Chiropractic Identity: A Neurological, Professional, and Political Assessment

Q3 Health Professions
Anthony L. Rosner PhD, LLD (Hon)
{"title":"Chiropractic Identity: A Neurological, Professional, and Political Assessment","authors":"Anthony L. Rosner PhD, LLD (Hon)","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2016.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The purpose of this article is to propose a focused assessment of the identity of chiropractic<span> and its profession, triangulating multiple viewpoints converging upon various aspects and definitions of </span></span>neurology<span>, manual medicine, and alternative or mainstream medicine.</span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p><span>Over 120 years since its inception, chiropractic has struggled to achieve an identity for which its foundations could provide optimal health care. Despite recognition of the benefits of </span>spinal manipulation<span><span> in various government guidelines, advances in US military and Veterans Administration, and persistently high levels of patient satisfaction, the chiropractic profession remains underrepresented in most discussions of health care delivery. Distinguishing characteristics of doctors of chiropractic include the following: (1) they embrace a model of holistic, </span>preventive medicine<span> (wellness); (2) they embrace a concept of neurological imbalance in which form follows function, disease follows disturbed biochemistry, and phenomenology<span> follows physiology; (3) they diagnose, and their institutions of training are accredited by a body recognized by the US Department of Education; (4) they manage patients on a first-contact basis, often as primary care providers in geographical areas that are underserved; (5) the spine is their primary—but not exclusive—area of interaction; (6) they deliver high-velocity, low-amplitude adjustments with a superior safety record compared with other professions; and (7) they use a network of institutions worldwide that have shown increasing commitments to research.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This article provides an overview of chiropractic identity from 6 points of view: (1) concepts of manual medicine; (2) areas of interest beyond the spine; (3) concepts of the chiropractic subluxation; (4) concepts of neurology; (5) concepts of mainstream or alternative health care; and (6) concepts of primary care, first-contact provider, or specialist.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"23 1","pages":"Pages 35-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2016.05.001","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155634991630002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this article is to propose a focused assessment of the identity of chiropractic and its profession, triangulating multiple viewpoints converging upon various aspects and definitions of neurology, manual medicine, and alternative or mainstream medicine.

Discussion

Over 120 years since its inception, chiropractic has struggled to achieve an identity for which its foundations could provide optimal health care. Despite recognition of the benefits of spinal manipulation in various government guidelines, advances in US military and Veterans Administration, and persistently high levels of patient satisfaction, the chiropractic profession remains underrepresented in most discussions of health care delivery. Distinguishing characteristics of doctors of chiropractic include the following: (1) they embrace a model of holistic, preventive medicine (wellness); (2) they embrace a concept of neurological imbalance in which form follows function, disease follows disturbed biochemistry, and phenomenology follows physiology; (3) they diagnose, and their institutions of training are accredited by a body recognized by the US Department of Education; (4) they manage patients on a first-contact basis, often as primary care providers in geographical areas that are underserved; (5) the spine is their primary—but not exclusive—area of interaction; (6) they deliver high-velocity, low-amplitude adjustments with a superior safety record compared with other professions; and (7) they use a network of institutions worldwide that have shown increasing commitments to research.

Conclusion

This article provides an overview of chiropractic identity from 6 points of view: (1) concepts of manual medicine; (2) areas of interest beyond the spine; (3) concepts of the chiropractic subluxation; (4) concepts of neurology; (5) concepts of mainstream or alternative health care; and (6) concepts of primary care, first-contact provider, or specialist.

脊医身份:神经学、专业和政治评估
本文的目的是对脊椎指压疗法及其专业的身份进行集中评估,对神经病学、手工医学、替代医学或主流医学的各个方面和定义进行三角化分析。自成立以来的120多年里,脊椎指压疗法一直在努力实现其基础可以提供最佳医疗保健的身份。尽管各种政府指南都承认脊椎推拿的好处,美国军方和退伍军人管理局也取得了进展,患者满意度也一直很高,但在大多数关于医疗保健服务的讨论中,脊椎推拿专业的代表性仍然不足。捏脊医生的显著特点包括:(1)他们采用整体预防医学(健康)模式;(2)他们信奉一种神经失衡的概念,即形式追随功能,疾病追随生物化学紊乱,现象学追随生理学;(3)他们诊断,并且他们的培训机构是由美国教育部认可的机构认可的;(4)他们以第一次接触的方式管理患者,通常在服务不足的地理区域担任初级保健提供者;(5)脊柱是它们主要的——但不是唯一的——互动区域;(六)高速、低幅度调整,安全记录优于其他行业的;(7)他们利用了一个由世界各地的机构组成的网络,这些机构对研究的投入越来越大。结论本文从6个方面对捏脊认同进行概述:(1)手法医学的概念;(2)脊柱以外的兴趣区域;(3)捏脊半脱位的概念;(4)神经学概念;(5)主流或替代医疗保健的概念;(6)初级保健、首次接触提供者或专家的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信