Predictors of neck bleeding after carotid endarterectomy: A 5 year revision

Ana Ferreira, Mário Vieira, Sérgio Sampaio, Alfredo Cerqueira, José Teixeira
{"title":"Predictors of neck bleeding after carotid endarterectomy: A 5 year revision","authors":"Ana Ferreira,&nbsp;Mário Vieira,&nbsp;Sérgio Sampaio,&nbsp;Alfredo Cerqueira,&nbsp;José Teixeira","doi":"10.1016/j.ancv.2015.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of neck bleeding, requiring or not surgical intervention, after carotid endarterectomy (CE) and to identify its predictive parameters and its influence in stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective review of 200 CEs carried out in 194 patients between 2010 and 2014 in our institution. The endpoints were: postoperative major cervical bleeding MB (that required reintervention) and global cervical bleeding GB (registered neck bleeding) as also its major post reintervention complications. Patient demographics, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy (pre, intra and postoperative), anesthetic data, surgical technique, and perioperative management data were collected. Univariate analysis with Pearson chi-Squared or Fisher Test was applied for categorical variables and <em>t</em>-test for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Neck bleeding after CE occurred in 25 cases (12%), requiring reoperation in 8 cases (4.0%). Univariate analysis (Pearson chi-squared test) showed significance (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) for global hematoma in which concerns clopidogrel use until surgery (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04), elevated mean arterial pressure during hospitalar stay (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006). For major hematoma it has significance previous dual antiplatelet therapy (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.039), patch use compared to other techniques (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.017), and neurological repercurssion after clamping (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03). Individual analysis of surgical technique did not show significant value for major or global hematoma. There were to 2 deaths, one related to reeintervention, 2 strokes and one MI nonprocedure associated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Carotid hematoma is a devastating and relatively common complication in our institution although the incidence of major hematoma is reduced. The main factors associated with reeintervention were previous double anti-platelet therapy, non-patch surgical techniques and patient neurological instability (shunt use), probably associated with less accurate hemostasis. Global bleeding is related to the use of clopidogrel 24<!--> <!-->h before, and as post-operative factors poor tensional control (high)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30341,"journal":{"name":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 12-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancv.2015.12.008","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1646706X15001421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of neck bleeding, requiring or not surgical intervention, after carotid endarterectomy (CE) and to identify its predictive parameters and its influence in stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 200 CEs carried out in 194 patients between 2010 and 2014 in our institution. The endpoints were: postoperative major cervical bleeding MB (that required reintervention) and global cervical bleeding GB (registered neck bleeding) as also its major post reintervention complications. Patient demographics, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy (pre, intra and postoperative), anesthetic data, surgical technique, and perioperative management data were collected. Univariate analysis with Pearson chi-Squared or Fisher Test was applied for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables.

Results

Neck bleeding after CE occurred in 25 cases (12%), requiring reoperation in 8 cases (4.0%). Univariate analysis (Pearson chi-squared test) showed significance (p < 0.05) for global hematoma in which concerns clopidogrel use until surgery (p = 0.04), elevated mean arterial pressure during hospitalar stay (p = 0.006). For major hematoma it has significance previous dual antiplatelet therapy (p = 0.039), patch use compared to other techniques (p = 0.017), and neurological repercurssion after clamping (p = 0.03). Individual analysis of surgical technique did not show significant value for major or global hematoma. There were to 2 deaths, one related to reeintervention, 2 strokes and one MI nonprocedure associated.

Conclusions

Carotid hematoma is a devastating and relatively common complication in our institution although the incidence of major hematoma is reduced. The main factors associated with reeintervention were previous double anti-platelet therapy, non-patch surgical techniques and patient neurological instability (shunt use), probably associated with less accurate hemostasis. Global bleeding is related to the use of clopidogrel 24 h before, and as post-operative factors poor tensional control (high)

颈动脉内膜切除术后颈部出血的预测因素:5年修订
本研究的目的是确定颈动脉内膜切除术(CE)后需要或不需要手术干预的颈部出血的发生率,并确定其预测参数及其对卒中、心肌梗死(MI)和死亡率的影响。方法回顾性分析2010 - 2014年我院194例患者的200例ce。终点为:术后主要宫颈出血MB(需要再干预)和整体宫颈出血GB(登记颈部出血)及其主要再干预后并发症。收集患者人口统计数据、抗血小板和抗凝治疗(术前、术中和术后)、麻醉数据、手术技术和围手术期管理数据。分类变量采用单因素分析Pearson chi-Squared或Fisher检验,连续变量采用t检验。结果CE术后发生颈部出血25例(12%),需再次手术8例(4.0%)。单因素分析(Pearson卡方检验)显示显著性(p <在手术前使用氯吡格雷的血肿中(p = 0.04),住院期间平均动脉压升高(p = 0.006)。对于严重血肿,既往双重抗血小板治疗(p = 0.039)、贴片使用与其他技术相比(p = 0.017)、夹持后神经系统复发(p = 0.03)具有重要意义。手术技术的个体分析对主要或全身性血肿没有显着的价值。有2例死亡,1例与再干预有关,2例中风和1例与非手术相关的心肌梗死。结论颈动脉血肿是本院常见的严重并发症,但大出血发生率有所降低。与再干预相关的主要因素是既往双重抗血小板治疗,非贴片手术技术和患者神经不稳定(分流术),可能与不准确的止血有关。全身出血与术前24小时使用氯吡格雷有关,术后张力控制不良(高)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信