State of the art: Chronic kidney disease education

Stephen Z. Fadem MD
{"title":"State of the art: Chronic kidney disease education","authors":"Stephen Z. Fadem MD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It has been established for many years that early kidney disease education can play a key role in shaping outcomes of dialysis patients. A 1993 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Panel suggested that early referral to a renal team could reduce mortality, psychologically prepare the patient, and reduce a catastrophic onset of dialysis.<span>1</span> Since that time, the field of nephrology has become more organized through the establishment of a classification system for what is now formally referred to as chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, guidelines have been developed to help promote early disease awareness, and clinical performance measures have been refined.<span>2</span>, <span>3</span></p><p>However, our outcomes are still disappointing. The most recent U.S. Renal Data System (USRDS) database reveals that only 24.5% of incident patients have seen a nephrologist for more than 12 months prior to starting dialysis, and that only approximately 40% of patients ever see a nephrologist at all before starting care for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This translates to a burdensome and often challenging dialysis start, a decreased opportunity for a positive outcome, and an overall spike in healthcare costs as patients transition into ESRD care. What is most daunting is that among those who have never seen a nephrologist, 89% start dialysis with a central venous catheter. However, even among those patients who have seen nephrologists within a 12-month period preceding dialysis, 55% begin care with a catheter.<span>4</span></p><p>Meanwhile, patients who have been followed by the nephrologist for a median of two years demonstrate limited knowledge of their disease.<span>5</span> A survey of dialysis patients undertaken by the American Association of Kidney Patients (AAKP) demonstrated that patients receive a lack of uniform, thorough information about possible treatment methods; 31% of respondents said that treatment options were not well represented, and that they were only moderately satisfied with their pre-treatment education.<span>6</span></p><p>Sensing the need for legislative action, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA),<span>7</span> Section 152(b), added kidney disease patient education services as a covered benefit for Medicare beneficiaries with stage 4 CKD. The rule for kidney disease education services was published in November, 2009 and became effective on January 1, 2010.<span>8</span> Physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners are eligible providers, and dialysis facilities are excluded. The rule specifies the content. It was specifically designed to provide patients with comprehensive information to help prolong or delay the need for dialysis, manage comorbidities, prevent uremic complications, and help patients participate in an informed decision-making process regarding their options for care.</p><p>Qualified persons providing kidney disease education services must also develop outcomes assessments to measure the patients' knowledge about their disease and its treatment. These assessments are intended to improve the effectiveness of preparing patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare options related to CKD and to meet the communication needs of underserved populations, including persons with disabilities, limited English proficiency, and health literacy needs.</p><p>The coupling of MIPPA 2008 incentives with the implementation of accountable care organizations (see proposed rules)<span>8</span> can drive performance-based healthcare and collaboration between primary care physicians and nephrologists. This can increase emphasis on proactive intervention during the earlier stages of kidney disease. The renal community is availing itself of opportunities to improve patient outcomes, take advantages of incentives, and adapt early to changes in the healthcare delivery system. This article reviews efforts by a cross section of groups that have demonstrated forward thinking and a need to meet the challenges described above.</p><p>Through a rigorous scientific process, the RPA developed the Advanced CKD Patient Management Toolkit in 2004 (www.renalmd.org/RPA-Advanced-CKD-Patient-Management-Toolkit) to assist practitioners in implementing the recommendations included in RPA's third evidence-based clinical practice guideline, Appropriate Patient Preparation for Renal Therapy.<span>9</span> The toolkit is organized into four main areas (assess, tailor, implement and evaluate) and- includes 16 categories and sets of tools for healthcare providers and kidney patients. In 2005, with technical support from the Duke Center for Clinical Health Policy Research (CCHPR), the RPA studied the use of the toolkit in two diverse nephrology practices in North Carolina over a six-month period. The toolkit was modified and re-released for dissemination to nephrology practitioners in 2006. In 2008, the RPA, in conjunction with Duke CCHPR, launched a ten-site field test of the CKD toolkit in nephrology practices around the country to determine the critical success factors for improving outcomes of patients with advanced CKD through processes delineated in the toolkit. The field test concluded in 2010, and the study results are being submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p><p>In addition, the RPA has modified a selected subset of the tools to assist primary care providers with identifying and co-managing advanced CKD patients. To test the usability and feasibility of these tools, RPA conducted an 18-month pilot study at two nephrology practices and their referring primary care practices in Chicago and Philadelphia. During the Improved Identification and Co-Management of Advanced CKD Patients pilot project that began in late 2009, the following tools were tested: CKD Screening Protocol and Recommendation on When to Refer to Nephrologist, CKD Identification and Action Plan Tool, Referring Clinician Fax Back Form, CKD Post-Consult Letter, Concise Practice Guidelines, CKD Chart Flags, and CKD Patient Diary. The RPA plans to apply the lessons learned from this project to nephrology practices across the country. The pilot test concluded in March 2011 and the results and recommendations will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p><p>The portal contains links to relevant parties, as well as to work the RPA has done on the matter, such as submitting comments or producing a position paper. The RPA is currently working with the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI) of the American Medical Association to develop additional CKD and ESRD measures.</p><p>Additionally, the RPA developed a series of tools regarding the kidney disease education benefit, including FAQs, a documentation tool, and a practice assessment tool intended to assist nephrology practitioners in determining the economic viability of providing the kidney disease education services.</p><p>The AAKP (www.aakp.org) is developing a renal e-health literacy program, the purpose of which is to identify and compare health literacy knowledge and practices among patients through e-health literacy activities. It is drawing on its vast experience with patient education in a collaborative effort involving patients and professionals alike, and is involving its patient base to identify, implement, and then evaluate successful research strategies that will improve health literacy outcomes.