Performance assessment of weighted mean temperature models derived from AIRS and ERA5 reanalysis for calculating GPS precipitable water vapor in the thailand region

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Chaiyut Charoenphon, Chokchai Trakolkul, Chalermchon Satirapod
{"title":"Performance assessment of weighted mean temperature models derived from AIRS and ERA5 reanalysis for calculating GPS precipitable water vapor in the thailand region","authors":"Chaiyut Charoenphon,&nbsp;Chokchai Trakolkul,&nbsp;Chalermchon Satirapod","doi":"10.1007/s40328-022-00397-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The determination of Precipitable Water Vapor (PWV) using GNSS data with Precise Point Processing (PPP) is a useful alternative for precisely estimating atmospheric water vapor. The use of GNSS data allows for all-weather PWV tracking 24 h a day, 7 days a week. The weighted mean temperature (<i>T</i><sub>m</sub>) is an important variable in deriving GNSS-PWV values with high accuracy, especially in tropical zones. Unfortunately, the usual method of obtaining T<sub>m</sub> is through expensive meteorological instruments such as radiosondes which are not available in every region of Thailand. This current research derives empirical models of <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> based on two data sets: one provided by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on the EOS/Aqua platform, and one provided in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts’ (ECMWF) ERA5 Reanalysis. GNSS-PWV was calculated for 76 GNSS CORS around Thailand using <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> values calculated by the developed models in conjunction with GipsyX software. Results were validated against AIRS-PWV values, and compared against other existing <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> models. Results based on the developed AIRS-Tm and ERA5-Tm models, as well as the existing Suwantong, Bevis, Mendes, Schueler, and GPT3 models, showed mean biases in PWV difference against AIRS-PWV values of 0.3, 0.2, − 0.3, 1.0, 0.8, 1.8, and 1.1 mm, respectively. These results conclude that the mean bias of GPS-PWV estimations can be reduced when a more localized countrywide T<sub>m</sub> model is used versus a global model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48965,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40328-022-00397-1.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40328-022-00397-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The determination of Precipitable Water Vapor (PWV) using GNSS data with Precise Point Processing (PPP) is a useful alternative for precisely estimating atmospheric water vapor. The use of GNSS data allows for all-weather PWV tracking 24 h a day, 7 days a week. The weighted mean temperature (Tm) is an important variable in deriving GNSS-PWV values with high accuracy, especially in tropical zones. Unfortunately, the usual method of obtaining Tm is through expensive meteorological instruments such as radiosondes which are not available in every region of Thailand. This current research derives empirical models of Tm based on two data sets: one provided by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on the EOS/Aqua platform, and one provided in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts’ (ECMWF) ERA5 Reanalysis. GNSS-PWV was calculated for 76 GNSS CORS around Thailand using Tm values calculated by the developed models in conjunction with GipsyX software. Results were validated against AIRS-PWV values, and compared against other existing Tm models. Results based on the developed AIRS-Tm and ERA5-Tm models, as well as the existing Suwantong, Bevis, Mendes, Schueler, and GPT3 models, showed mean biases in PWV difference against AIRS-PWV values of 0.3, 0.2, − 0.3, 1.0, 0.8, 1.8, and 1.1 mm, respectively. These results conclude that the mean bias of GPS-PWV estimations can be reduced when a more localized countrywide Tm model is used versus a global model.

Abstract Image

基于AIRS和ERA5再分析的加权平均温度模式计算泰国地区GPS可降水量的性能评价
利用精确点处理(PPP)的GNSS数据确定可降水量(PWV)是精确估算大气水蒸气的一种有用的替代方法。使用GNSS数据可以一周7天,每天24小时全天候跟踪PWV。加权平均温度(Tm)是获得高精度GNSS-PWV值的重要变量,特别是在热带地区。不幸的是,获取Tm的通常方法是通过昂贵的气象仪器,如无线电探空仪,而这种仪器并非在泰国的每个地区都有。本研究基于两个数据集推导了Tm的经验模型:一个数据集由EOS/Aqua平台上的大气红外探测器(AIRS)提供,另一个数据集由欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF) ERA5再分析提供。利用开发的模型与GipsyX软件结合计算的Tm值,计算了泰国周围76个GNSS CORS的GNSS- pwv。结果与AIRS-PWV值进行了验证,并与其他现有Tm模型进行了比较。基于开发的AIRS-Tm和ERA5-Tm模型,以及现有的Suwantong、Bevis、Mendes、Schueler和GPT3模型,PWV与AIRS-PWV值的平均偏差分别为0.3、0.2、−0.3、1.0、0.8、1.8和1.1 mm。这些结果表明,与全球模型相比,使用更本地化的全国Tm模型可以降低GPS-PWV估计的平均偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers in the field of geodesy and geophysics under headings: aeronomy and space physics, electromagnetic studies, geodesy and gravimetry, geodynamics, geomathematics, rock physics, seismology, solid earth physics, history. Papers dealing with problems of the Carpathian region and its surroundings are preferred. Similarly, papers on topics traditionally covered by Hungarian geodesists and geophysicists (e.g. robust estimations, geoid, EM properties of the Earth’s crust, geomagnetic pulsations and seismological risk) are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信