1.5410.6-μm eyesafe laser rangefinders performance under adverse weather conditions

V. Larochelle, D. Hutt , D. Bonnier, J.-M. Thériault
{"title":"1.5410.6-μm eyesafe laser rangefinders performance under adverse weather conditions","authors":"V. Larochelle,&nbsp;D. Hutt ,&nbsp;D. Bonnier,&nbsp;J.-M. Thériault","doi":"10.1016/0020-0891(93)90074-H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this investigation, the performance of a CO<sub>2</sub> laser rangefinder at 10.6 μm and an erbium:glass rangefinder at 1.54 μm are evaluated and compared under various atmospheric conditions. Both systems and the trial site are described. The effect of atmospheric extinction and scattering is discussed. Also, the maximum range capability of the two laser rangefinders under these degraded weather conditions is assessed. The results show that the tested CO<sub>2</sub> laser rangefinder performed better than the Er:glass LRF used for the trials under all weather conditions. However, comparing two state-of-the-art systems does not lead necessarily to the same conclusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81524,"journal":{"name":"Infrared physics","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 421-439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0020-0891(93)90074-H","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrared physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002008919390074H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this investigation, the performance of a CO2 laser rangefinder at 10.6 μm and an erbium:glass rangefinder at 1.54 μm are evaluated and compared under various atmospheric conditions. Both systems and the trial site are described. The effect of atmospheric extinction and scattering is discussed. Also, the maximum range capability of the two laser rangefinders under these degraded weather conditions is assessed. The results show that the tested CO2 laser rangefinder performed better than the Er:glass LRF used for the trials under all weather conditions. However, comparing two state-of-the-art systems does not lead necessarily to the same conclusion.

1.5410.6 μm激光测距仪在恶劣天气条件下的安全性能
本文对10.6 μm CO2激光测距仪和1.54 μm铒玻璃测距仪在不同大气条件下的性能进行了评价和比较。介绍了两种系统和试验场地。讨论了大气消光和散射的影响。同时,对这两种激光测距仪在恶劣天气条件下的最大测距能力进行了评估。结果表明,在各种天气条件下,CO2激光测距仪的性能都优于试验用的Er:玻璃LRF。然而,比较两种最先进的系统并不一定会得出相同的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信