Core and Complementary Chiropractic: Lowering Barriers to Patient Utilization of Services

Q3 Health Professions
John J. Triano DC, PhD, Marion McGregor DC, PhD
{"title":"Core and Complementary Chiropractic: Lowering Barriers to Patient Utilization of Services","authors":"John J. Triano DC, PhD,&nbsp;Marion McGregor DC, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2016.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The use of chiropractic services has stalled while interest in accessing manipulation services is rising. The purpose of this paper is to consider this dilemma in the context of the dynamics of professional socialization, surveys of public attitudes, and a potential strategic action.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p><span>This is a reflection work grounded in the literature on professional socialization and the attitudes held regarding chiropractic in modern society, to include its members, and in original data on training programs. Data were interpreted on the background of the authors’ cross-cultural experiences spanning patient care, research, education, and interprofessional collaboration. Recommendation on a strategic action to counter barriers in patient<span> referrals was synthesized. Professional socialization is the process by which society enables professional privilege. Illustration of typical and divergent professional socialization models emerged that explain cognitive dissonance toward the profession. Questions of trust are commensurate with the experiences during patient encounters rather than with a common identity for the profession. Diversity among encounters perpetuates the uncertainty that affects referral sources. Commonality as an anchor for consistent professional identity and socialization through the content of core chiropractic, defined by training and practice, offers a means to offset uncertainty. Complementary chiropractic, analogous to </span></span>complementary medicine, provides an outlet under professional socialization for the interests to explore additional methods of care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The practice workplace is an effective lever for altering barriers to the use of services. Clarifying rhetoric through conceptualization of core and complementary practices simplifies the socialization dynamic. Further, it takes advantage of accepted cultural semantics in meaningful analogy while continuing to empower practical diversity in care delivery in response to evolving scientific evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"23 1","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2016.07.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349916300092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective

The use of chiropractic services has stalled while interest in accessing manipulation services is rising. The purpose of this paper is to consider this dilemma in the context of the dynamics of professional socialization, surveys of public attitudes, and a potential strategic action.

Discussion

This is a reflection work grounded in the literature on professional socialization and the attitudes held regarding chiropractic in modern society, to include its members, and in original data on training programs. Data were interpreted on the background of the authors’ cross-cultural experiences spanning patient care, research, education, and interprofessional collaboration. Recommendation on a strategic action to counter barriers in patient referrals was synthesized. Professional socialization is the process by which society enables professional privilege. Illustration of typical and divergent professional socialization models emerged that explain cognitive dissonance toward the profession. Questions of trust are commensurate with the experiences during patient encounters rather than with a common identity for the profession. Diversity among encounters perpetuates the uncertainty that affects referral sources. Commonality as an anchor for consistent professional identity and socialization through the content of core chiropractic, defined by training and practice, offers a means to offset uncertainty. Complementary chiropractic, analogous to complementary medicine, provides an outlet under professional socialization for the interests to explore additional methods of care.

Conclusion

The practice workplace is an effective lever for altering barriers to the use of services. Clarifying rhetoric through conceptualization of core and complementary practices simplifies the socialization dynamic. Further, it takes advantage of accepted cultural semantics in meaningful analogy while continuing to empower practical diversity in care delivery in response to evolving scientific evidence.

核心和补充脊椎指压疗法:降低患者利用服务的障碍。
目的:脊医服务的使用停滞不前,而对获取手法服务的兴趣正在上升。本文的目的是在专业社会化的动态背景下考虑这一困境,公众态度的调查,以及潜在的战略行动。讨论:这是一个基于专业社会化文献和现代社会对脊椎指压疗法的态度的反思工作,包括其成员,以及培训计划的原始数据。数据以作者的跨文化经历为背景进行解释,包括患者护理、研究、教育和跨专业合作。综合了关于采取战略行动消除患者转诊障碍的建议。职业社会化是社会赋予职业特权的过程。出现了典型的和不同的职业社会化模型,解释了对职业的认知失调。信任问题是与病人接触期间的经验相称的,而不是与职业的共同身份相称的。接触的多样性使影响转诊来源的不确定性永久化。通过训练和实践所定义的核心脊医内容,共性作为一致的职业身份和社会化的锚点,提供了一种抵消不确定性的手段。与补充医学类似,补充脊椎指压疗法在专业社会化的条件下为利益相关者提供了一个探索其他护理方法的出口。结论:实习场所是改变服务使用障碍的有效杠杆。通过核心实践和互补实践的概念化来澄清修辞学,简化了社会化动态。此外,它在有意义的类比中利用了公认的文化语义,同时继续赋予护理服务的实际多样性,以响应不断发展的科学证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信