</p><p>Through the implementation of a web-based platform, the AAKP will address the following specific aims:</p><p>The proposed renal e-health literacy program is an innovation that moves beyond conventional static healthcare information, and represents the transition from printed-paper brochures to dynamic web-based information. Given that an increasing segment of the U.S. adult population is seeking and retrieving health information online, the program provides a timely shift for meeting patients where they are searching and interacting.</p><p>In addition to patients' ability to quickly retrieve information, renal e-health literacy materials can also be updated and tracked for their use and utility. The e-health literacy presentations developed for this program will be designed using rich, interactive, and state-of-the art Internet-based tools to engage learners in active and passive learning sessions and will appeal to diverse learner types (auditory, kinesthetic, and visual).</p><p>The AAKP is creating patient-physician education tools to improve patients' understanding of CKD, the importance of screening, their role in the treatment planning process, and adherence/compliance obstacles that they are likely to encounter. These tools will equip the care team and patients with practical strategies to overcome barriers to care.</p><p>In April 2011, the Medical Education Institute (MEI) launched a new toolkit for CKD education called, <i>How to Have a Good Future with Kidney Disease</i> (www.lifeoptions.org/goodfuture). Six decks of full-color slides (mainly pictures, with as few words as possible) cover <i>Coming to Terms</i>, <i>Kidneys and Kidney Disease</i>, <i>Slowing Kidney Disease</i>, <i>Transplant, Dialysis and Your Lifestyle</i>, and <i>Your Money and Your Life</i> to help patients to become active partners in self-management of their CKD. Each deck includes slides, speaker's script, learning objectives, a quiz, and PDF handouts for patients. The decks can be used one-on-one or for groups, for stages 3 CKD through end stage. A “Read Me First” document explains the kit, offers presentation tips, matches decks to CKD stages, offers a MIPPA CKD education benefit summary, and provides learning objectives, quiz answers, and credentials/affiliations of the multidisciplinary reviewers. The slide content is consistent with the MIPPA benefit. No outside funding supported development of this slide series.</p><p>Also in April 2011, MEI premiered the first multimedia video in a new <i>Let's Talk About It</i> series, called <i>Let's Talk About Fistulas (</i>www.lifeoptions.org/letstalk<i>)</i>. Supported by grants from Fistula First, Amgen, and Genzyme, the three-minute video in English and Spanish focuses on why it is a good idea to get rid of a hemodialysis catheter and get a fistula or graft instead. Graphics and animations are used to explain the types of access, risks of infection, and benefits of fistulas. The primary audience is patients who are currently on dialysis using a catheter, with a secondary audience of CKD patients in doctor's offices or clinics—to encourage early fistula placement.</p><p>MEI's Kidney School (www.kidneyschool.org) and Home Dialysis Central (www.homedialysis.org) sites have both been recently completely revised and updated, with new looks and simplified navigation. Kidney School is sponsored by an exclusive, unrestricted educational grant from Fresenius Medical Care North America, and content is independent of and not influenced by its corporate sponsor. Home Dialysis Central helps patients and professionals learn about peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis, with information about how these options work, where to find them, what the equipment looks like, online and phone support, message boards, and much more. The site is sponsored by the AAKP, Fresenius Medical Care, <i>Nephrology News &amp; Issues</i>, NxStage, Amgen, Baxter, DaVita, Satellite WellBound, Dialysis Cost Containment, Inc., DCI, ESRD Networks 8 and 13, Liberty, Multimed, Northwest Kidney Centers, Renal Advantage, and this journal, <i>Dialysis &amp; Transplantation</i>. The National Nephrologist Dialysis Study, done in 2010 under the Home Dialysis Central umbrella, was presented at the American Society of Nephrology meeting in November, and a manuscript is in development.</p><p>The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) has created a model for CKD education, Your Treatment, Your Choice. In addition they have developed a continuing medical education/continuing nursing education (CME/CNE) webcast presentation and a post-test (www.kidney.org/cme). The objectives of this webcast are to discuss CKD in terms of cognitive, psychosocial, ethnic, cultural, and age-related challenges in order to identify and overcome barriers to informed choice by patients. The webcast presentation also explains the MIPPA act, discusses key precepts to adult learning, and appraises the NKF's Your Treatment, Your Choice patient education program</p><p>An example of a regional (state) initiative to improve kidney disease awareness is The Texas Campaign for Kidney Health (http://kidneyhealth.tmf.org). This is an alliance of organizations and agencies involved in prevention, education, and clinical consultation for CKD. These organizations include the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), the Texas Medical Foundation (TMF) Health Quality Institute, the End Stage Renal Disease Network of Texas, the Texas Renal Coalition, and the National Kidney Foundation. This collaboration is serving as a foundation for statewide improvement and system change at the community level, participating in activities to increase screening for nephropathy, promote disease prevention and management of CKD, and provide timely and comprehensive counseling on renal replacement therapy options.</p><p>The network promotes patient engagement and the improvement of clinical processes in the treatment of CKD. <i>Love Your Kidneys</i> and its dual program component, <i>Save Their Kidneys</i> (http://savekidneys.com), provide the theme and messaging for collaborative education and outreach activities. In 2009, for example, campaign partners teamed up to develop the <i>Diabetes Educators Lesson Plan—Save Their Kidneys!</i> for use by health educators to demonstrate the close relationship between diabetes and CKD. The program included a lesson plan, a kidney quiz to be used for pre- and post-test comparisons, fact sheets on diabetes and kidney disease, and instructions for a hands-on patient activity demonstrating the effects of diabetes on kidney function, and how to detect early damage. The lesson plan was designed to be used along with the Diabetes Empowerment Education Program (DEEP), currently in use and promoted by Texas Diabetes Program regional Community Diabetes Projects in several regions across the state.</p><p>A faith-based toolkit for use in congregations was also developed in 2009. As an influential voice in the community, the clergy has an opportunity to educate the congregants about good healthcare and preventive measures that can change unhealthy lifestyle patterns. The toolkit provides lesson plans, educational materials on diabetes and kidney disease, and important health messages urging at-risk congregants to get tested for kidney disease. The faith-based toolkit and the diabetes educator lesson plans are two among many resources developed and used statewide under the Texas Campaign for Kidney Health to increase awareness of CKD, its risk factors, and the importance of early detection. This campaign works in concert with the Governor's appointed Chronic Kidney Disease Task Force.