Efecto de diferentes dosis de esmolol sobre la respuesta hemodinámica, BIS y respuesta de movimiento durante la intubación orotraqueal: estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego

Mensure Yılmaz Çakırgöz , Aydın Taşdöğen , Çimen Olguner , Hülya Korkmaz , Ertuğrul Öğün , Burak Küçükebe , Esra Duran
{"title":"Efecto de diferentes dosis de esmolol sobre la respuesta hemodinámica, BIS y respuesta de movimiento durante la intubación orotraqueal: estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego","authors":"Mensure Yılmaz Çakırgöz ,&nbsp;Aydın Taşdöğen ,&nbsp;Çimen Olguner ,&nbsp;Hülya Korkmaz ,&nbsp;Ertuğrul Öğün ,&nbsp;Burak Küçükebe ,&nbsp;Esra Duran","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A prospective, randomized and double-blind study was planned to identify the optimum dose of esmolol infusion to suppress the increase in bispectral index values and the movement and hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>120 patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups in a double-blind fashion. 2.5<!--> <!-->mg<!--> <!-->kg<sup>−1</sup> propofol was administered for anesthesia induction. After loss of consciousness, and before administration of 0.6<!--> <!-->mg<!--> <!-->kg<sup>−1</sup> rocuronium, a tourniquet was applied to one arm and inflated to 50<!--> <!-->mmHg greater than systolic pressure. The patients were divided into 3 groups; 1<!--> <!-->mg<!--> <!-->kg<sup>−1</sup> <!-->h<sup>−1</sup> esmolol was given as the loading dose and in Group Es50 50<!--> <!-->μg<!--> <!-->kg<sup>−1</sup> <!-->min<sup>−1</sup>, in Group Es150 150<!--> <!-->μg<!--> <!-->kg<sup>−1</sup> <!-->min<sup>−1</sup>, and in Group Es250 250<!--> <!-->μg<!--> <!-->kg<sup>−1</sup> <!-->min<sup>−1</sup> esmolol infusion was started. Five minutes after the esmolol has been begun, the trachea was intubated; gross movement within the first minute after orotracheal intubation was recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Incidence of movement response and the ΔBIS max values were comparable in Group Es250 and Group Es150, but these values were significantly higher in Group Es50 than in the other two groups. In all three groups in the 1st minute after tracheal intubation heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly higher compared to values from before intubation (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05). In the study period there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of heart rate and mean arterial pressure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In clinical practise we believe that after 1<!--> <!-->mg<!--> <!-->kg<sup>−1</sup> loading dose, 150<!--> <!-->μg<!--> <!-->kg<sup>−1</sup> <!-->min<sup>−1</sup> i.v. esmolol dose is sufficient to suppress responses to tracheal intubation without increasing side effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"64 6","pages":"Pages 425-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.09.007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496313001967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

A prospective, randomized and double-blind study was planned to identify the optimum dose of esmolol infusion to suppress the increase in bispectral index values and the movement and hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation.

Materials and methods

120 patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups in a double-blind fashion. 2.5 mg kg−1 propofol was administered for anesthesia induction. After loss of consciousness, and before administration of 0.6 mg kg−1 rocuronium, a tourniquet was applied to one arm and inflated to 50 mmHg greater than systolic pressure. The patients were divided into 3 groups; 1 mg kg−1 h−1 esmolol was given as the loading dose and in Group Es50 50 μg kg−1 min−1, in Group Es150 150 μg kg−1 min−1, and in Group Es250 250 μg kg−1 min−1 esmolol infusion was started. Five minutes after the esmolol has been begun, the trachea was intubated; gross movement within the first minute after orotracheal intubation was recorded.

Results

Incidence of movement response and the ΔBIS max values were comparable in Group Es250 and Group Es150, but these values were significantly higher in Group Es50 than in the other two groups. In all three groups in the 1st minute after tracheal intubation heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly higher compared to values from before intubation (p < 0.05). In the study period there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of heart rate and mean arterial pressure.

Conclusion

In clinical practise we believe that after 1 mg kg−1 loading dose, 150 μg kg−1 min−1 i.v. esmolol dose is sufficient to suppress responses to tracheal intubation without increasing side effects.

不同剂量艾司洛尔对气管插管过程中血流动力学反应、BIS和运动反应的影响:前瞻性、随机、双盲研究
目的通过前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,确定艾司洛尔输注抑制气管插管双谱指数升高及运动和血流动力学反应的最佳剂量。材料与方法120例患者采用双盲法随机分为三组。麻醉诱导用异丙酚2.5 mg kg−1。在失去意识后,在给予0.6 mg kg - 1罗库溴铵之前,在一只手臂上使用止血带,并将其充气至高于收缩压的50 mmHg。患者分为3组;以艾司洛尔1 mg kg−1 h−1作为载药剂量,Es50组50 μg kg−1 min−1,Es150组150 μg kg−1 min−1,Es250组250 μg kg−1 min−1开始注射艾司洛尔。艾司洛尔开始使用5分钟后,气管插管;记录气管插管后1分钟内大体运动情况。结果Es250组和Es150组的运动反应发生率和ΔBIS max值具有可比性,但Es50组的运动反应发生率和ΔBIS max值明显高于其他两组。三组患者气管插管后1分钟心率和平均动脉压均显著高于插管前(p <0.05)。在研究期间,两组之间在心率和平均动脉压方面没有显著差异。结论在临床实践中,我们认为在1 mg kg−1负荷剂量后,150 μg kg−1 min−1静脉注射艾司洛尔足以抑制气管插管反应而不增加副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信