[Health and study load among students: a cross-sectional health study at the University of Kassel].

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alfons Hollederer
{"title":"[Health and study load among students: a cross-sectional health study at the University of Kassel].","authors":"Alfons Hollederer","doi":"10.1007/s11553-023-01035-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Relatively little is known about students' health and illness. Their effects on academic success have hardly been researched. The aim of the study is to examine associations between health status and study load completed among students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 23,699 students enrolled at the University of Kassel, 3330 participated in the voluntary survey (computer-assisted web interviews) in March 2022. The response rate was 14.1% under conditions of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 80.5% of students rated their general health status as very good or good. There were significant differences between men and women in terms of general health status (84.4% vs. 78.6%) and the global activity limitation indicator (GALI). Women were more often than men severely limited in usual activities due to health problems (3.2% vs. 2.6%) or limited but not severely (9.6% vs. 5.7%) for at least the past 6 months. Reported prevalence rates of mental illness were striking. They were higher in women than in men (25.3% vs. 15.4%). Furthermore, 15.1% of students reported that their study load completed was \"much less\" than required by the study regulations of current degree programs. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that students who were limited in activities of daily life because of a health problem had a significantly increased odds ratio of 1.56 (95%-confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.27) for a much lower study load, and those students who were severely limited had a significantly increased odds ratio of 2.81 (95%-CI 1.64-4.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified strong associations between health and study load. It points out the need not only for more health promotion but also for health management for students with disabilities and limitations due to health problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":44917,"journal":{"name":"Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-023-01035-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Relatively little is known about students' health and illness. Their effects on academic success have hardly been researched. The aim of the study is to examine associations between health status and study load completed among students.

Methods: Of 23,699 students enrolled at the University of Kassel, 3330 participated in the voluntary survey (computer-assisted web interviews) in March 2022. The response rate was 14.1% under conditions of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Results: In all, 80.5% of students rated their general health status as very good or good. There were significant differences between men and women in terms of general health status (84.4% vs. 78.6%) and the global activity limitation indicator (GALI). Women were more often than men severely limited in usual activities due to health problems (3.2% vs. 2.6%) or limited but not severely (9.6% vs. 5.7%) for at least the past 6 months. Reported prevalence rates of mental illness were striking. They were higher in women than in men (25.3% vs. 15.4%). Furthermore, 15.1% of students reported that their study load completed was "much less" than required by the study regulations of current degree programs. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that students who were limited in activities of daily life because of a health problem had a significantly increased odds ratio of 1.56 (95%-confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.27) for a much lower study load, and those students who were severely limited had a significantly increased odds ratio of 2.81 (95%-CI 1.64-4.80).

Conclusion: The study identified strong associations between health and study load. It points out the need not only for more health promotion but also for health management for students with disabilities and limitations due to health problems.

[学生健康与学习负荷:卡塞尔大学的一项横断面健康研究]。
引言:相对而言,我们对学生的健康和疾病知之甚少。他们对学业成功的影响几乎没有研究。本研究旨在探讨学生健康状况与学习负荷之间的关系。方法:在卡塞尔大学23,699名在校生中,3330人于2022年3月参加了自愿调查(计算机辅助网络访谈)。在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行条件下,应答率为14.1%。结果:80.5%的学生对自己的总体健康状况评价为“非常好”或“良好”。男性和女性在一般健康状况(84.4%对78.6%)和全球活动限制指标(GALI)方面存在显著差异。至少在过去6个月里,由于健康问题,女性比男性更经常在日常活动中受到严重限制(3.2%对2.6%)或受到限制但不严重(9.6%对5.7%)。据报道,精神疾病的流行率惊人。女性高于男性(25.3%比15.4%)。此外,15.1%的学生报告说,他们完成的学习工作量“远远少于”当前学位课程的学习规定。多因素logistic回归分析显示,由于健康问题而限制日常生活活动的学生在较低的学习负荷下的优势比显著增加,为1.56(95%可信区间[CI] 1.07-2.27),而那些受到严重限制的学生的优势比显著增加,为2.81(95%可信区间[CI] 1.64-4.80)。结论:该研究确定了健康与学习负荷之间的密切联系。它指出,不仅需要更多的健康促进,而且需要对残疾和由于健康问题而受到限制的学生进行健康管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung
Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Deutschland ist eine wirtschaftliche Hochleistungsgesellschaft, die viel für Reparatur und Kompensation gesundheitlicher Probleme ausgibt und wenig für ihre Verhütung. Prävention + Gesundheitsförderung ist das Organ für die Publikation von wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten über präventive Maßnahmen in folgenden gesellschaftlichen Bereichen:in Kindergärten und Schulen,in Unternehmen, Dienstleistungseinrichtungen und Verwaltungen,in Verbänden der Arbeitgeber und Gewerkschaften,im Staat mit seinen unterschiedlichen Gebietskörperschaften,bei den Trägern der sozialen Sicherung,im gesamten Gesundheitswesen mit allen seinen Einrichtungen,in Bildung und Wissenschaft.Hierbei werden die Arbeiten in vier Themengebiete mit den folgenden Kernaussagen unterteilt:Wissen schaffen für Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung Investition in Gesundheit statt Kuration und Kompensation Mehr Selbstverantwortung für Beschäftigte und Träger Innovatives Gesundheitsmanagement statt vorzeitiger Kuration bzw. Frühberentung Prävention + Gesundheitsförderung hat das Ziel, mit hochwertigen Arbeiten auch dazu beizutragen, dass Einrichtungen, die nachweisbar die Gesundheit der ihnen angehörenden Menschen fördern, dafür belohnt werden, diejenigen, die vermeidbare soziale Kosten erzeugen, entsprechend belastet werden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信