{"title":"Analysis and Adjustment of Vertebral Subluxation as a Separate and Distinct Identity for the Chiropractic Profession: A Commentary","authors":"John Hart DC, MHSc","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2016.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The purpose of this paper is to discuss various statements related to chiropractic identity from</span><sup>1</sup> D. D. Palmer<sup>2</sup>; selected chiropractic organizations, associations, and colleges; and<sup>3</sup> attitudes and perceptions of chiropractic from chiropractic students, practitioners, and patients.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p><span>For comparison purposes, identity statements and perceptions from the various chiropractic associations and colleges, as well as from students and patients, were explored. Identity statements for chiropractic were searched in various sources such as Palmer’s 1910 textbook, recent literature on viewpoints from chiropractic students and practitioners, and websites for chiropractic colleges and organizations. Palmer taught that the chiropractor’s focus was on vertebral subluxation<span>. Today, a number of chiropractic colleges and organizations continue to include the vertebral subluxation model in their instruction, with a majority of students and practitioners subscribing to the model. Conversely, a number of other colleges and organizations portray chiropractic as being essentially about the treatment<span> of back and neck pain, which is what patients associate with chiropractic. However, settling on any particular identity for the chiropractic profession will likely be met with resistance by some, given the plethora of opinions among chiropractic professionals as to what the identity of the chiropractic profession should be. Common ground between the different factions within the chiropractic profession might be found in a unifying expression such as “functional </span></span></span>neurology.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When a profession’s identity is not clear with respect to its area of interest and mission, then the public may be less inclined to seek its services. Identifying the chiropractic profession with a focus on vertebral subluxation would give the profession uniqueness not duplicated by other health care professions and, therefore, might legitimatize the existence of chiropractic as a health care profession. An identity having a focus on vertebral subluxation would also be consistent with the original intent of the founding of the chiropractic profession.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"23 1","pages":"Pages 46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2016.09.002","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349916300055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this paper is to discuss various statements related to chiropractic identity from1 D. D. Palmer2; selected chiropractic organizations, associations, and colleges; and3 attitudes and perceptions of chiropractic from chiropractic students, practitioners, and patients.
Discussion
For comparison purposes, identity statements and perceptions from the various chiropractic associations and colleges, as well as from students and patients, were explored. Identity statements for chiropractic were searched in various sources such as Palmer’s 1910 textbook, recent literature on viewpoints from chiropractic students and practitioners, and websites for chiropractic colleges and organizations. Palmer taught that the chiropractor’s focus was on vertebral subluxation. Today, a number of chiropractic colleges and organizations continue to include the vertebral subluxation model in their instruction, with a majority of students and practitioners subscribing to the model. Conversely, a number of other colleges and organizations portray chiropractic as being essentially about the treatment of back and neck pain, which is what patients associate with chiropractic. However, settling on any particular identity for the chiropractic profession will likely be met with resistance by some, given the plethora of opinions among chiropractic professionals as to what the identity of the chiropractic profession should be. Common ground between the different factions within the chiropractic profession might be found in a unifying expression such as “functional neurology.”
Conclusion
When a profession’s identity is not clear with respect to its area of interest and mission, then the public may be less inclined to seek its services. Identifying the chiropractic profession with a focus on vertebral subluxation would give the profession uniqueness not duplicated by other health care professions and, therefore, might legitimatize the existence of chiropractic as a health care profession. An identity having a focus on vertebral subluxation would also be consistent with the original intent of the founding of the chiropractic profession.
目的:本文的目的是讨论来自1 . D. D.帕尔默2 .有关捏脊认同的各种说法;选定的脊医组织、协会和学院;捏脊学生、从业人员和患者对捏脊疗法的态度和看法。为了比较的目的,我们从不同的脊医协会和学院,以及学生和病人的身份陈述和看法进行了探讨。脊骨疗法的身份声明在各种来源进行了搜索,如帕尔默1910年的教科书,最近关于脊骨疗法学生和从业者观点的文献,以及脊骨疗法学院和组织的网站。帕尔默教授说,脊椎指压师的重点是治疗椎体半脱位。今天,许多脊椎指压学院和组织继续在他们的教学中包括椎体半脱位模型,大多数学生和从业者都订阅了这个模型。相反,其他一些大学和组织将脊椎指压疗法描述为基本上是治疗背部和颈部疼痛,这是患者与脊椎指压疗法的联系。然而,考虑到脊椎治疗专业人士对脊椎治疗专业的身份应该是什么有太多的意见,为脊椎治疗专业确定任何特定的身份可能会遭到一些人的抵制。在脊椎指压治疗专业的不同派别之间的共同点可能是一个统一的表达,如“功能神经病学”。结论:当一个职业的身份在其兴趣领域和使命方面不明确时,公众可能不太愿意寻求其服务。将脊椎指压治疗职业的重点放在椎体半脱位上,将使该职业具有其他医疗保健职业无法复制的独特性,因此,可能使脊椎指压治疗作为一种医疗保健职业的存在合法化。专注于椎体半脱位的身份也符合脊椎指压专业成立的初衷。