Microparticle subpopulations are potential markers of disease progression and vascular dysfunction across a spectrum of connective tissue disease

E.M. McCarthy , D. Moreno-Martinez , F.L. Wilkinson , N.J. McHugh , I.N. Bruce , J.D. Pauling , M.Y. Alexander , B. Parker
{"title":"Microparticle subpopulations are potential markers of disease progression and vascular dysfunction across a spectrum of connective tissue disease","authors":"E.M. McCarthy ,&nbsp;D. Moreno-Martinez ,&nbsp;F.L. Wilkinson ,&nbsp;N.J. McHugh ,&nbsp;I.N. Bruce ,&nbsp;J.D. Pauling ,&nbsp;M.Y. Alexander ,&nbsp;B. Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Microparticles (MPs) are membrane-bound vesicles derived from vascular and intravascular cells such as endothelial cells (EMPs) and platelets (PMPs). We investigated EMP and PMP numbers across a spectrum of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) with the aim of comparing the levels of, and relationship between, EMPs and PMPs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->24), Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->24), Primary Raynauds Phenomenon (RP) (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->17) and “other CTD” (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->15) (Primary Sjogrens Syndrome, UCTD or MCTD) as well as 15 healthy controls were recruited. EMPs and PMPs were quantified using flow cytometry. Associations between MP levels and objective functional vascular assessments were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SLE patients had significantly higher EMPs compared with healthy controls and SSc patients. Higher PMP levels were noted in SSc and primary RP when compared to healthy controls and ‘other CTD’ patients. A modest correlation was noted between EMP and PMP levels in healthy controls (Spearman <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.6, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.017). This relationship appeared stronger in SLE (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.72, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001) and other CTD patients (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.75, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). The association between EMPs and PMPs was notably less strong in SSc (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.45, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014) and RP (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.15). A significantly lower EMP/PMP ratio was detected in SSc/RP patients in comparison to both healthy controls and SLE/other CTD patients. Higher EMP and PMP levels were associated with higher digital perfusion following cold challenge in SSc. In contrast, higher PMP (but not EMP) levels were associated with lower digital perfusion at both baseline and following cold challenge in primary RP. Higher PMP levels were associated with greater endothelial-independent dilation in patients with SLE.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MP populations differ across the spectrum of AIRDS, possibly reflecting differences in vascular cell injury and activation. MP levels are associated with functional assessments of vascular function and might have a role as novel vascular biomarkers in AIRDs.</p></div><div><h3>Significance and innovations</h3><p>Levels of circulating endothelial and platelet microparticles differ between SSc/primary RP compared with SLE and other CTDs (UCTD, MCTD and Primary Sjogrens). MP release may occur within different vascular sites across these disease groups (macrovascular and microvascular).</p><p>The association between circulating MP levels and objective assessment of macro- and microvascular dysfunction within these disease areas suggests that MPs might have a useful role as novel circulating biomarkers of vascular disease within the CTDs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72344,"journal":{"name":"BBA clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.11.003","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BBA clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214647416300587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Objective

Microparticles (MPs) are membrane-bound vesicles derived from vascular and intravascular cells such as endothelial cells (EMPs) and platelets (PMPs). We investigated EMP and PMP numbers across a spectrum of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) with the aim of comparing the levels of, and relationship between, EMPs and PMPs.

Methods

Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (n = 24), Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) (n = 24), Primary Raynauds Phenomenon (RP) (n = 17) and “other CTD” (n = 15) (Primary Sjogrens Syndrome, UCTD or MCTD) as well as 15 healthy controls were recruited. EMPs and PMPs were quantified using flow cytometry. Associations between MP levels and objective functional vascular assessments were evaluated.

Results

SLE patients had significantly higher EMPs compared with healthy controls and SSc patients. Higher PMP levels were noted in SSc and primary RP when compared to healthy controls and ‘other CTD’ patients. A modest correlation was noted between EMP and PMP levels in healthy controls (Spearman r = 0.6, p = 0.017). This relationship appeared stronger in SLE (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) and other CTD patients (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001). The association between EMPs and PMPs was notably less strong in SSc (r = 0.45, p = 0.014) and RP (r = 0.37, p = 0.15). A significantly lower EMP/PMP ratio was detected in SSc/RP patients in comparison to both healthy controls and SLE/other CTD patients. Higher EMP and PMP levels were associated with higher digital perfusion following cold challenge in SSc. In contrast, higher PMP (but not EMP) levels were associated with lower digital perfusion at both baseline and following cold challenge in primary RP. Higher PMP levels were associated with greater endothelial-independent dilation in patients with SLE.

Conclusion

MP populations differ across the spectrum of AIRDS, possibly reflecting differences in vascular cell injury and activation. MP levels are associated with functional assessments of vascular function and might have a role as novel vascular biomarkers in AIRDs.

Significance and innovations

Levels of circulating endothelial and platelet microparticles differ between SSc/primary RP compared with SLE and other CTDs (UCTD, MCTD and Primary Sjogrens). MP release may occur within different vascular sites across these disease groups (macrovascular and microvascular).

The association between circulating MP levels and objective assessment of macro- and microvascular dysfunction within these disease areas suggests that MPs might have a useful role as novel circulating biomarkers of vascular disease within the CTDs.

微粒亚群是结缔组织疾病进展和血管功能障碍的潜在标志
微颗粒(MPs)是来源于血管细胞和血管内细胞(如内皮细胞(EMPs)和血小板(pmp))的膜结合囊泡。我们研究了一系列自身免疫性风湿性疾病(AIRDs)的EMP和PMP数量,目的是比较EMP和PMP的水平及其之间的关系。方法招募系统性红斑狼疮(SLE) (n = 24)、系统性硬化症(SSc) (n = 24)、原发性雷氏现象(RP) (n = 17)和“其他CTD”(原发性Sjogrens综合征、UCTD或MCTD)患者以及15名健康对照组。流式细胞术定量测定EMPs和pmp。评估MP水平与客观血管功能评估之间的关系。结果SSc患者的emp明显高于健康对照组和SSc患者。与健康对照组和“其他CTD”患者相比,SSc和原发性RP患者的PMP水平较高。在健康对照组中,EMP和PMP水平之间存在适度的相关性(Spearman r = 0.6, p = 0.017)。这种关系在SLE中更为明显(r = 0.72, p <0.0001)和其他CTD患者(r = 0.75, p <0.0001)。在SSc (r = 0.45, p = 0.014)和RP (r = 0.37, p = 0.15)中,EMPs和pmp之间的相关性较弱。与健康对照组和SLE/其他CTD患者相比,SSc/RP患者的EMP/PMP比值显著降低。较高的EMP和PMP水平与SSc冷激后较高的数字灌注相关。相比之下,在原发性RP的基线和冷刺激后,较高的PMP(而不是EMP)水平与较低的数字灌注相关。在SLE患者中,较高的PMP水平与更大的内皮非依赖性扩张相关。结论mp群体在AIRDS谱上存在差异,可能反映了血管细胞损伤和激活的差异。MP水平与血管功能评估相关,可能在aird中作为新的血管生物标志物。与SLE和其他CTDs (UCTD、MCTD和原发性Sjogrens)相比,SSc/原发性RP的循环内皮细胞和血小板微粒水平存在差异。MP释放可能发生在这些疾病组(大血管和微血管)的不同血管部位。循环MP水平与这些疾病区域内大血管和微血管功能障碍的客观评估之间的关联表明,MPs可能作为CTDs内血管疾病的新型循环生物标志物具有有用的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信