Débora Miranda Diogo Stabille , Augusto Diogo Filho , Beatriz Lemos da Silva Mandim , Lúcio Borges de Araújo , Priscila Miranda Diogo Mesquita , Miguel Tanús Jorge
{"title":"Frecuencia de colonización y bacterias aisladas de punta de catéter epidural implantado para analgesia postoperatoria","authors":"Débora Miranda Diogo Stabille , Augusto Diogo Filho , Beatriz Lemos da Silva Mandim , Lúcio Borges de Araújo , Priscila Miranda Diogo Mesquita , Miguel Tanús Jorge","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The increased use of epidural analgesia with catheter leads to the need to demonstrate the safety of this method and know the incidence of catheter colonization, inserted postoperatively for epidural analgesia, and the bacteria responsible for this colonization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From November 2011 to April 2012, patients electively operated and maintained under epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The catheter tip was collected for semiquantitative and qualitative microbiological analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 68 cultured catheters, 6 tips (8.8%) had positive cultures. No patient had superficial or deep infection. The mean duration of catheter use was 43.45<!--> <!-->h (18-118) (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0894). The type of surgery (contaminated or uncontaminated), physical status of patients, and surgical time showed no relation with the colonization of catheters. Microorganisms isolated from the catheter tip were <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Sphingomonas paucimobilis</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Postoperative epidural catheter analgesia, under this study conditions, was found to be low risk for bacterial colonization in patients at surgical wards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 3","pages":"Pages 200-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The increased use of epidural analgesia with catheter leads to the need to demonstrate the safety of this method and know the incidence of catheter colonization, inserted postoperatively for epidural analgesia, and the bacteria responsible for this colonization.
Methods
From November 2011 to April 2012, patients electively operated and maintained under epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The catheter tip was collected for semiquantitative and qualitative microbiological analysis.
Results
Of 68 cultured catheters, 6 tips (8.8%) had positive cultures. No patient had superficial or deep infection. The mean duration of catheter use was 43.45 h (18-118) (P = .0894). The type of surgery (contaminated or uncontaminated), physical status of patients, and surgical time showed no relation with the colonization of catheters. Microorganisms isolated from the catheter tip were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Sphingomonas paucimobilis.
Conclusion
Postoperative epidural catheter analgesia, under this study conditions, was found to be low risk for bacterial colonization in patients at surgical wards.