A biocultural analysis of revolution

Penny Anthon Green
{"title":"A biocultural analysis of revolution","authors":"Penny Anthon Green","doi":"10.1016/0140-1750(91)90015-I","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When analyzed from the vantage point of modern evolutionary theory, sociopolitical revolutions may be viewed as complex behavioral expressions of the competition inherent in natural selection. They involve behavior by challengers that aims toward displacing those who enjoy first access to available power and resources. Revolutions also reveal rulers defending their advantages. The analysis unfolds in three stages: (a) sociopolitical revolutions explained, at least partially, in terms of the logic of natural selection; (b) identification of some “strategies” utilized by both challengers and incumbents in competition for the political apex—these strategies may be thought of as ultimately resulting from evolved behavioral predispositions whose strength, and therefore degree of phenotypical expression, is dependent upon sociocultural influences (changes in the intensity of such predispositions result in challengers and incumbents respectively pursuing strategies that end in the replacement of one ruling group by another); (c) reexamination of some contributions that social scientists have made to our understanding of revolutions. The objective is explication of the relationship between behavioral predispositions and sociocultural variables that have been identified as co-determinants of these political upheavals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81696,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social and biological structures","volume":"14 4","pages":"Pages 435-454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0140-1750(91)90015-I","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social and biological structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014017509190015I","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

When analyzed from the vantage point of modern evolutionary theory, sociopolitical revolutions may be viewed as complex behavioral expressions of the competition inherent in natural selection. They involve behavior by challengers that aims toward displacing those who enjoy first access to available power and resources. Revolutions also reveal rulers defending their advantages. The analysis unfolds in three stages: (a) sociopolitical revolutions explained, at least partially, in terms of the logic of natural selection; (b) identification of some “strategies” utilized by both challengers and incumbents in competition for the political apex—these strategies may be thought of as ultimately resulting from evolved behavioral predispositions whose strength, and therefore degree of phenotypical expression, is dependent upon sociocultural influences (changes in the intensity of such predispositions result in challengers and incumbents respectively pursuing strategies that end in the replacement of one ruling group by another); (c) reexamination of some contributions that social scientists have made to our understanding of revolutions. The objective is explication of the relationship between behavioral predispositions and sociocultural variables that have been identified as co-determinants of these political upheavals.

革命的生物文化分析
从现代进化理论的角度分析,社会政治革命可以被看作是自然选择中固有竞争的复杂行为表现。它们涉及挑战者的行为,旨在取代那些最先获得可用权力和资源的人。革命还揭示了统治者捍卫自己的优势。分析分三个阶段展开:(a)社会政治革命至少部分地用自然选择的逻辑来解释;(b)识别挑战者和在位者在政治巅峰竞争中使用的一些“策略”——这些策略可能被认为是进化的行为倾向的最终结果,其强度,因此表型表达的程度,依赖于社会文化影响(这种倾向强度的变化导致挑战者和在位者各自采取的战略以一个统治集团被另一个统治集团取代而告终);(c)重新审视社会科学家对我们理解革命所作的贡献。目的是解释行为倾向和社会文化变量之间的关系,这些变量已被确定为这些政治动荡的共同决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信