<span>10</span></p><p>Under the umbrella of the Texas Campaign for Kidney Health, the TMF Health Quality Institute (the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Texas) works directly with physicians and patient advocacy groups to prevent and slow the progression of kidney disease. Currently more than 160 participating physicians (including primary care and nephrologists) statewide receive direct technical assistance from Quality Improvement Consultants to identify high-risk patients, as well as clinical evidence-based strategies to monitor, treat, and slow the progression of the disease. These practices receive direct consultation on implementation of the KDOQI clinical practice guidelines, data analysis, work-flow analysis, and development of flowcharts and/or reminders, as well as coaching on effective strategies to promote patient engagement, including patient education resources from partners including the National Kidney Disease Education Program, the NKF, the American Kidney Fund, the AAKP, and the MEI.</p><p>Additionally, the TMF Health Quality Institute works with other engaged providers including primary care physicians, nephrologists, surgeons, vascular access centers, hospitals, and dialysis centers statewide. Assistance is provided to these engaged providers through a number of avenues, including direct technical assistance, large-scale learning strategies, roundtable meetings, and discussions, as well as focused CME/CNE educative events. One example of an intervention that has been developed is a Nephrology Audit Tool, which was designed to help nephrologists identify opportunities within their practices for improvement in process to promote comprehensive and timely renal replacement therapy options for patients electing hemodialysis. A report is provided to the nephrologists identifying areas for improvement, with options to implement tools developed to address identified opportunities.</p><p>Focusing on the Rio Grande Valley, the TMF utilized a medical community approach bringing together primary care physicians, nephrologists, surgeons, hospital leaders and staff, outpatient dialysis staff, and educators. A roundtable discussion identified the need for increased vein preservation activities, which led to process changes including automating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reporting in the laboratory information system, avoiding/reducing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines in patients with a decreased eGFR, and coaching providers on improved patient education strategies for chronic kidney disease patients.</p><p>Concurrent with physician assistance is a campaign to educate patients with diabetes on disease management and the importance of screening for CKD. Community education and outreach activities are conducted for patients at risk for CKD as well as their families and caregivers. This statewide initiative utilizes partnerships with additional stakeholders and community organizations, including the Area Agencies on Aging as well as community health workers and others to ensure a large-scale reach to beneficiaries. Working with educators statewide, the TMF Health Quality Institute additionally developed a CKD module for diabetes educators, and disseminated more than 200 CKD education toolkits produced by AKF.</p><p>The TMF has created an advisory group in Dallas that focuses on reducing the disparity in urine microalbumin rates among African-American Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes. The advisory group met monthly for a one-year intervention period, and focused on providing information and assistance to increase primary care physicians' understanding of the evidence-based guidelines on microalbumin testing and early detection of kidney damage. This group provided large-scale and focused on-site interactive education, as well as patient resources and education.</p><p>It is highly promising to witness the application of a structured, functioning CKD education process in clinical practice. Studies have shown that multidisciplinary stage 4/5 CKD clinics have been associated with lower mortality rates and slower progression to ESRD compared with traditional nephrology care.<span>11</span>, <span>12</span> Building on these data from clinical studies done at academic centers with large teams of doctors, nurses, dietitians, and pharmacists, private practice groups have worked to create dedicated CKD clinics that balance cost effectiveness with clinical outcomes. In particular, the Boise Kidney and Hypertension Institute in Boise, Idaho (http://boisekidney.com) has created a stage 4/5 program (The Conductor Clinic) that focuses on early vascular access placement, kidney disease education, optimizing nutrition, and improving communication with primary care physicians.</p><p>In starting their program, the doctors of Boise Kidney first established their optimal targets for surrogate measures such as acidosis, hemoglobin, phosphorous, and albumin. They then identified and invited all appropriate patients in their clinics who had stage 4/5 CKD to join the Conductor Clinic. Currently, new patients to the Conductor Clinic are given bags with information on dietary goals, a video on dialysis options, and a bracelet for protecting the non-dominant arm. Medical assistants screen for GFR changes and remind physicians to place fistulas, to consult a dietitian, and to refer to Boise Kidney's structured kidney education program. Every clinic visit results in a communication packet provided to the primary care physician; the packet includes a comprehensive note, an updated medication list, and clinic labs.</p><p>Finally, near the point of dialysis, a “new patient communication tool” is completed that provides the information needed for the transition to dialysis to occur smoothly, including details on estimated dry weight, hepatitis B vaccination, and documentation of iron levels.</p><p>Comprehensive programs like the one at Boise Kidney require few additional resources other than traditional nephrology care and are likely to result in increased patient satisfaction, improved achievement of surrogate outcomes, and potentially slower GFR decline.</p><p>The challenge to increase kidney disease awareness, help delay the progression of disease, enable patients to make more appropriate choices, and achieve a higher quality of life with better outcomes is not easy. Meeting this challenge will require collaboration by organizations, industry, payors, and patients. The incentivization created by MIPPA 2008 legislation was a good start. Tracking outcomes and creating performance-based accountability can make a difference. The innovations illustrated above are encouraging and clearly demonstrate efforts that are already leading to more optimal care. It is too early to judge the ultimate impact because many developments are still just being implemented. However, as these initiatives expand and are joined by others, clinical outcomes for our patients should improve.</p><p>The author of this review received an honorarium from the publisher for his time and expertise in preparing this article. The publisher had no input on the article; all data and composition is the work of the author.</p>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 9","pages":"397-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20606","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialysis & Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dat.20606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It has been established for many years that early kidney disease education can play a key role in shaping outcomes of dialysis patients. A 1993 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Panel suggested that early referral to a renal team could reduce mortality, psychologically prepare the patient, and reduce a catastrophic onset of dialysis.1 Since that time, the field of nephrology has become more organized through the establishment of a classification system for what is now formally referred to as chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, guidelines have been developed to help promote early disease awareness, and clinical performance measures have been refined.2, 3

