¿Existe una correlación entre el volumen ecográfico de la glándula tiroides y la intubación difícil? Un estudio observacional

Basak Ceyda Meco , Zekeriyya Alanoglu , Ali Abbas Yilmaz , Cumhur Basaran , Neslihan Alkis , Seher Demirer , Handan Cuhruk
{"title":"¿Existe una correlación entre el volumen ecográfico de la glándula tiroides y la intubación difícil? Un estudio observacional","authors":"Basak Ceyda Meco ,&nbsp;Zekeriyya Alanoglu ,&nbsp;Ali Abbas Yilmaz ,&nbsp;Cumhur Basaran ,&nbsp;Neslihan Alkis ,&nbsp;Seher Demirer ,&nbsp;Handan Cuhruk","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Preoperative ultrasonographic evaluation of the thyroid gland done by surgeons could let us foresee airway management challenges. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the effects of thyroid-related parameters assessed preoperatively by surgeons via ultrasonography and chest X-ray on intubation conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty patients undergoing thyroid surgery were enrolled. Thyromental distance, Mallampati score, neck circumference and range of neck movement were evaluated before the operation. Thyroid volume, signs of invasion or compression and tracheal deviation on chest X-ray were also noted. The intubation conditions were assessed with Cormack and Lehane score and the intubation difficulty scale (IDS). Statistical analyses were done with SPSS 15.0 software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean thyroid volume of the patients was 26.38<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14<!--> <!-->mL. The median IDS 1 (0-2). Thyromental distance (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.011; <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.36; 95% CI 0.582-0.088), Mallampati score (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.041; <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.29; 95% CI 0.013-0.526), compression or invasion signs (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.041; <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.28; 95% CI 0.006-0.521) and tracheal deviation on chest X-ray (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.041; <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.52; 95% CI 0.268-0.702) were correlated with IDS. Also patients were classified into 2 groups related to their IDS (group <span>I</span>, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->19: IDS<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0; group <span>II</span>, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->31: 1<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->IDS<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->5) and difficult intubation predictors and thyroid-related parameters were compared. Only Mallampati score was significantly different between groups (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.025).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The thyroid volume is not associated with difficult intubation. However clinical assessment parameters may predict difficult intubation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 3","pages":"Pages 230-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.06.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Preoperative ultrasonographic evaluation of the thyroid gland done by surgeons could let us foresee airway management challenges. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the effects of thyroid-related parameters assessed preoperatively by surgeons via ultrasonography and chest X-ray on intubation conditions.

Methods

Fifty patients undergoing thyroid surgery were enrolled. Thyromental distance, Mallampati score, neck circumference and range of neck movement were evaluated before the operation. Thyroid volume, signs of invasion or compression and tracheal deviation on chest X-ray were also noted. The intubation conditions were assessed with Cormack and Lehane score and the intubation difficulty scale (IDS). Statistical analyses were done with SPSS 15.0 software.

Results

The mean thyroid volume of the patients was 26.38 ± 14 mL. The median IDS 1 (0-2). Thyromental distance (P = .011; r = 0.36; 95% CI 0.582-0.088), Mallampati score (P = .041; r = 0.29; 95% CI 0.013-0.526), compression or invasion signs (P = 0.041; r = 0.28; 95% CI 0.006-0.521) and tracheal deviation on chest X-ray (P = 0.041; r = 0.52; 95% CI 0.268-0.702) were correlated with IDS. Also patients were classified into 2 groups related to their IDS (group I, n = 19: IDS = 0; group II, n = 31: 1 < IDS  5) and difficult intubation predictors and thyroid-related parameters were compared. Only Mallampati score was significantly different between groups (P = .025).

Conclusion

The thyroid volume is not associated with difficult intubation. However clinical assessment parameters may predict difficult intubation.

甲状腺超声体积与困难插管之间是否有相关性?观察性研究
背景和目的术前甲状腺超声检查可以让我们预测气道管理的挑战。本观察性研究的目的是评估术前外科医生通过超声和胸片评估的甲状腺相关参数对插管条件的影响。方法选取50例甲状腺手术患者。术前评估甲状腺距离、Mallampati评分、颈围、颈部活动范围。甲状腺体积,侵犯或压迫的迹象和胸片气管偏离也被注意。采用Cormack和Lehane评分和插管困难量表(IDS)评估插管情况。采用SPSS 15.0软件进行统计学分析。结果患者甲状腺体积平均值为26.38±14 mL, IDS中位数为1(0 ~ 2)。甲状腺距离(P = 0.011;r = 0.36;95% CI 0.582-0.088), Mallampati评分(P = 0.041;r = 0.29;95% CI 0.013-0.526),压迫或侵袭迹象(P = 0.041;r = 0.28;95% CI 0.006-0.521)和胸片上气管偏曲(P = 0.041;r = 0.52;95% CI 0.268 ~ 0.702)与IDS相关。根据患者的IDS情况将患者分为2组(I组,n = 19, IDS = 0;第二组,n = 31: 1 <比较IDS≤5)和插管困难的预测指标及甲状腺相关参数。仅Mallampati评分组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.025)。结论甲状腺体积与插管困难无关。然而,临床评估参数可能预测插管困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信