Morfina como primer medicamento para el tratamiento del dolor de cáncer

Beatriz C. Nunes, João Batista dos Santos Garcia, Rioko Kimiko Sakata
{"title":"Morfina como primer medicamento para el tratamiento del dolor de cáncer","authors":"Beatriz C. Nunes,&nbsp;João Batista dos Santos Garcia,&nbsp;Rioko Kimiko Sakata","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>The medications used according to the recommendation of the World Health Organization do not promote pain relief in a number of patients with cancer pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of morphine as first medication for the treatment of moderate cancer pain in patients with advanced and/or metastatic disease, as an option to the recommendations of the World Health Organization analgesic ladder.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Sixty patients without opioid therapy, with ≥18 years of age, were randomized into two groups. G1 patients received medication according to the analgesic ladder and started treatment with non-opioids in the first, weak opioids in the second, and strong opioids in the third step; G2 patients received morphine as first analgesic medication. The efficacy and tolerability of initial use of morphine were evaluated every two weeks for three months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The groups were similar with respect to demographic data. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding pain intensity, quality of life, physical capacity, satisfaction with treatment, need for complementation and dose of morphine. In G1 there was a higher incidence of nausea (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0088), drowsiness (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0005), constipation (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0071) and dizziness (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0376) in the second visit and drowsiness (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05) in the third.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of morphine as first medication for pain treatment did not promote better analgesic effect than the ladder recommended by World Health Organization, with higher incidence of adverse effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"64 4","pages":"Pages 236-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.06.018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496313002018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

The medications used according to the recommendation of the World Health Organization do not promote pain relief in a number of patients with cancer pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of morphine as first medication for the treatment of moderate cancer pain in patients with advanced and/or metastatic disease, as an option to the recommendations of the World Health Organization analgesic ladder.

Method

Sixty patients without opioid therapy, with ≥18 years of age, were randomized into two groups. G1 patients received medication according to the analgesic ladder and started treatment with non-opioids in the first, weak opioids in the second, and strong opioids in the third step; G2 patients received morphine as first analgesic medication. The efficacy and tolerability of initial use of morphine were evaluated every two weeks for three months.

Results

The groups were similar with respect to demographic data. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding pain intensity, quality of life, physical capacity, satisfaction with treatment, need for complementation and dose of morphine. In G1 there was a higher incidence of nausea (p = 0.0088), drowsiness (p = 0.0005), constipation (p = 0.0071) and dizziness (p = 0.0376) in the second visit and drowsiness (p = 0.05) in the third.

Conclusions

The use of morphine as first medication for pain treatment did not promote better analgesic effect than the ladder recommended by World Health Organization, with higher incidence of adverse effects.

吗啡作为治疗癌症疼痛的第一种药物
背景和目的根据世界卫生组织推荐使用的药物不能促进一些癌症疼痛患者的疼痛缓解。本研究的目的是评估吗啡作为治疗晚期和/或转移性疾病患者中度癌性疼痛的首选药物,作为世界卫生组织镇痛阶梯推荐的一种选择。方法60例年龄≥18岁,未经阿片类药物治疗的患者随机分为两组。G1患者按照镇痛阶梯用药,第一步开始非阿片类药物治疗,第二步开始弱阿片类药物治疗,第三步开始强阿片类药物治疗;G2患者以吗啡为首发镇痛药。每两周评估一次吗啡初始使用的疗效和耐受性,持续三个月。结果两组人口学数据相似。两组患者在疼痛强度、生活质量、身体能力、治疗满意度、辅助用药需求、吗啡剂量等方面均无显著差异。G1组患者第二次就诊时恶心(p = 0.0088)、嗜睡(p = 0.0005)、便秘(p = 0.0071)和头晕(p = 0.0376)发生率较高,第三次就诊时嗜睡(p = 0.05)发生率较高。结论吗啡作为首选镇痛药物,其镇痛效果并不比世界卫生组织推荐的阶梯镇痛效果好,而且不良反应发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信