Analysis artefacts of the INS-IGF2 fusion transcript

IF 2.946 Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Rasmus Wernersson, Thomas Frogne, Claude Rescan, Lena Hansson, Christine Bruun, Mads Grønborg, Jan Nygaard Jensen, Ole Dragsbæk Madsen
{"title":"Analysis artefacts of the INS-IGF2 fusion transcript","authors":"Rasmus Wernersson,&nbsp;Thomas Frogne,&nbsp;Claude Rescan,&nbsp;Lena Hansson,&nbsp;Christine Bruun,&nbsp;Mads Grønborg,&nbsp;Jan Nygaard Jensen,&nbsp;Ole Dragsbæk Madsen","doi":"10.1186/s12867-015-0042-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In gene expression analysis, overlapping genes, splice variants, and fusion transcripts are potential sources of data analysis artefacts, depending on how the observed intensity is assigned to one, or more genes. We here exemplify this by an in-depth analysis of the INS-IGF2 fusion transcript, which has recently been reported to be among the highest expressed transcripts in human pancreatic beta cells and its protein indicated as a novel autoantigen in Type 1 Diabetes.</p><p>Through RNA sequencing and variant specific qPCR analyses we demonstrate that the true abundance of INS-IGF2 is &gt;20,000 fold lower than INS in human beta cells, and we suggest an explanation to the nature of the artefacts which have previously led to overestimation of the gene expression level in selected studies. We reinvestigated the previous reported findings of detection of INS-IGF2 using antibodies both in Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. We found that the one available commercial antibody (BO1P) raised against recombinant INS-IGF2 show strong cross-reaction to native proinsulin, and we did not detect INS-IGF2 protein in the human beta cell line EndoC-βH1. Furthermore, using highly sensitive proteomics analysis we could not demonstrate INS-IGF2 protein in samples of human islets nor in EndoC-βH1.</p><p>Sequence features, such as fusion transcripts spanning multiple genes can lead to unexpected results in gene expression analysis, and care must be taken in generating and interpreting the results. For the specific case of INS-IGF2 we conclude that the abundance of the fusion transcript/protein is exceedingly lower than previously reported, and that current immuno-reagents available for detecting INS-IGF2 protein have a strong cross-reaction to native human proinsulin. Finally, we were unable to detect INS-IGF2 protein by proteomics analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":497,"journal":{"name":"BMC Molecular Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9460,"publicationDate":"2015-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12867-015-0042-8","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12867-015-0042-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In gene expression analysis, overlapping genes, splice variants, and fusion transcripts are potential sources of data analysis artefacts, depending on how the observed intensity is assigned to one, or more genes. We here exemplify this by an in-depth analysis of the INS-IGF2 fusion transcript, which has recently been reported to be among the highest expressed transcripts in human pancreatic beta cells and its protein indicated as a novel autoantigen in Type 1 Diabetes.

Through RNA sequencing and variant specific qPCR analyses we demonstrate that the true abundance of INS-IGF2 is >20,000 fold lower than INS in human beta cells, and we suggest an explanation to the nature of the artefacts which have previously led to overestimation of the gene expression level in selected studies. We reinvestigated the previous reported findings of detection of INS-IGF2 using antibodies both in Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. We found that the one available commercial antibody (BO1P) raised against recombinant INS-IGF2 show strong cross-reaction to native proinsulin, and we did not detect INS-IGF2 protein in the human beta cell line EndoC-βH1. Furthermore, using highly sensitive proteomics analysis we could not demonstrate INS-IGF2 protein in samples of human islets nor in EndoC-βH1.

Sequence features, such as fusion transcripts spanning multiple genes can lead to unexpected results in gene expression analysis, and care must be taken in generating and interpreting the results. For the specific case of INS-IGF2 we conclude that the abundance of the fusion transcript/protein is exceedingly lower than previously reported, and that current immuno-reagents available for detecting INS-IGF2 protein have a strong cross-reaction to native human proinsulin. Finally, we were unable to detect INS-IGF2 protein by proteomics analysis.

Abstract Image

INS-IGF2融合转录物的分析伪影
在基因表达分析中,重叠基因、剪接变异体和融合转录本是数据分析伪影的潜在来源,这取决于观察到的强度如何分配给一个或多个基因。我们在这里通过对INS-IGF2融合转录物的深入分析来证明这一点,最近有报道称,INS-IGF2融合转录物是人类胰腺β细胞中表达最高的转录物之一,其蛋白被认为是1型糖尿病的一种新的自身抗原。通过RNA测序和变异特异性qPCR分析,我们证明了INS- igf2的真实丰度比人类β细胞中的INS低20,000倍,并且我们提出了对先前在某些研究中导致高估基因表达水平的伪像性质的解释。我们重新研究了先前报道的使用抗体在Western blotting和免疫组织化学中检测INS-IGF2的发现。我们发现针对重组INS-IGF2的一种可用的商业抗体(BO1P)与天然胰岛素原有很强的交叉反应,并且我们在人β细胞系EndoC-βH1中未检测到INS-IGF2蛋白。此外,使用高灵敏度的蛋白质组学分析,我们无法在人类胰岛样本中证明INS-IGF2蛋白,也无法在EndoC-βH1中证明INS-IGF2蛋白。序列特征,如跨多个基因的融合转录本,可能导致基因表达分析中意想不到的结果,在产生和解释结果时必须小心。对于特定的INS-IGF2病例,我们得出结论,融合转录物/蛋白的丰度远低于之前报道的,并且目前可用于检测INS-IGF2蛋白的免疫试剂与天然人胰岛素原具有强烈的交叉反应。最后,我们无法通过蛋白质组学分析检测到INS-IGF2蛋白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Molecular Biology
BMC Molecular Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Molecular Biology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of DNA and RNA in a cellular context, encompassing investigations of chromatin, replication, recombination, mutation, repair, transcription, translation and RNA processing and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信