A cost-benefit analysis of livelihood, environmental and health benefits of a large scale water filter and cookstove distribution in Rwanda

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Christina Barstow , Randall Bluffstone , Kyle Silon , Karl Linden , Evan Thomas
{"title":"A cost-benefit analysis of livelihood, environmental and health benefits of a large scale water filter and cookstove distribution in Rwanda","authors":"Christina Barstow ,&nbsp;Randall Bluffstone ,&nbsp;Kyle Silon ,&nbsp;Karl Linden ,&nbsp;Evan Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.deveng.2019.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Public health interventions targeting contaminated drinking water and indoor air pollution may help to reduce two of the leading causes of death among children under 5 in Rwanda - diarrhea and pneumonia. These interventions also have the potential to provide economic benefits, including reduction in expenditures on fuelwood and time spent on fuelwood collection, environmental benefits through reductions in deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions, and additional economic benefits attributable to health impacts. We evaluate one such large scale intervention, the <em>Tubeho Neza</em> program in Western Rwanda using a cost-benefit analysis. This paper estimates monetized program benefits related to fuelwood savings, time savings, environmental and health benefits, which are then compared to the overall program cost, over a 5 year project year period. The total program cost is estimated at over $11.91 million, and total benefits at the means valued at over $66.67 million, for an estimated mean cost-benefit ratio of over 5.6. A sensitivity analysis of the major factors indicated a cost-benefit ratio range of approximately 1–16. The primary benefit identified is the environmental impact of woodfuel savings attributable to the improved cookstoves. This study estimates 118,000 tonnes of annual woodfuel savings in the Western Province may be attributable to the program in year 1, decreasing to 65,000 tonnes in year 5. These estimates suggest that this program may help to compensate for the government of Rwanda's projected regional woodfuel deficit of 106,000 tonnes per year by 2020. Overall, this study suggests that the <em>Tubeho Neza</em> program provides benefits in excess of the program costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37901,"journal":{"name":"Development Engineering","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.deveng.2019.100043","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728519300491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Public health interventions targeting contaminated drinking water and indoor air pollution may help to reduce two of the leading causes of death among children under 5 in Rwanda - diarrhea and pneumonia. These interventions also have the potential to provide economic benefits, including reduction in expenditures on fuelwood and time spent on fuelwood collection, environmental benefits through reductions in deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions, and additional economic benefits attributable to health impacts. We evaluate one such large scale intervention, the Tubeho Neza program in Western Rwanda using a cost-benefit analysis. This paper estimates monetized program benefits related to fuelwood savings, time savings, environmental and health benefits, which are then compared to the overall program cost, over a 5 year project year period. The total program cost is estimated at over $11.91 million, and total benefits at the means valued at over $66.67 million, for an estimated mean cost-benefit ratio of over 5.6. A sensitivity analysis of the major factors indicated a cost-benefit ratio range of approximately 1–16. The primary benefit identified is the environmental impact of woodfuel savings attributable to the improved cookstoves. This study estimates 118,000 tonnes of annual woodfuel savings in the Western Province may be attributable to the program in year 1, decreasing to 65,000 tonnes in year 5. These estimates suggest that this program may help to compensate for the government of Rwanda's projected regional woodfuel deficit of 106,000 tonnes per year by 2020. Overall, this study suggests that the Tubeho Neza program provides benefits in excess of the program costs.

在卢旺达大规模分发滤水器和炉灶的生计、环境和健康效益成本效益分析
针对受污染饮用水和室内空气污染的公共卫生干预措施可能有助于减少卢旺达5岁以下儿童死亡的两个主要原因——腹泻和肺炎。这些干预措施也有可能带来经济效益,包括减少薪材支出和收集薪材所花费的时间,通过减少森林砍伐和温室气体排放带来的环境效益,以及可归因于健康影响的额外经济效益。我们评估了一个这样的大规模干预,在卢旺达西部的Tubeho Neza项目使用成本效益分析。本文估计了与节省薪材、节省时间、环境和健康效益相关的货币化方案效益,然后将其与5年项目期间的总体方案成本进行比较。项目总成本估计超过1191万美元,总收益估计超过6667万美元,平均成本效益比估计超过5.6。对主要因素的敏感性分析表明,成本效益比范围约为1-16。确定的主要利益是由于改进炉灶而节省木材燃料对环境的影响。这项研究估计,西部省每年节省的118,000吨木材燃料可归因于第一年的计划,第五年减少到65,000吨。这些估计表明,该计划可能有助于弥补卢旺达政府预计到2020年每年106,000吨的区域木燃料赤字。总的来说,这项研究表明,Tubeho Neza项目提供的收益超过了项目成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development Engineering
Development Engineering Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Development Engineering: The Journal of Engineering in Economic Development (Dev Eng) is an open access, interdisciplinary journal applying engineering and economic research to the problems of poverty. Published studies must present novel research motivated by a specific global development problem. The journal serves as a bridge between engineers, economists, and other scientists involved in research on human, social, and economic development. Specific topics include: • Engineering research in response to unique constraints imposed by poverty. • Assessment of pro-poor technology solutions, including field performance, consumer adoption, and end-user impacts. • Novel technologies or tools for measuring behavioral, economic, and social outcomes in low-resource settings. • Hypothesis-generating research that explores technology markets and the role of innovation in economic development. • Lessons from the field, especially null results from field trials and technical failure analyses. • Rigorous analysis of existing development "solutions" through an engineering or economic lens. Although the journal focuses on quantitative, scientific approaches, it is intended to be suitable for a wider audience of development practitioners and policy makers, with evidence that can be used to improve decision-making. It also will be useful for engineering and applied economics faculty who conduct research or teach in "technology for development."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信