揭示了这种后马克思主义视角和对黑格尔马克思主义传统的质疑。最后,通过回顾亚历山大和科塞莱克的方法来总结,这有助于思考不可约性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信