Impacto de diferentes medicamentos antiepilépticos en la sedación de niños durante la resonancia magnética

Isil Davarci , Murat Karcioglu , Kasim Tuzcu , Fatmagul Basarslan , Ramazan Davran , Erhan Yengil , Cahide Yilmaz , Selim Turhanoglu
{"title":"Impacto de diferentes medicamentos antiepilépticos en la sedación de niños durante la resonancia magnética","authors":"Isil Davarci ,&nbsp;Murat Karcioglu ,&nbsp;Kasim Tuzcu ,&nbsp;Fatmagul Basarslan ,&nbsp;Ramazan Davran ,&nbsp;Erhan Yengil ,&nbsp;Cahide Yilmaz ,&nbsp;Selim Turhanoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>The induction and inhibition of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes by antiepileptic drugs lead to changes in the clearance of anesthetic drugs eliminated via hepatic metabolism. We investigated the duration of the sedation and additional anesthetic needs during magnetic resonance imaging in epileptic children receiving antiepileptic drugs that cause either enzyme induction or inhibition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In American Society of Anesthesiology I–II, 120 children aged 3–10 years were included. Group 1: children using antiepileptic drugs that cause cytochrome P450 enzyme induction; Group 2: those using antiepileptic drugs that cause inhibition; and Group 3: those that did not use antiepileptic drugs. Sedation was induced with the use of 0.05 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> midazolam and 1 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> propofol. An additional 0.05 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> of midazolam and rescue propofol (0.5 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>) were administered and repeated to maintain sedation. The duration of sedation and the additional sedation needed were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The duration of the initial dose was significantly shorter in Group I compared with groups II and III (<em>p</em> = 0.001, <em>p</em> = 0.003, respectively). It was significantly longer in Group II compared with groups I and III (<em>p</em> = 0.001, <em>p</em> = 0.029, respectively). The additional midazolam needed for adequate sedation was increased in Group I when compared with groups II and III (<em>p</em> = 0.010, <em>p</em> = 0.001, respectively). In addition, the rescue propofol dose was significantly higher only in Group I when compared with Group III (<em>p</em> = 0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In epileptic children, the response variability to the initial sedative agents during the magnetic resonance imaging procedure resulting from the inhibition or induction of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes by the antiepileptic drugs mandated the titration of anesthetic agents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"64 5","pages":"Pages 320-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.10.012","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496313002262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objectives

The induction and inhibition of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes by antiepileptic drugs lead to changes in the clearance of anesthetic drugs eliminated via hepatic metabolism. We investigated the duration of the sedation and additional anesthetic needs during magnetic resonance imaging in epileptic children receiving antiepileptic drugs that cause either enzyme induction or inhibition.

Methods

In American Society of Anesthesiology I–II, 120 children aged 3–10 years were included. Group 1: children using antiepileptic drugs that cause cytochrome P450 enzyme induction; Group 2: those using antiepileptic drugs that cause inhibition; and Group 3: those that did not use antiepileptic drugs. Sedation was induced with the use of 0.05 mg kg−1 midazolam and 1 mg kg−1 propofol. An additional 0.05 mg kg−1 of midazolam and rescue propofol (0.5 mg kg−1) were administered and repeated to maintain sedation. The duration of sedation and the additional sedation needed were compared.

Results

The duration of the initial dose was significantly shorter in Group I compared with groups II and III (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). It was significantly longer in Group II compared with groups I and III (p = 0.001, p = 0.029, respectively). The additional midazolam needed for adequate sedation was increased in Group I when compared with groups II and III (p = 0.010, p = 0.001, respectively). In addition, the rescue propofol dose was significantly higher only in Group I when compared with Group III (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

In epileptic children, the response variability to the initial sedative agents during the magnetic resonance imaging procedure resulting from the inhibition or induction of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes by the antiepileptic drugs mandated the titration of anesthetic agents.

不同抗癫痫药物对儿童磁共振镇静的影响
背景与目的抗癫痫药物对细胞色素P450同工酶的诱导和抑制可改变经肝代谢消除的麻醉药物的清除率。我们研究了癫痫儿童在接受抗癫痫药物引起酶诱导或抑制的磁共振成像期间镇静的持续时间和额外的麻醉需求。方法美国麻醉学学会I-II收录3-10岁儿童120例。第一组:使用引起细胞色素P450酶诱导的抗癫痫药物的儿童;第二组:使用抗癫痫药物引起抑制的患者;第三组:未使用抗癫痫药物的组。用0.05 mg kg - 1咪达唑仑和1 mg kg - 1异丙酚诱导镇静。另外给予0.05 mg kg - 1咪达唑仑和抢救异丙酚(0.5 mg kg - 1)以维持镇静。比较镇静持续时间和所需的额外镇静。结果ⅰ组初始给药时间明显短于ⅱ组和ⅲ组(p = 0.001, p = 0.003)。与I组和III组相比,II组的时间明显更长(p = 0.001, p = 0.029)。与II组和III组相比,I组用于充分镇静所需的额外咪达唑仑增加(p = 0.010, p = 0.001)。此外,只有I组异丙酚抢救剂量显著高于III组(p = 0.002)。结论癫痫患儿在磁共振成像过程中,抗癫痫药物对细胞色素P450同工酶的抑制或诱导导致了对初始镇静药物的反应变异性,这要求麻醉药物的滴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信