However, our outcomes are still disappointing. The most recent U.S. Renal Data System (USRDS) database reveals that only 24.5% of incident patients have seen a nephrologist for more than 12 months prior to starting dialysis, and that only approximately 40% of patients ever see a nephrologist at all before starting care for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This translates to a burdensome and often challenging dialysis start, a decreased opportunity for a positive outcome, and an overall spike in healthcare costs as patients transition into ESRD care. What is most daunting is that among those who have never seen a nephrologist, 89% start dialysis with a central venous catheter. However, even among those patients who have seen nephrologists within a 12-month period preceding dialysis, 55% begin care with a catheter.4

Meanwhile, patients who have been followed by the nephrologist for a median of two years demonstrate limited knowledge of their disease.5 A survey of dialysis patients undertaken by the American Association of Kidney Patients (AAKP) demonstrated that patients receive a lack of uniform, thorough information about possible treatment methods; 31% of respondents said that treatment options were not well represented, and that they were only moderately satisfied with their pre-treatment education.6

Sensing the need for legislative action, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA),7 Section 152(b), added kidney disease patient education services as a covered benefit for Medicare beneficiaries with stage 4 CKD. The rule for kidney disease education services was published in November, 2009 and became effective on January 1, 2010.8 Physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners are eligible providers, and dialysis facilities are excluded. The rule specifies the content. It was specifically designed to provide patients with comprehensive information to help prolong or delay the need for dialysis, manage comorbidities, prevent uremic complications, and help patients participate in an informed decision-making process regarding their options for care.

Qualified persons providing kidney disease education services must also develop outcomes assessments to measure the patients' knowledge about their disease and its treatment. These assessments are intended to improve the effectiveness of preparing patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare options related to CKD and to meet the communication needs of underserved populations, including persons with disabilities, limited English proficiency, and health literacy needs.

The coupling of MIPPA 2008 incentives with the implementation of accountable care organizations (see proposed rules)8 can drive performance-based healthcare and collaboration between primary care physicians and nephrologists. This can increase emphasis on proactive intervention during the earlier stages of kidney disease. The renal community is availing itself of opportunities to improve patient outcomes, take advantages of incentives, and adapt early to changes in the healthcare delivery system. This article reviews efforts by a cross section of groups that have demonstrated forward thinking and a need to meet the challenges described above.

Through a rigorous scientific process, the RPA developed the Advanced CKD Patient Management Toolkit in 2004 (www.renalmd.org/RPA-Advanced-CKD-Patient-Management-Toolkit) to assist practitioners in implementing the recommendations included in RPA's third evidence-based clinical practice guideline, Appropriate Patient Preparation for Renal Therapy.9 The toolkit is organized into four main areas (assess, tailor, implement and evaluate) and- includes 16 categories and sets of tools for healthcare providers and kidney patients. In 2005, with technical support from the Duke Center for Clinical Health Policy Research (CCHPR), the RPA studied the use of the toolkit in two diverse nephrology practices in North Carolina over a six-month period. The toolkit was modified and re-released for dissemination to nephrology practitioners in 2006. In 2008, the RPA, in conjunction with Duke CCHPR, launched a ten-site field test of the CKD toolkit in nephrology practices around the country to determine the critical success factors for improving outcomes of patients with advanced CKD through processes delineated in the toolkit. The field test concluded in 2010, and the study results are being submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

In addition, the RPA has modified a selected subset of the tools to assist primary care providers with identifying and co-managing advanced CKD patients. To test the usability and feasibility of these tools, RPA conducted an 18-month pilot study at two nephrology practices and their referring primary care practices in Chicago and Philadelphia. During the Improved Identification and Co-Management of Advanced CKD Patients pilot project that began in late 2009, the following tools were tested: CKD Screening Protocol and Recommendation on When to Refer to Nephrologist, CKD Identification and Action Plan Tool, Referring Clinician Fax Back Form, CKD Post-Consult Letter, Concise Practice Guidelines, CKD Chart Flags, and CKD Patient Diary. The RPA plans to apply the lessons learned from this project to nephrology practices across the country. The pilot test concluded in March 2011 and the results and recommendations will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The portal contains links to relevant parties, as well as to work the RPA has done on the matter, such as submitting comments or producing a position paper. The RPA is currently working with the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI) of the American Medical Association to develop additional CKD and ESRD measures.

