Is there a survival difference between single station and multi-station N2 disease in operated non-small cell lung cancer patients?

Tevfik Ilker Akcam, Seyda Ors Kaya, Onur Akcay, Ozgur Samancılar, Kenan Can Ceylan, Serpil Sevınc, Saban Unsal
{"title":"Is there a survival difference between single station and multi-station N2 disease in operated non-small cell lung cancer patients?","authors":"Tevfik Ilker Akcam,&nbsp;Seyda Ors Kaya,&nbsp;Onur Akcay,&nbsp;Ozgur Samancılar,&nbsp;Kenan Can Ceylan,&nbsp;Serpil Sevınc,&nbsp;Saban Unsal","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrc.2015.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Microabstract</h3><p>Study investigated if there was a survival difference between sinN2 and mulN2 disease in operated NSCLC patients. 73 patients had sinN2 and 38 patients had mulN2 disease. The median survival and the 5-year survival rate of sinN2 and mulN2 were 26 months and 20.5% against 20 months and 0%, respectively, and there was a statistically significant difference between two groups (0.032).</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>The most important parameter determining the treatment and survival in non-small cell lung cancer is the stage of the disease and the associated lymph node involvement. The present study investigated if there was a survival difference between single-station N2 (sinN2-Group 1) and multi-station N2 (mulN2-Group 2) disease in operated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The patients, who were diagnosed with NSCLC and underwent anatomic resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection and found to have ipsilateral lymph node metastasis between January 2005 and December 2011 in our clinic, were investigated retrospectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>801 patients had anatomic resection. Among these patients, a total of 111 patients (13.8%) were found pathological N2 (+). 73 (66.6%) patients had sinN2 and 38 (33.4%) patients had mulN2 disease. Out of these patients, 94 (85.4%) were male and 17 (14.6%) were female, and the mean age was 58.9±10.2 (35–82) years. The median survival and the 5-year survival rate of sinN2 and mulN2 were 26 months and 20.5% against 20 months and 0%, respectively, and there was a statistically significant difference between two groups (0.032).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TNM system used in the current lung cancer staging assesses only the localizations of the metastatic lymph node stations. However, it seems that the localization of the lymph node stations alone is not completely enough for an estimated survival. The present study has found poorer survival in the multi-station N2 patients than the single-station N2 patients, which is also statistically significant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90461,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrc.2015.09.007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213089615300190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Microabstract

Study investigated if there was a survival difference between sinN2 and mulN2 disease in operated NSCLC patients. 73 patients had sinN2 and 38 patients had mulN2 disease. The median survival and the 5-year survival rate of sinN2 and mulN2 were 26 months and 20.5% against 20 months and 0%, respectively, and there was a statistically significant difference between two groups (0.032).

Background

The most important parameter determining the treatment and survival in non-small cell lung cancer is the stage of the disease and the associated lymph node involvement. The present study investigated if there was a survival difference between single-station N2 (sinN2-Group 1) and multi-station N2 (mulN2-Group 2) disease in operated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Materials and methods

The patients, who were diagnosed with NSCLC and underwent anatomic resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection and found to have ipsilateral lymph node metastasis between January 2005 and December 2011 in our clinic, were investigated retrospectively.

Results

801 patients had anatomic resection. Among these patients, a total of 111 patients (13.8%) were found pathological N2 (+). 73 (66.6%) patients had sinN2 and 38 (33.4%) patients had mulN2 disease. Out of these patients, 94 (85.4%) were male and 17 (14.6%) were female, and the mean age was 58.9±10.2 (35–82) years. The median survival and the 5-year survival rate of sinN2 and mulN2 were 26 months and 20.5% against 20 months and 0%, respectively, and there was a statistically significant difference between two groups (0.032).

Conclusions

TNM system used in the current lung cancer staging assesses only the localizations of the metastatic lymph node stations. However, it seems that the localization of the lymph node stations alone is not completely enough for an estimated survival. The present study has found poorer survival in the multi-station N2 patients than the single-station N2 patients, which is also statistically significant.

手术后非小细胞肺癌患者单站N2与多站N2是否存在生存差异?
显微研究探讨了手术后NSCLC患者sinN2和mulN2是否存在生存差异。73例有sinN2, 38例有mulN2。sinN2、mulN2的中位生存期和5年生存率分别为26个月、20.5%和20个月、0%,两组间差异有统计学意义(0.032)。背景:决定非小细胞肺癌治疗和生存的最重要参数是疾病的分期和相关的淋巴结受累。本研究探讨手术后非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者单站N2 (sinn2 - 1组)与多站N2 (muln2 - 2组)是否存在生存差异。材料与方法回顾性分析我院2005年1月至2011年12月诊断为非小细胞肺癌,行解剖切除及纵隔淋巴结清扫术,发现同侧淋巴结转移的患者。结果801例患者行解剖切除。其中111例(13.8%)发现病理N2(+)。73例(66.6%)有sinN2, 38例(33.4%)有mulN2。其中男性94例(85.4%),女性17例(14.6%),平均年龄58.9±10.2(35-82)岁。sinN2、mulN2的中位生存期和5年生存率分别为26个月、20.5%和20个月、0%,两组间差异有统计学意义(0.032)。结论目前用于肺癌分期的stnm系统仅评估转移淋巴结的定位。然而,似乎仅仅定位淋巴结站是不足以估计生存的。本研究发现多站N2患者的生存期较单站N2患者差,具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信