Mary L. Davis-Ajami PhD , Milap C. Nahata PharmD , Gregory Reardon RPh, PhD , Eric E. Seiber PhD , Rajesh Balkrishnan PhD
{"title":"Associations between Joblessness and Oral Anti-diabetic Medication Adherence in US Diabetic Working-age Adults","authors":"Mary L. Davis-Ajami PhD , Milap C. Nahata PharmD , Gregory Reardon RPh, PhD , Eric E. Seiber PhD , Rajesh Balkrishnan PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2012.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess potential associations between joblessness and oral anti-diabetic (OAD) medication adherence in US diabetic working-age adults.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p><span>A retrospective longitudinal panel design used pooled 2001-2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data forming a nationally representative sample of diabetic individuals, ages 24-59 years. Pregnancy, seasonal job status, retired persons, a student designation, and those prescribed insulin were excluded. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC). A PDC ≥0.80 was classified as adherent. Descriptive statistics and multivariate </span>regression analysis accounting for the MEPS' complex survey design were conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>There were 2256 individuals (means: age 48.3 years [SD 8.15], body mass index<span> 31.1 [SD 0.30], Charlson Comorbidity Index 0.37 [SD 0.79]) who met study criteria. Thirty-four percent were jobless at the first interview round and 29% remained jobless all 5 interview rounds during the 2-year panel period. Reasons cited for joblessness included: waiting to start a new job (73%) and unable to work due to illness or disability (20%). Negligible proportions cited staying home to care for family members or </span></span>maternity leave as reasons for joblessness. Proportionately, more individuals were nonadherent (55%, SE 0.006). Joblessness was associated with a 16% significant reduction in the PDC (β −15.9, </span><em>P</em> < 0.001), and a 25% less likelihood of OAD medication adherence compared with those employed (odds ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.90, <em>P</em> = 0.002), while holding all other variables constant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results indicate that jobless working-age individuals with diabetes were significantly less likely to adhere to OAD medication than employed individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages e139-e151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2012.06.001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131912000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Objective
To assess potential associations between joblessness and oral anti-diabetic (OAD) medication adherence in US diabetic working-age adults.
Study Design
A retrospective longitudinal panel design used pooled 2001-2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data forming a nationally representative sample of diabetic individuals, ages 24-59 years. Pregnancy, seasonal job status, retired persons, a student designation, and those prescribed insulin were excluded. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC). A PDC ≥0.80 was classified as adherent. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis accounting for the MEPS' complex survey design were conducted.
Results
There were 2256 individuals (means: age 48.3 years [SD 8.15], body mass index 31.1 [SD 0.30], Charlson Comorbidity Index 0.37 [SD 0.79]) who met study criteria. Thirty-four percent were jobless at the first interview round and 29% remained jobless all 5 interview rounds during the 2-year panel period. Reasons cited for joblessness included: waiting to start a new job (73%) and unable to work due to illness or disability (20%). Negligible proportions cited staying home to care for family members or maternity leave as reasons for joblessness. Proportionately, more individuals were nonadherent (55%, SE 0.006). Joblessness was associated with a 16% significant reduction in the PDC (β −15.9, P < 0.001), and a 25% less likelihood of OAD medication adherence compared with those employed (odds ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.90, P = 0.002), while holding all other variables constant.
Conclusions
The results indicate that jobless working-age individuals with diabetes were significantly less likely to adhere to OAD medication than employed individuals.