Additionally, the RPA developed a series of tools regarding the kidney disease education benefit, including FAQs, a documentation tool, and a practice assessment tool intended to assist nephrology practitioners in determining the economic viability of providing the kidney disease education services.

The AAKP (www.aakp.org) is developing a renal e-health literacy program, the purpose of which is to identify and compare health literacy knowledge and practices among patients through e-health literacy activities. It is drawing on its vast experience with patient education in a collaborative effort involving patients and professionals alike, and is involving its patient base to identify, implement, and then evaluate successful research strategies that will improve health literacy outcomes.

Through the implementation of a web-based platform, the AAKP will address the following specific aims:

The proposed renal e-health literacy program is an innovation that moves beyond conventional static healthcare information, and represents the transition from printed-paper brochures to dynamic web-based information. Given that an increasing segment of the U.S. adult population is seeking and retrieving health information online, the program provides a timely shift for meeting patients where they are searching and interacting.

In addition to patients' ability to quickly retrieve information, renal e-health literacy materials can also be updated and tracked for their use and utility. The e-health literacy presentations developed for this program will be designed using rich, interactive, and state-of-the art Internet-based tools to engage learners in active and passive learning sessions and will appeal to diverse learner types (auditory, kinesthetic, and visual).

The AAKP is creating patient-physician education tools to improve patients' understanding of CKD, the importance of screening, their role in the treatment planning process, and adherence/compliance obstacles that they are likely to encounter. These tools will equip the care team and patients with practical strategies to overcome barriers to care.

In April 2011, the Medical Education Institute (MEI) launched a new toolkit for CKD education called, How to Have a Good Future with Kidney Disease (www.lifeoptions.org/goodfuture). Six decks of full-color slides (mainly pictures, with as few words as possible) cover Coming to Terms, Kidneys and Kidney Disease, Slowing Kidney Disease, Transplant, Dialysis and Your Lifestyle, and Your Money and Your Life to help patients to become active partners in self-management of their CKD. Each deck includes slides, speaker's script, learning objectives, a quiz, and PDF handouts for patients. The decks can be used one-on-one or for groups, for stages 3 CKD through end stage. A “Read Me First” document explains the kit, offers presentation tips, matches decks to CKD stages, offers a MIPPA CKD education benefit summary, and provides learning objectives, quiz answers, and credentials/affiliations of the multidisciplinary reviewers. The slide content is consistent with the MIPPA benefit. No outside funding supported development of this slide series.

Also in April 2011, MEI premiered the first multimedia video in a new Let's Talk About It series, called Let's Talk About Fistulas (www.lifeoptions.org/letstalk). Supported by grants from Fistula First, Amgen, and Genzyme, the three-minute video in English and Spanish focuses on why it is a good idea to get rid of a hemodialysis catheter and get a fistula or graft instead. Graphics and animations are used to explain the types of access, risks of infection, and benefits of fistulas. The primary audience is patients who are currently on dialysis using a catheter, with a secondary audience of CKD patients in doctor's offices or clinics—to encourage early fistula placement.

MEI's Kidney School (www.kidneyschool.org) and Home Dialysis Central (www.homedialysis.org) sites have both been recently completely revised and updated, with new looks and simplified navigation. Kidney School is sponsored by an exclusive, unrestricted educational grant from Fresenius Medical Care North America, and content is independent of and not influenced by its corporate sponsor. Home Dialysis Central helps patients and professionals learn about peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis, with information about how these options work, where to find them, what the equipment looks like, online and phone support, message boards, and much more. The site is sponsored by the AAKP, Fresenius Medical Care, Nephrology News & Issues, NxStage, Amgen, Baxter, DaVita, Satellite WellBound, Dialysis Cost Containment, Inc., DCI, ESRD Networks 8 and 13, Liberty, Multimed, Northwest Kidney Centers, Renal Advantage, and this journal, Dialysis & Transplantation. The National Nephrologist Dialysis Study, done in 2010 under the Home Dialysis Central umbrella, was presented at the American Society of Nephrology meeting in November, and a manuscript is in development.

The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) has created a model for CKD education, Your Treatment, Your Choice. In addition they have developed a continuing medical education/continuing nursing education (CME/CNE) webcast presentation and a post-test (www.kidney.org/cme). The objectives of this webcast are to discuss CKD in terms of cognitive, psychosocial, ethnic, cultural, and age-related challenges in order to identify and overcome barriers to informed choice by patients. The webcast presentation also explains the MIPPA act, discusses key precepts to adult learning, and appraises the NKF's Your Treatment, Your Choice patient education program

An example of a regional (state) initiative to improve kidney disease awareness is The Texas Campaign for Kidney Health (http://kidneyhealth.tmf.org). This is an alliance of organizations and agencies involved in prevention, education, and clinical consultation for CKD. These organizations include the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), the Texas Medical Foundation (TMF) Health Quality Institute, the End Stage Renal Disease Network of Texas, the Texas Renal Coalition, and the National Kidney Foundation. This collaboration is serving as a foundation for statewide improvement and system change at the community level, participating in activities to increase screening for nephropathy, promote disease prevention and management of CKD, and provide timely and comprehensive counseling on renal replacement therapy options.

