Economic evaluation of a small wastewater treatment plant under different design and operation scenarios by life cycle costing

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
David Pryce , Zoran Kapelan , Fayyaz A. Memon
{"title":"Economic evaluation of a small wastewater treatment plant under different design and operation scenarios by life cycle costing","authors":"David Pryce ,&nbsp;Zoran Kapelan ,&nbsp;Fayyaz A. Memon","doi":"10.1016/j.deveng.2022.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-performance wastewater treatment technologies suited to the urban environment remain largely inaccessible to developing countries due to financial constraints. Instead, inadequate technologies are being used that adversely affect the quality of water resources and limit their sustainability. One high performing technology that offers possible solution is a packaged version of the integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) system consisting of a 20 m<sup>3</sup> aerobic reactor and a 4.2 m<sup>3</sup> settlement tank. The present work has investigated aspects of this typically-expensive solution that can be economized to improve its uptake in these countries. To achieve this a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was performed and potential savings identified. The results obtained show that the life cycle cost is $0.31/m<sup>3</sup> and that costs primarily occurred at the construction stage (11.9%) and the operation and maintenance stage (88.1%) with negligible disposal costs. A reduction of up to 42.4% in construction costs were shown to be accessible by adopting other materials such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or to a lesser extent glass-fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). The greatest single cost in the life cycle was found to be incurred by aeration (48.9%), requiring expenditure of $0.15/m<sup>3</sup>, however the use of intermittent aeration (IA) could reduce this further to $0.08/m<sup>3</sup>. Further work is suggested to investigate the broader sustainability of the different aeration strategies in light of these economic results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37901,"journal":{"name":"Development Engineering","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728522000124/pdfft?md5=d447e1ab31f56fc5aaaa10201c36dcda&pid=1-s2.0-S2352728522000124-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728522000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-performance wastewater treatment technologies suited to the urban environment remain largely inaccessible to developing countries due to financial constraints. Instead, inadequate technologies are being used that adversely affect the quality of water resources and limit their sustainability. One high performing technology that offers possible solution is a packaged version of the integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) system consisting of a 20 m3 aerobic reactor and a 4.2 m3 settlement tank. The present work has investigated aspects of this typically-expensive solution that can be economized to improve its uptake in these countries. To achieve this a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was performed and potential savings identified. The results obtained show that the life cycle cost is $0.31/m3 and that costs primarily occurred at the construction stage (11.9%) and the operation and maintenance stage (88.1%) with negligible disposal costs. A reduction of up to 42.4% in construction costs were shown to be accessible by adopting other materials such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or to a lesser extent glass-fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). The greatest single cost in the life cycle was found to be incurred by aeration (48.9%), requiring expenditure of $0.15/m3, however the use of intermittent aeration (IA) could reduce this further to $0.08/m3. Further work is suggested to investigate the broader sustainability of the different aeration strategies in light of these economic results.

基于生命周期成本法的小型污水处理厂不同设计和运行方案的经济评价
由于资金限制,发展中国家在很大程度上仍然无法获得适合城市环境的高性能废水处理技术。相反,目前使用的技术不足,对水资源的质量产生不利影响,并限制其可持续性。一种高性能技术提供了可能的解决方案,即集成固定膜活性污泥(IFAS)系统的包装版本,该系统由一个20立方米的好氧反应器和一个4.2立方米的沉降池组成。目前的工作已经调查了这种典型的昂贵解决方案的各个方面,这些方面可以节省下来,以提高这些国家对其的吸收。为了实现这一目标,进行了生命周期成本分析(LCCA),并确定了潜在的节省。结果表明,全生命周期成本为0.31美元/m3,成本主要发生在建设阶段(11.9%)和运行维护阶段(88.1%),处置成本可以忽略不计。通过采用其他材料,如高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)或较小程度上的玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP),可以减少高达42.4%的建筑成本。生命周期中最大的单次成本是曝气(48.9%),需要0.15美元/立方米的支出,但是使用间歇曝气(IA)可以进一步将这一成本降低到0.08美元/立方米。根据这些经济结果,建议进一步研究不同曝气策略的更广泛的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development Engineering
Development Engineering Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Development Engineering: The Journal of Engineering in Economic Development (Dev Eng) is an open access, interdisciplinary journal applying engineering and economic research to the problems of poverty. Published studies must present novel research motivated by a specific global development problem. The journal serves as a bridge between engineers, economists, and other scientists involved in research on human, social, and economic development. Specific topics include: • Engineering research in response to unique constraints imposed by poverty. • Assessment of pro-poor technology solutions, including field performance, consumer adoption, and end-user impacts. • Novel technologies or tools for measuring behavioral, economic, and social outcomes in low-resource settings. • Hypothesis-generating research that explores technology markets and the role of innovation in economic development. • Lessons from the field, especially null results from field trials and technical failure analyses. • Rigorous analysis of existing development "solutions" through an engineering or economic lens. Although the journal focuses on quantitative, scientific approaches, it is intended to be suitable for a wider audience of development practitioners and policy makers, with evidence that can be used to improve decision-making. It also will be useful for engineering and applied economics faculty who conduct research or teach in "technology for development."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信