Comparison of a deconvolution technique for measuring mesospheric winds with the spaced antenna technique

D.M Lingard
{"title":"Comparison of a deconvolution technique for measuring mesospheric winds with the spaced antenna technique","authors":"D.M Lingard","doi":"10.1016/0021-9169(95)00151-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two techniques of mesospheric wind velocity measurement are compared. One is the spaced antenna technique and the other is a technique described in this paper which deconvolves radar data in order to determine the positions and Doppler shifts of D-region scatterers. Both techniques were employed in the height interval 70–96 km using the Bribie Island radar (152°E, 27°S) operating at 1.98 MHz. A median discrepancy of 15 m/s between the two sets of wind measurements was observed. This was reduced to about 7 m/s when both techniques were forced to use the same echo information when performing a wind velocity measurement. In performing a measurement, the deconvolution technique has the advantage of being able to use the echo information within a height interval whereas the spaced antenna technique uses echo information within a range interval. However the deconvolution technique has disadvantages including much greater computer time requirements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics","volume":"58 11","pages":"Pages 1211-1218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9169(95)00151-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021916995001514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Two techniques of mesospheric wind velocity measurement are compared. One is the spaced antenna technique and the other is a technique described in this paper which deconvolves radar data in order to determine the positions and Doppler shifts of D-region scatterers. Both techniques were employed in the height interval 70–96 km using the Bribie Island radar (152°E, 27°S) operating at 1.98 MHz. A median discrepancy of 15 m/s between the two sets of wind measurements was observed. This was reduced to about 7 m/s when both techniques were forced to use the same echo information when performing a wind velocity measurement. In performing a measurement, the deconvolution technique has the advantage of being able to use the echo information within a height interval whereas the spaced antenna technique uses echo information within a range interval. However the deconvolution technique has disadvantages including much greater computer time requirements.

测量中间层风的反褶积技术与间隔天线技术的比较
比较了两种测量中间层风速的方法。一种是间隔天线技术,另一种是本文描述的对雷达数据进行反卷积以确定d区散射体的位置和多普勒频移的技术。这两种技术都在70-96 km高度区间使用Bribie岛雷达(152°E, 27°S),工作频率为1.98 MHz。观察到两组风测量值之间的中位数差异为15 m/s。当两种技术在进行风速测量时被迫使用相同的回波信息时,这一速度降至约7米/秒。在进行测量时,反褶积技术的优点是能够使用高度间隔内的回波信息,而间隔天线技术使用距离间隔内的回波信息。然而,反褶积技术有缺点,包括更大的计算机时间要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信