The network promotes patient engagement and the improvement of clinical processes in the treatment of CKD. Love Your Kidneys and its dual program component, Save Their Kidneys (http://savekidneys.com), provide the theme and messaging for collaborative education and outreach activities. In 2009, for example, campaign partners teamed up to develop the Diabetes Educators Lesson Plan—Save Their Kidneys! for use by health educators to demonstrate the close relationship between diabetes and CKD. The program included a lesson plan, a kidney quiz to be used for pre- and post-test comparisons, fact sheets on diabetes and kidney disease, and instructions for a hands-on patient activity demonstrating the effects of diabetes on kidney function, and how to detect early damage. The lesson plan was designed to be used along with the Diabetes Empowerment Education Program (DEEP), currently in use and promoted by Texas Diabetes Program regional Community Diabetes Projects in several regions across the state.

A faith-based toolkit for use in congregations was also developed in 2009. As an influential voice in the community, the clergy has an opportunity to educate the congregants about good healthcare and preventive measures that can change unhealthy lifestyle patterns. The toolkit provides lesson plans, educational materials on diabetes and kidney disease, and important health messages urging at-risk congregants to get tested for kidney disease. The faith-based toolkit and the diabetes educator lesson plans are two among many resources developed and used statewide under the Texas Campaign for Kidney Health to increase awareness of CKD, its risk factors, and the importance of early detection. This campaign works in concert with the Governor's appointed Chronic Kidney Disease Task Force.10

Under the umbrella of the Texas Campaign for Kidney Health, the TMF Health Quality Institute (the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Texas) works directly with physicians and patient advocacy groups to prevent and slow the progression of kidney disease. Currently more than 160 participating physicians (including primary care and nephrologists) statewide receive direct technical assistance from Quality Improvement Consultants to identify high-risk patients, as well as clinical evidence-based strategies to monitor, treat, and slow the progression of the disease. These practices receive direct consultation on implementation of the KDOQI clinical practice guidelines, data analysis, work-flow analysis, and development of flowcharts and/or reminders, as well as coaching on effective strategies to promote patient engagement, including patient education resources from partners including the National Kidney Disease Education Program, the NKF, the American Kidney Fund, the AAKP, and the MEI.

Additionally, the TMF Health Quality Institute works with other engaged providers including primary care physicians, nephrologists, surgeons, vascular access centers, hospitals, and dialysis centers statewide. Assistance is provided to these engaged providers through a number of avenues, including direct technical assistance, large-scale learning strategies, roundtable meetings, and discussions, as well as focused CME/CNE educative events. One example of an intervention that has been developed is a Nephrology Audit Tool, which was designed to help nephrologists identify opportunities within their practices for improvement in process to promote comprehensive and timely renal replacement therapy options for patients electing hemodialysis. A report is provided to the nephrologists identifying areas for improvement, with options to implement tools developed to address identified opportunities.

Focusing on the Rio Grande Valley, the TMF utilized a medical community approach bringing together primary care physicians, nephrologists, surgeons, hospital leaders and staff, outpatient dialysis staff, and educators. A roundtable discussion identified the need for increased vein preservation activities, which led to process changes including automating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reporting in the laboratory information system, avoiding/reducing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines in patients with a decreased eGFR, and coaching providers on improved patient education strategies for chronic kidney disease patients.

Concurrent with physician assistance is a campaign to educate patients with diabetes on disease management and the importance of screening for CKD. Community education and outreach activities are conducted for patients at risk for CKD as well as their families and caregivers. This statewide initiative utilizes partnerships with additional stakeholders and community organizations, including the Area Agencies on Aging as well as community health workers and others to ensure a large-scale reach to beneficiaries. Working with educators statewide, the TMF Health Quality Institute additionally developed a CKD module for diabetes educators, and disseminated more than 200 CKD education toolkits produced by AKF.

The TMF has created an advisory group in Dallas that focuses on reducing the disparity in urine microalbumin rates among African-American Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes. The advisory group met monthly for a one-year intervention period, and focused on providing information and assistance to increase primary care physicians' understanding of the evidence-based guidelines on microalbumin testing and early detection of kidney damage. This group provided large-scale and focused on-site interactive education, as well as patient resources and education.

It is highly promising to witness the application of a structured, functioning CKD education process in clinical practice. Studies have shown that multidisciplinary stage 4/5 CKD clinics have been associated with lower mortality rates and slower progression to ESRD compared with traditional nephrology care.11, 12 Building on these data from clinical studies done at academic centers with large teams of doctors, nurses, dietitians, and pharmacists, private practice groups have worked to create dedicated CKD clinics that balance cost effectiveness with clinical outcomes. In particular, the Boise Kidney and Hypertension Institute in Boise, Idaho (http://boisekidney.com) has created a stage 4/5 program (The Conductor Clinic) that focuses on early vascular access placement, kidney disease education, optimizing nutrition, and improving communication with primary care physicians.

In starting their program, the doctors of Boise Kidney first established their optimal targets for surrogate measures such as acidosis, hemoglobin, phosphorous, and albumin. They then identified and invited all appropriate patients in their clinics who had stage 4/5 CKD to join the Conductor Clinic. Currently, new patients to the Conductor Clinic are given bags with information on dietary goals, a video on dialysis options, and a bracelet for protecting the non-dominant arm. Medical assistants screen for GFR changes and remind physicians to place fistulas, to consult a dietitian, and to refer to Boise Kidney's structured kidney education program. Every clinic visit results in a communication packet provided to the primary care physician; the packet includes a comprehensive note, an updated medication list, and clinic labs.

