Associations of Socioeconomic Factors and Unhealthy Lifestyles with Allostatic Load: A Meta-analysis.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Dehui Yuan, Minghuan Wang, Sisi Bu, Tingyu Mu, Yuhong Li
{"title":"Associations of Socioeconomic Factors and Unhealthy Lifestyles with Allostatic Load: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Dehui Yuan, Minghuan Wang, Sisi Bu, Tingyu Mu, Yuhong Li","doi":"10.1007/s12529-023-10235-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allostatic load (AL) is a biological tool for objectively assessing chronic stress and has been discussed inconsistently for its correlation with socioeconomic factors and unhealthy lifestyles. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to explore the impact of socioeconomic factors and unhealthy lifestyles on AL.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Different databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCOhost, Embase, CNKI, VIP, SinoMed, and Wanfang, were searched from inception to June 6, 2023. A total of 25 studies, reporting the correlations of seven socioeconomic factors and three unhealthy lifestyles with AL, were finally included. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were examined using random-effect and fixed-effect models. Literature quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of high AL in the older individuals as compared to the younger ones (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06), in the individual with low education as compared to those with high education (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.48), and in the individuals with low physical activities as compared to those with high physical activities (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.64). This meta-analysis also showed a significantly decreased risk of high AL in the individuals with high income as compared to those with low income (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83) and in women as compared to men (OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.80-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis showed older people, men, and people having low physical activity, low income, and low education were more likely to have a high AL.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This meta-analysis was registered on the PROSPERO database with trial registration number CRD42022326105. Instead of providing information at registration, we added an author (Tingyu Mu), who provided critical revisions to the paper in this meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54208,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-023-10235-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allostatic load (AL) is a biological tool for objectively assessing chronic stress and has been discussed inconsistently for its correlation with socioeconomic factors and unhealthy lifestyles. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to explore the impact of socioeconomic factors and unhealthy lifestyles on AL.

Method: Different databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCOhost, Embase, CNKI, VIP, SinoMed, and Wanfang, were searched from inception to June 6, 2023. A total of 25 studies, reporting the correlations of seven socioeconomic factors and three unhealthy lifestyles with AL, were finally included. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were examined using random-effect and fixed-effect models. Literature quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias were evaluated.

Results: The meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of high AL in the older individuals as compared to the younger ones (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06), in the individual with low education as compared to those with high education (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.48), and in the individuals with low physical activities as compared to those with high physical activities (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.64). This meta-analysis also showed a significantly decreased risk of high AL in the individuals with high income as compared to those with low income (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83) and in women as compared to men (OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.80-0.81).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed older people, men, and people having low physical activity, low income, and low education were more likely to have a high AL.

Trial registration: This meta-analysis was registered on the PROSPERO database with trial registration number CRD42022326105. Instead of providing information at registration, we added an author (Tingyu Mu), who provided critical revisions to the paper in this meta-analysis.

Abstract Image

社会经济因素和不健康生活方式与异负荷的关系:荟萃分析。
背景:异静态负荷(AL)是一种客观评估慢性压力的生物学工具,由于其与社会经济因素和不健康生活方式的相关性,人们对其的讨论并不一致。因此,本荟萃分析旨在探讨社会经济因素和不健康生活方式对AL的影响。方法:从开始到2023年6月6日,检索不同的数据库,包括Web of Science、PubMed、EBSCOhost、Embase、CNKI、VIP、SinoMed和Wanfang。最终纳入了25项研究,报告了7个社会经济因素和3种不健康生活方式与AL的相关性。使用随机效应和固定效应模型检查合并优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。对文献质量、异质性和发表偏倚进行了评估。结果:荟萃分析显示,与年轻人相比,老年人患高AL的风险显著增加(OR = 1.05,95%CI 1.04-1.06),与受过高等教育的人相比,受教育程度低的人(OR = 1.25,95%CI 1.05-1.48),并且与高体力活动的个体相比,低体力活动的个人(OR = 1.44,95%CI 1.26-1.64)。该荟萃分析还显示,与低收入人群相比,高收入人群患高AL的风险显著降低(OR = 0.77,95%CI 0.71-0.83)和女性与男性相比(OR = 0.80,95%CI 0.80-0.81)。结论:这项荟萃分析显示,老年人、男性和体力活动量低、收入低、受教育程度低的人更有可能患有高AL。试验注册:这项meta分析在PROSPERO数据库中注册,试验注册号CRD42022326105。我们没有在注册时提供信息,而是增加了一位作者(Tingyu Mu),他在这篇荟萃分析中对论文进行了批评性修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM) is the official scientific journal of the International Society for Behavioral Medicine (ISBM). IJBM seeks to present the best theoretically-driven, evidence-based work in the field of behavioral medicine from around the globe. IJBM embraces multiple theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, groups of interest, and levels of analysis. The journal is interested in research across the broad spectrum of behavioral medicine, including health-behavior relationships, the prevention of illness and the promotion of health, the effects of illness on the self and others, the effectiveness of novel interventions, identification of biobehavioral mechanisms, and the influence of social factors on health. We welcome experimental, non-experimental, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as implementation and dissemination research, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信