The influence of own and other outcome on satisfaction and choice of task difficulty

Ewart A.C. Thomas, Wanda E. Ward
{"title":"The influence of own and other outcome on satisfaction and choice of task difficulty","authors":"Ewart A.C. Thomas,&nbsp;Wanda E. Ward","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90157-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hypotheses are stated about the relationships among the level of task difficulty chosen by a subject in a sequential task, expectancy of success, own outcome and that of a paired subject, and satisfaction with own outcome. Multiple regression analyses were used to test these hypotheses on data from an experiment in which subjects worked in pairs for six trials. It was found that the difficulty level chosen on a given trial was predicted by the difficulty level, the subject's outcome score, and the subject's satisfaction on the <em>previous</em> trial; that level of satisfaction on a trial was predicted by the subject's own outcome score and the difference in outcome scores between the two subjects on that trial; and that expectancy was predicted by difficulty level on the same trial. These results underscore the important mediating role of outcome evaluation in the control of behavior, and are consistent with previous research showing a dependence of evaluation on social comparison processes. Also consistent with previous research is the observed trend over trials to more difficult tasks. The “slope” of this trend depended on the initial difficulty level, a result which is readily accounted for by a simplified version of our hypotheses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 399-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90157-5","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational behavior and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507383901575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Hypotheses are stated about the relationships among the level of task difficulty chosen by a subject in a sequential task, expectancy of success, own outcome and that of a paired subject, and satisfaction with own outcome. Multiple regression analyses were used to test these hypotheses on data from an experiment in which subjects worked in pairs for six trials. It was found that the difficulty level chosen on a given trial was predicted by the difficulty level, the subject's outcome score, and the subject's satisfaction on the previous trial; that level of satisfaction on a trial was predicted by the subject's own outcome score and the difference in outcome scores between the two subjects on that trial; and that expectancy was predicted by difficulty level on the same trial. These results underscore the important mediating role of outcome evaluation in the control of behavior, and are consistent with previous research showing a dependence of evaluation on social comparison processes. Also consistent with previous research is the observed trend over trials to more difficult tasks. The “slope” of this trend depended on the initial difficulty level, a result which is readily accounted for by a simplified version of our hypotheses.

自己和他人的结果对任务难度满意度和选择的影响
假设被试在连续任务中选择的任务难度水平与成功预期、自己和配对被试的结果以及对自己结果的满意度之间的关系。我们使用多元回归分析来检验这些假设,这些数据来自一个实验,在这个实验中,受试者在六个试验中成对工作。研究发现,在给定的试验中选择的难度水平是由难度水平、受试者的结果得分和受试者对前一次试验的满意度来预测的;试验中的满意度水平由受试者自己的结果得分和该试验中两个受试者之间结果得分的差异来预测;这个预期是通过同一试验的难度来预测的。这些结果强调了结果评价在行为控制中的重要中介作用,并与先前的研究结果一致,表明评价依赖于社会比较过程。与之前的研究相一致的是,观察到的试验倾向于更困难的任务。这一趋势的“斜率”取决于最初的难度水平,这一结果很容易用我们假设的简化版本来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书