Finally, near the point of dialysis, a “new patient communication tool” is completed that provides the information needed for the transition to dialysis to occur smoothly, including details on estimated dry weight, hepatitis B vaccination, and documentation of iron levels.

Comprehensive programs like the one at Boise Kidney require few additional resources other than traditional nephrology care and are likely to result in increased patient satisfaction, improved achievement of surrogate outcomes, and potentially slower GFR decline.

The challenge to increase kidney disease awareness, help delay the progression of disease, enable patients to make more appropriate choices, and achieve a higher quality of life with better outcomes is not easy. Meeting this challenge will require collaboration by organizations, industry, payors, and patients. The incentivization created by MIPPA 2008 legislation was a good start. Tracking outcomes and creating performance-based accountability can make a difference. The innovations illustrated above are encouraging and clearly demonstrate efforts that are already leading to more optimal care. It is too early to judge the ultimate impact because many developments are still just being implemented. However, as these initiatives expand and are joined by others, clinical outcomes for our patients should improve.

The author of this review received an honorarium from the publisher for his time and expertise in preparing this article. The publisher had no input on the article; all data and composition is the work of the author.

最新进展:慢性肾脏疾病教育
同样是在2011年4月,MEI推出了《我们谈谈瘘管》新系列的第一个多媒体视频(www.lifeoptions.org/letstalk)。在瘘管第一公司、安进公司和健赞公司的资助下,这段三分钟的英语和西班牙语视频聚焦于为什么放弃血液透析导管,转而使用瘘管或移植物是一个好主意。使用图形和动画来解释通道的类型、感染的风险和瘘管的益处。主要受众是目前使用导管进行透析的患者,次要受众是在医生办公室或诊所的CKD患者,以鼓励早期放置瘘管。MEI的肾脏学校(www.kidneyschool.org)和家庭透析中心(www.homedialysis.org)网站最近都进行了全面的修改和更新,具有新的外观和简化的导航。Kidney School由费森尤斯医疗北美公司提供的独家无限制教育补助金赞助,其内容独立于其企业赞助商,不受其影响。家庭透析中心帮助患者和专业人员了解腹膜透析和家庭血液透析,并提供有关这些选择如何工作,在哪里找到它们,设备的外观,在线和电话支持,留言板等信息。该网站由AAKP、费森尤斯医疗保健、肾脏病新闻和;问题,NxStage,安进,百特,DaVita, Satellite WellBound,透析成本控制公司,DCI, ESRD网络8和13,Liberty, multitime,西北肾脏中心,肾脏优势,以及本杂志,透析&;移植。2010年在家庭透析中心的保护伞下完成的国家肾病学家透析研究,在11月的美国肾病学会会议上发表,手稿正在编写中。美国国家肾脏基金会(NKF)创建了一个CKD教育模式,你的治疗,你的选择。此外,他们还开发了继续医学教育/继续护理教育(CME/CNE)网络广播演示和后测试(www.kidney.org/cme)。本次网络直播的目的是讨论CKD在认知、社会心理、种族、文化和年龄方面的挑战,以确定和克服患者知情选择的障碍。网络广播演示还解释了MIPPA法案,讨论了成人学习的关键原则,并评估了NKF的“您的治疗,您的选择”患者教育计划。一个地区(州)倡议提高肾脏疾病意识的例子是德克萨斯州肾脏健康运动(http://kidneyhealth.tmf.org)。这是一个涉及慢性肾病预防、教育和临床咨询的组织和机构的联盟。这些组织包括德州卫生服务部(DSHS)、德州医学基金会(TMF)健康质量研究所、德州终末期肾脏疾病网络、德州肾脏联盟和国家肾脏基金会。这项合作将为全州范围内的改善和社区层面的系统变革奠定基础,参与活动以增加肾病筛查,促进CKD的疾病预防和管理,并提供及时和全面的肾脏替代治疗方案咨询。该网络促进患者参与和改善慢性肾病治疗的临床过程。