Privacy Rights, and Why Negative Control is Not a Dead End: A Reply to Munch and Lundgren

IF 0.9 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-07-28 DOI:10.1007/s11158-021-09524-1

J. Mainz, Rasmus Uhrenfeldt

引用次数: 2

查看原文本刊更多论文

隐私权，以及为什么消极控制不是死胡同:对Munch和Lundgren的回复

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Res Publica: a Journal of Legal, Moral and Social Philosophy is an interdisciplinary publication concerned with the philosophical analysis of moral, political, social and legal issues. It provides a forum for discussion of theoretical issues; a public arena for voicing matters of practical concern; and a vehicle for addressing questions of morality, politics, law and society, the interconnections between them and, more generally, the relation of theory to practice. The journal seeks to publish articles and review essays which are both philosophically rigorous and accessible to a wide range of academics and professionals. Replies to articles are welcome. It is the policy of Res Publica to encourage publication by researchers at the beginning of their careers as well as by established scholars; and by those in non-Western countries.