{"title":"Editors’ notes","authors":"M. Mark, Nicholas R. Hart","doi":"10.1002/ev.20493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This volume surveys the landscape regarding evaluation policy. According to Trochim et al. (2009, p. 16), evaluation policy includes “any rule or principle that a group or organization uses to guide its decisions and actions when doing evaluation.” Evaluation policy involves rules or principles that govern evaluation itself. Evaluation policies can be quite important because they are likely to “enable and constrain the potential contributions evaluation can make” (Mark et al., 2009, p. 3). The current issue of NDE expands on and updates an earlier issue, New Directions for Evaluation (NDE, issue no. 123) (Trochim et al., 2009). Much has changed since the 2009 issue, including more widespread development of explicit evaluation policies in agencies and organizations; empirical studies of evaluation policies; important legislation at the U.S. federal level, particularly the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (the Evidence Act), which was signed into law in 2019; and ongoing changes in practices related to and emanating from evaluation policies, including those mandated by the Evidence Act. The current issue reviews many of these empirical, legislative, and practice developments, bringing readers up to date on evaluation policy and pointing the way to productive future directions. Most chapters in the issue focus primarily on the U.S. federal government. However, the volume gives attention to implications for the broader evaluation community. The first chapter, by the issue editors, Nick Hart and Mel Mark, introduces the reader to the idea of evaluation policy, offers a brief history, examines the role of the American Evaluation Association (AEA), and sets the stage for the chapters that follow. Chapter 2 consists of the AEA’s Evaluation Roadmap for a More Effective Government, prepared by the Association’s Evaluation Policy Task Force. In Chapter 3, Hind Al Hudib and Bradley Cousins draw on their research examining the written evaluation policies of a sample of international development agencies, a sample that, although global in scope, includes agencies of the U.S. federal government. Al Hudib and Cousins expand Trochim’s (2009) definition of evaluation policy, review the components found in evaluation policies, and examine likely linkages between aspects of an evaluation policy and evaluation capacity building. Chapter 4, by Leslie Ann Fierro, Alana Kinarsky, Carlos Escheverra-Estrada, Nadia Bass, and Christina Ann Christie, presents results from an interview study examining the initial implementation of evaluation policies at the U.S. federal level. Chapter 5, by Kathryn Newcomer, Karol Olejniczak, and Nicholas Hart, focuses on learning agendas, also known as evidence-building plans. Learning agendas are a requirement of the Evidence Act, but some federal agencies and other organizations had previously created this kind of strategic plan for evaluation and evidence. Newcomer and her colleagues","PeriodicalId":35250,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Evaluation","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This volume surveys the landscape regarding evaluation policy. According to Trochim et al. (2009, p. 16), evaluation policy includes “any rule or principle that a group or organization uses to guide its decisions and actions when doing evaluation.” Evaluation policy involves rules or principles that govern evaluation itself. Evaluation policies can be quite important because they are likely to “enable and constrain the potential contributions evaluation can make” (Mark et al., 2009, p. 3). The current issue of NDE expands on and updates an earlier issue, New Directions for Evaluation (NDE, issue no. 123) (Trochim et al., 2009). Much has changed since the 2009 issue, including more widespread development of explicit evaluation policies in agencies and organizations; empirical studies of evaluation policies; important legislation at the U.S. federal level, particularly the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (the Evidence Act), which was signed into law in 2019; and ongoing changes in practices related to and emanating from evaluation policies, including those mandated by the Evidence Act. The current issue reviews many of these empirical, legislative, and practice developments, bringing readers up to date on evaluation policy and pointing the way to productive future directions. Most chapters in the issue focus primarily on the U.S. federal government. However, the volume gives attention to implications for the broader evaluation community. The first chapter, by the issue editors, Nick Hart and Mel Mark, introduces the reader to the idea of evaluation policy, offers a brief history, examines the role of the American Evaluation Association (AEA), and sets the stage for the chapters that follow. Chapter 2 consists of the AEA’s Evaluation Roadmap for a More Effective Government, prepared by the Association’s Evaluation Policy Task Force. In Chapter 3, Hind Al Hudib and Bradley Cousins draw on their research examining the written evaluation policies of a sample of international development agencies, a sample that, although global in scope, includes agencies of the U.S. federal government. Al Hudib and Cousins expand Trochim’s (2009) definition of evaluation policy, review the components found in evaluation policies, and examine likely linkages between aspects of an evaluation policy and evaluation capacity building. Chapter 4, by Leslie Ann Fierro, Alana Kinarsky, Carlos Escheverra-Estrada, Nadia Bass, and Christina Ann Christie, presents results from an interview study examining the initial implementation of evaluation policies at the U.S. federal level. Chapter 5, by Kathryn Newcomer, Karol Olejniczak, and Nicholas Hart, focuses on learning agendas, also known as evidence-building plans. Learning agendas are a requirement of the Evidence Act, but some federal agencies and other organizations had previously created this kind of strategic plan for evaluation and evidence. Newcomer and her colleagues
本卷调查有关评价政策的景观。根据Trochim et al. (2009, p. 16),评估政策包括“一个团体或组织在进行评估时用来指导其决策和行动的任何规则或原则”。评估政策包括管理评估本身的规则或原则。评估策略可能非常重要,因为它们可能“启用和限制评估可能做出的潜在贡献”(Mark等人,2009年,第3页)。NDE的本期扩展并更新了早期的一期《评估新方向》(NDE,第3期)。123) (Trochim et al., 2009)。自2009年以来,情况发生了很大变化,包括各机构和组织更广泛地制定了明确的评估政策;评价政策的实证研究;美国联邦层面的重要立法,特别是2019年签署成为法律的《2018年循证决策基础法案》(以下简称《证据法案》);以及与评估政策相关和产生的实践的持续变化,包括《证据法》规定的评估政策。本期杂志回顾了许多这些经验、立法和实践的发展,使读者了解评估政策的最新情况,并指出了富有成效的未来方向。该问题的大多数章节主要关注美国联邦政府。但是,本卷注意到对更广泛的评价界的影响。第一章,由问题的编辑,尼克·哈特和梅尔·马克,向读者介绍了评估政策的概念,提供了一个简短的历史,考察了美国评估协会(AEA)的作用,并为接下来的章节奠定了基础。第二章是美国行政审批协会评估政策工作组制定的“更有效的政府评估路线图”。在第三章中,Hind Al Hudib和Bradley Cousins利用他们的研究考察了国际发展机构样本的书面评估政策,该样本虽然在全球范围内,但包括美国联邦政府的机构。Al Hudib和Cousins扩展了Trochim(2009)对评估政策的定义,回顾了评估政策中发现的组成部分,并研究了评估政策各方面与评估能力建设之间可能存在的联系。第四章由Leslie Ann Fierro、Alana Kinarsky、Carlos Escheverra-Estrada、Nadia Bass和Christina Ann Christie撰写,介绍了一项访谈研究的结果,该研究考察了美国联邦一级评估政策的初步实施情况。第五章由Kathryn Newcomer、Karol Olejniczak和Nicholas Hart撰写,重点关注学习议程,也称为证据构建计划。学习议程是《证据法》的一项要求,但一些联邦机构和其他组织此前已经制定了这种评估和证据的战略计划。纽卡姆和她的同事