Determination of ropivacaine and its metabolites in human plasma using solid phase microextraction and GC-NPD/GC-MS

Mohamed Abdel-Rehim, Mikael Andersson, Erik Portelius, Carina Norsten-Höög, Lars G. Blomberg
{"title":"Determination of ropivacaine and its metabolites in human plasma using solid phase microextraction and GC-NPD/GC-MS","authors":"Mohamed Abdel-Rehim,&nbsp;Mikael Andersson,&nbsp;Erik Portelius,&nbsp;Carina Norsten-Höög,&nbsp;Lars G. Blomberg","doi":"10.1002/mcs.10012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The performance of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with capillary gas chromatography (CGC) to quantify ropivacaine and its metabolites in human plasma was investigated. The analysis was performed using either a nitrogen phosphorus detector (NPD) or a mass-spectrometric detector. For extraction, Carbowax/divinylbenzene, polyacrylate and polydimethylsiloxane fibers were tested. Absorption and desorption times were studied for all analytes separately. The Carbowax/divinylbenzene fiber gave the highest recovery in plasma samples as compared to the other fibers. The effects of temperature, addition of salt, and agitation of the sample were studied. The validation of the method showed that the chromatographic selectivity was satisfactory and all metabolites were well separated. SPME gave higher deviation as compared to published data for solid-phase and liquid-liquid extraction as sample preparation methods but the acceptance criteria for the study validation were well in line with the international criteria. The major disadvantage of SPME in quantitative bioanalysis is that the fiber does not withstand a complete run (standards+blanks+QC samples+patient samples). Also, the quality of fiber and the fiber length can differ from batch to batch. © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Micro Sep 13: 313–321, 2001</p>","PeriodicalId":83120,"journal":{"name":"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS","volume":"13 8","pages":"313-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcs.10012","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcs.10012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The performance of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with capillary gas chromatography (CGC) to quantify ropivacaine and its metabolites in human plasma was investigated. The analysis was performed using either a nitrogen phosphorus detector (NPD) or a mass-spectrometric detector. For extraction, Carbowax/divinylbenzene, polyacrylate and polydimethylsiloxane fibers were tested. Absorption and desorption times were studied for all analytes separately. The Carbowax/divinylbenzene fiber gave the highest recovery in plasma samples as compared to the other fibers. The effects of temperature, addition of salt, and agitation of the sample were studied. The validation of the method showed that the chromatographic selectivity was satisfactory and all metabolites were well separated. SPME gave higher deviation as compared to published data for solid-phase and liquid-liquid extraction as sample preparation methods but the acceptance criteria for the study validation were well in line with the international criteria. The major disadvantage of SPME in quantitative bioanalysis is that the fiber does not withstand a complete run (standards+blanks+QC samples+patient samples). Also, the quality of fiber and the fiber length can differ from batch to batch. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Micro Sep 13: 313–321, 2001

固相微萃取-气相色谱- npd /气相色谱-质谱法测定人血浆中罗哌卡因及其代谢物
研究了固相微萃取法(SPME)联合毛细管气相色谱法(CGC)定量人血浆中罗哌卡因及其代谢物的性能。分析使用氮磷检测器(NPD)或质谱检测器进行。对碳蜡/二乙烯基苯、聚丙烯酸酯和聚二甲基硅氧烷纤维进行了提取试验。分别研究了所有分析物的吸收和解吸时间。与其他纤维相比,碳蜡/二乙烯苯纤维在血浆样品中的回收率最高。研究了温度、盐的加入、样品的搅拌等因素的影响。结果表明,该方法具有良好的色谱选择性,代谢产物分离效果良好。固相萃取和液液萃取作为样品制备方法,SPME与已发表的数据相比偏差较大,但本研究验证的接受标准与国际标准一致。SPME在定量生物分析中的主要缺点是纤维不能承受完整的运行(标准品+空白品+QC样品+患者样品)。此外,纤维的质量和纤维长度也会因批次而异。©2001 John Wiley &[J] .中国科技大学学报(自然科学版),2001
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信