爱你的肾脏和它的两个项目组成部分,拯救他们的肾脏(http://savekidneys.com),为合作教育和推广活动提供了主题和信息。例如,在2009年,活动合作伙伴合作制定了糖尿病教育者课程计划-拯救他们的肾脏!供健康教育工作者用来证明糖尿病和慢性肾病之间的密切关系。该项目包括一个课程计划,一个用于测试前后比较的肾脏测试,糖尿病和肾脏疾病的情况说明书,以及一项关于糖尿病对肾功能的影响以及如何发现早期损害的患者实践活动的指导。该课程计划旨在与糖尿病授权教育计划(DEEP)一起使用,该计划目前由德克萨斯州糖尿病计划区域社区糖尿病项目在全州多个地区使用和推广。2009年还开发了一个以信仰为基础的工具包,供会众使用。作为社区中有影响力的声音,神职人员有机会向教友宣传可以改变不健康生活方式的良好保健和预防措施。该工具包提供了关于糖尿病和肾脏疾病的课程计划、教育材料,以及重要的健康信息,敦促有风险的会众进行肾脏疾病检测。 基于信仰的工具包和糖尿病教育者课程计划是德克萨斯州肾脏健康运动开发并在全州范围内使用的许多资源中的两个,以提高对慢性肾病及其危险因素的认识,以及早期发现的重要性。该运动与州长指定的慢性肾脏疾病特别工作组协同工作。10在德克萨斯州肾脏健康运动的保护下,TMF健康质量研究所(德克萨斯州医疗保险质量改进组织)直接与医生和患者倡导团体合作,预防和减缓肾脏疾病的进展。目前,全州160多名参与的医生(包括初级保健和肾病学家)得到了质量改进顾问的直接技术援助,以确定高风险患者,以及临床循证战略,以监测、治疗和减缓疾病的进展。这些实践在KDOQI临床实践指南的实施、数据分析、工作流程分析、流程图和/或提醒的开发以及促进患者参与的有效策略方面接受直接咨询,包括来自国家肾脏疾病教育计划、NKF、美国肾脏基金会、AAKP和MEI等合作伙伴的患者教育资源。此外,TMF健康质量研究所还与其他参与的提供者合作,包括初级保健医生、肾病学家、外科医生、血管访问中心、医院和全州的透析中心。通过多种途径向这些参与的供应商提供援助,包括直接技术援助、大规模学习策略、圆桌会议和讨论,以及集中的CME/CNE教育活动。已经开发的干预措施的一个例子是肾脏病审计工具,该工具旨在帮助肾脏病医生在他们的实践中发现改进过程的机会,从而为选择血液透析的患者提供全面和及时的肾脏替代治疗选择。向肾病学家提供一份报告,确定需要改进的领域,并提供实施开发工具的选项,以解决已确定的机会。TMF以里约热内卢Grande Valley为重点,采用了一种医疗社区的方法,汇集了初级保健医生、肾病学家、外科医生、医院领导和工作人员、门诊透析人员和教育工作者。圆桌讨论确定了增加静脉保存活动的必要性,这导致了过程的改变,包括在实验室信息系统中自动报告估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR),避免/减少eGFR降低患者的外周插入中心导管(PICC)线,以及指导提供者改进慢性肾病患者的患者教育策略。在医生协助的同时,还开展了一项运动,教育糖尿病患者了解疾病管理和CKD筛查的重要性。社区教育和外展活动针对有CKD风险的患者及其家属和照顾者。这项全州范围的倡议利用了与其他利益攸关方和社区组织的伙伴关系,包括老龄问题地区机构以及社区卫生工作者和其他组织,以确保大规模惠及受益人。TMF健康质量研究所与全州的教育工作者合作,还为糖尿病教育工作者开发了CKD模块,并传播了AKF制作的200多个CKD教育工具包。TMF在达拉斯成立了一个咨询小组,专注于减少非裔美国糖尿病医疗保险受益人尿微量白蛋白率的差异。在为期一年的干预期内,咨询小组每月召开一次会议,重点是提供信息和帮助,以提高初级保健医生对微量白蛋白检测和早期发现肾损害的循证指南的理解。该组提供大规模、集中的现场互动教育,以及患者资源和教育。在临床实践中,结构化、功能性CKD教育过程的应用是非常有希望的。研究表明,与传统的肾脏病护理相比,多学科的4/5期CKD诊所具有较低的死亡率和较慢的ESRD进展。11,12在学术中心的临床研究数据的基础上,由医生、护士、营养师和药剂师组成的大型团队,私人执业团体已经努力创建专门的CKD诊所,以平衡成本效益和临床结果。特别是爱达荷州博伊西肾脏和高血压研究所(http://boisekidney)。 com)创建了一个4/5阶段项目(The Conductor Clinic),该项目专注于早期血管通路的放置、肾脏疾病教育、优化营养以及改善与初级保健医生的沟通。在开始他们的项目时,博伊西肾脏医院的医生首先确定了他们的最佳替代指标,如酸中毒、血红蛋白、磷和白蛋白。然后,他们确定并邀请他们诊所中所有合适的4/5期CKD患者加入指挥诊所。目前,到指挥诊所就诊的新患者会得到一个装有饮食目标信息的袋子,一个透析选择的视频,以及一个保护非显性手臂的手镯。医疗助理筛查GFR变化,提醒医生放置瘘管,咨询营养师,并参考博伊西肾脏组织的结构化肾脏教育计划。每次就诊都会给初级保健医生提供一个通信包;包包括一个全面的说明,一个最新的药物清单,和临床实验室。最后,在透析点附近,完成了“新的患者沟通工具”,提供了顺利过渡到透析所需的信息,包括估计干重、乙型肝炎疫苗接种和铁水平记录的详细信息。像Boise Kidney这样的综合项目,除了传统的肾脏学护理之外,几乎不需要额外的资源,而且可能会提高患者的满意度,改善替代结果的实现,并可能减缓GFR的下降。提高对肾脏疾病的认识,帮助延缓疾病的进展,使患者做出更适当的选择,并实现更高的生活质量和更好的结果,这一挑战并不容易。应对这一挑战需要组织、行业、付款人和患者的合作。MIPPA 2008立法创造的激励机制是一个良好的开端。跟踪结果和建立基于绩效的问责制可以带来改变。上述创新是令人鼓舞的,并清楚地表明,努力已经导致更理想的护理。现在判断最终影响还为时过早,因为许多发展仍在实施中。然而,随着这些举措的扩大和其他机构的加入,我们患者的临床结果应该会得到改善。这篇评论的作者从出版商那里获得了一笔酬金,以酬谢他为准备这篇文章所付出的时间和专业知识。出版商对这篇文章没有任何意见;所有的数据和组成是作者的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialysis & Transplantation
Dialysis & Transplantation 医学-工程:生物医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信