Comparative Effectiveness of On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Manasi Datar MS , Yi Yang MD, PhD , Rohan Mahabaleshwarkar MS , John P. Bentley PhD , Benjamin F. Banahan III PhD
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis","authors":"Manasi Datar MS ,&nbsp;Yi Yang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rohan Mahabaleshwarkar MS ,&nbsp;John P. Bentley PhD ,&nbsp;Benjamin F. Banahan III PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2012.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Coronary artery bypass grafting<span> (CABG) is a procedure used to restore blood flow to the heart for patients with coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of on-pump versus off-pump CABG in elderly patients using the 2006–2008 5% national sample of Medicare administrative claims.</span></p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p><span>A retrospective matched cohort study design was used. Elderly patients (over 65 years of age) undergoing CABG between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2008 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9</span><sup>th</sup><span><span><span> Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Propensity scores were used to match patients undergoing on-pump versus off-pump CABG in a ratio of 1:1. Outcomes assessed in this study include a composite cardiovascular end point consisting of postoperative acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or </span>revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG) and all-cause mortality. </span>Descriptive statistics<span> were reported along with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Postoperative risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in these groups was compared using Cox proportional hazards models.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The matched sample consisted of 5356 patients (2678 patients in each group). The risk of composite outcome in the 2 groups was not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR] 0.915; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.316). The risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower among on-pump CABG patients compared with off-pump CABG patients (HR 0.544; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that elderly patients undergoing on-pump CABG have a lower risk of mortality as compared with those receiving off-pump CABG. Caution should be exercised when recommending elderly patients for off-pump CABG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages e221-e230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2012.09.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131912000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a procedure used to restore blood flow to the heart for patients with coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of on-pump versus off-pump CABG in elderly patients using the 2006–2008 5% national sample of Medicare administrative claims.

Study Design

A retrospective matched cohort study design was used. Elderly patients (over 65 years of age) undergoing CABG between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2008 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Propensity scores were used to match patients undergoing on-pump versus off-pump CABG in a ratio of 1:1. Outcomes assessed in this study include a composite cardiovascular end point consisting of postoperative acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG) and all-cause mortality. Descriptive statistics were reported along with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Postoperative risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in these groups was compared using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

The matched sample consisted of 5356 patients (2678 patients in each group). The risk of composite outcome in the 2 groups was not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR] 0.915; P = 0.316). The risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower among on-pump CABG patients compared with off-pump CABG patients (HR 0.544; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

This study shows that elderly patients undergoing on-pump CABG have a lower risk of mortality as compared with those receiving off-pump CABG. Caution should be exercised when recommending elderly patients for off-pump CABG.

老年患者开泵与不开泵冠状动脉旁路移植术的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析
目的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是一种用于恢复冠状动脉疾病患者心脏血流的手术。本研究的目的是利用2006-2008年5%的全国医疗保险行政索赔样本,比较老年患者使用泵送与非泵送CABG的有效性。研究设计采用回顾性匹配队列研究设计。2006年7月1日至2008年6月30日期间接受CABG的老年患者(65岁以上)使用《国际疾病分类》第九版临床修改代码进行鉴定。倾向评分用于匹配接受有泵和无泵CABG的患者,比例为1:1。本研究评估的结果包括一个复合心血管终点,包括术后急性心肌梗死、中风或血运重建术(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或CABG)和全因死亡率。描述性统计与Kaplan-Meier估计一起报告。使用Cox比例风险模型比较两组患者的术后不良心血管结局风险和全因死亡率。结果匹配样本5356例(每组2678例)。两组患者发生综合结局的风险无显著差异(风险比[HR] 0.915;p = 0.316)。与非体外循环CABG患者相比,非体外循环CABG患者全因死亡风险显著降低(HR 0.544;P & lt;0.0001)。结论:与非体外循环CABG相比,接受非体外循环CABG的老年患者死亡风险较低。建议老年患者行非体外循环冠脉搭桥时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信